|
Rapprochement?
In article ,
says... On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:06:32 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 12:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:46:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 11:32 AM, wrote: "Efforts"? The question was whether the service was unavailable, not whether it was unpopular. BTW there are hospitals in DC that don't do "abortions". (although you can get a procedure that terminates a pregnancy) The "efforts" to shut down womens' health clinics is pretty successful. Don't you see the news? As for DC, there literally are dozens of good hospitals in our metro area. That some religiously sponsored hospitals, Catholic hospitals, for example, might not perform an abortion doesn't mean you have to drive far to find a hospital that will perform one. It's not like being in Kansas or some other backwards state. Nobody makes people live there. You don't need an exit visa to move away from Texas. You say you don't even want to drive through some states and I bet they don't care. Our states have far from uniform laws and customs. They are decided by the people who live there and if you don't, they don't care what you think. There are plenty on northeastern laws that are just as objectionable to Texans. Houston has no "zoning". The people who live there are happy with that. If they aren't MOVE. You can go to Chicago or New York where the nanny state will regulate every facet of your life from the gun you can own, the "required" conduit in your wall or the soft drinks you can't buy. Wow. Worst response ever. Many people live where they live because they don't have the ability to move somewhere else. The Supreme Court has ruled that abortion is legal. What the backwards states have done is game the system to shove the religious beliefs of their legislators and governors onto the people. Tell me again why they can't move. Also... The citizens elected those legislators, not you. You have no right to say what their laws are. O'Malley would not get more than single digits in Texas and Texans have no right to complain about the laws of Maryland. They don't like it, they can do what I did, MOVE. My move was far from painless but I did it because I had no interest in living there. Some people don't have the financial resources to move. |
Rapprochement?
On 9/27/13 2:49 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:06:32 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 12:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:46:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 11:32 AM, wrote: "Efforts"? The question was whether the service was unavailable, not whether it was unpopular. BTW there are hospitals in DC that don't do "abortions". (although you can get a procedure that terminates a pregnancy) The "efforts" to shut down womens' health clinics is pretty successful. Don't you see the news? As for DC, there literally are dozens of good hospitals in our metro area. That some religiously sponsored hospitals, Catholic hospitals, for example, might not perform an abortion doesn't mean you have to drive far to find a hospital that will perform one. It's not like being in Kansas or some other backwards state. Nobody makes people live there. You don't need an exit visa to move away from Texas. You say you don't even want to drive through some states and I bet they don't care. Our states have far from uniform laws and customs. They are decided by the people who live there and if you don't, they don't care what you think. There are plenty on northeastern laws that are just as objectionable to Texans. Houston has no "zoning". The people who live there are happy with that. If they aren't MOVE. You can go to Chicago or New York where the nanny state will regulate every facet of your life from the gun you can own, the "required" conduit in your wall or the soft drinks you can't buy. Wow. Worst response ever. Many people live where they live because they don't have the ability to move somewhere else. The Supreme Court has ruled that abortion is legal. What the backwards states have done is game the system to shove the religious beliefs of their legislators and governors onto the people. Tell me again why they can't move. Also... The citizens elected those legislators, not you. You have no right to say what their laws are. O'Malley would not get more than single digits in Texas and Texans have no right to complain about the laws of Maryland. They don't like it, they can do what I did, MOVE. My move was far from painless but I did it because I had no interest in living there. Some people don't have the financial resources to move. Poor people without resources don't exist in Greg's world, apparently. Also, abortions are *legal* in the United States. What these several states are doing is skirting the federal law that allows abortion. |
Rapprochement?
On 9/27/13 2:12 PM, skin a cat wrote:
You are partially right. The states shouldn't have a right to determine other state laws, but if you are a solid blue state and a red state passes a law that makes it more attractive for a car or airplane manufacturer to move there, you will have the Administration on you doing the blue states bidding and protecting the corruption.. You might want to have someone read to you and explain Articles IV and VI of the Constitution of the United States. |
Rapprochement?
On 9/27/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:49:27 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Some people don't have the financial resources to move. Maybe we should sterilize them, at least temporarily. (Norplant) Don't get me wrong. I thing abortion should be free for poor people and highly encouraged. I am just saying this is something that the residents of the state should decide, not someone living 1500 miles away who would not even stop for gas in that state if their GPS screwed up and steered them there.. "It" was decided by the United States Supreme Court. What these Republican states are doing is gaming the system and unfortunately, it takes many years usually for a suit filed against what these states are doing to reach federal courts, courts of appeal, and the supremes. |
Rapprochement?
On 9/27/13 3:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:53:00 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 2:49 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:06:32 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 12:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:46:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 11:32 AM, wrote: "Efforts"? The question was whether the service was unavailable, not whether it was unpopular. BTW there are hospitals in DC that don't do "abortions". (although you can get a procedure that terminates a pregnancy) The "efforts" to shut down womens' health clinics is pretty successful. Don't you see the news? As for DC, there literally are dozens of good hospitals in our metro area. That some religiously sponsored hospitals, Catholic hospitals, for example, might not perform an abortion doesn't mean you have to drive far to find a hospital that will perform one. It's not like being in Kansas or some other backwards state. Nobody makes people live there. You don't need an exit visa to move away from Texas. You say you don't even want to drive through some states and I bet they don't care. Our states have far from uniform laws and customs. They are decided by the people who live there and if you don't, they don't care what you think. There are plenty on northeastern laws that are just as objectionable to Texans. Houston has no "zoning". The people who live there are happy with that. If they aren't MOVE. You can go to Chicago or New York where the nanny state will regulate every facet of your life from the gun you can own, the "required" conduit in your wall or the soft drinks you can't buy. Wow. Worst response ever. Many people live where they live because they don't have the ability to move somewhere else. The Supreme Court has ruled that abortion is legal. What the backwards states have done is game the system to shove the religious beliefs of their legislators and governors onto the people. Tell me again why they can't move. Also... The citizens elected those legislators, not you. You have no right to say what their laws are. O'Malley would not get more than single digits in Texas and Texans have no right to complain about the laws of Maryland. They don't like it, they can do what I did, MOVE. My move was far from painless but I did it because I had no interest in living there. Some people don't have the financial resources to move. Poor people without resources don't exist in Greg's world, apparently. Also, abortions are *legal* in the United States. What these several states are doing is skirting the federal law that allows abortion. Which law did they break? Be specific. The Supreme Court has ruled that abortions are legal. The states have cooked their legislative books to make abortions illegal. |
Rapprochement?
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 9/27/13 2:49 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:06:32 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 12:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:46:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 11:32 AM, wrote: "Efforts"? The question was whether the service was unavailable, not whether it was unpopular. BTW there are hospitals in DC that don't do "abortions". (although you can get a procedure that terminates a pregnancy) The "efforts" to shut down womens' health clinics is pretty successful. Don't you see the news? As for DC, there literally are dozens of good hospitals in our metro area. That some religiously sponsored hospitals, Catholic hospitals, for example, might not perform an abortion doesn't mean you have to drive far to find a hospital that will perform one. It's not like being in Kansas or some other backwards state. Nobody makes people live there. You don't need an exit visa to move away from Texas. You say you don't even want to drive through some states and I bet they don't care. Our states have far from uniform laws and customs. They are decided by the people who live there and if you don't, they don't care what you think. There are plenty on northeastern laws that are just as objectionable to Texans. Houston has no "zoning". The people who live there are happy with that. If they aren't MOVE. You can go to Chicago or New York where the nanny state will regulate every facet of your life from the gun you can own, the "required" conduit in your wall or the soft drinks you can't buy. Wow. Worst response ever. Many people live where they live because they don't have the ability to move somewhere else. The Supreme Court has ruled that abortion is legal. What the backwards states have done is game the system to shove the religious beliefs of their legislators and governors onto the people. Tell me again why they can't move. Also... The citizens elected those legislators, not you. You have no right to say what their laws are. O'Malley would not get more than single digits in Texas and Texans have no right to complain about the laws of Maryland. They don't like it, they can do what I did, MOVE. My move was far from painless but I did it because I had no interest in living there. Some people don't have the financial resources to move. Poor people without resources don't exist in Greg's world, apparently. Also, abortions are *legal* in the United States. What these several states are doing is skirting the federal law that allows abortion. Abortions used to be legal in the first trimester. Now it seems the baby can be aborted as long as part of the baby is still in the birth canal. Feet exit, then it is murder. Matter of a quart we inch. How many abortions are needed at 9 months to save a mothers life? |
Rapprochement?
On 9/27/2013 3:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:53:00 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 2:49 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:06:32 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 12:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:46:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 11:32 AM, wrote: "Efforts"? The question was whether the service was unavailable, not whether it was unpopular. BTW there are hospitals in DC that don't do "abortions". (although you can get a procedure that terminates a pregnancy) The "efforts" to shut down womens' health clinics is pretty successful. Don't you see the news? As for DC, there literally are dozens of good hospitals in our metro area. That some religiously sponsored hospitals, Catholic hospitals, for example, might not perform an abortion doesn't mean you have to drive far to find a hospital that will perform one. It's not like being in Kansas or some other backwards state. Nobody makes people live there. You don't need an exit visa to move away from Texas. You say you don't even want to drive through some states and I bet they don't care. Our states have far from uniform laws and customs. They are decided by the people who live there and if you don't, they don't care what you think. There are plenty on northeastern laws that are just as objectionable to Texans. Houston has no "zoning". The people who live there are happy with that. If they aren't MOVE. You can go to Chicago or New York where the nanny state will regulate every facet of your life from the gun you can own, the "required" conduit in your wall or the soft drinks you can't buy. Wow. Worst response ever. Many people live where they live because they don't have the ability to move somewhere else. The Supreme Court has ruled that abortion is legal. What the backwards states have done is game the system to shove the religious beliefs of their legislators and governors onto the people. Tell me again why they can't move. Also... The citizens elected those legislators, not you. You have no right to say what their laws are. O'Malley would not get more than single digits in Texas and Texans have no right to complain about the laws of Maryland. They don't like it, they can do what I did, MOVE. My move was far from painless but I did it because I had no interest in living there. Some people don't have the financial resources to move. Poor people without resources don't exist in Greg's world, apparently. Also, abortions are *legal* in the United States. What these several states are doing is skirting the federal law that allows abortion. Which law did they break? Be specific. You should add, where did women lose the right to abortion on demand? Be specific? |
Rapprochement?
On 9/27/2013 3:46 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 2:49 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:06:32 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 12:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:46:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 11:32 AM, wrote: "Efforts"? The question was whether the service was unavailable, not whether it was unpopular. BTW there are hospitals in DC that don't do "abortions". (although you can get a procedure that terminates a pregnancy) The "efforts" to shut down womens' health clinics is pretty successful. Don't you see the news? As for DC, there literally are dozens of good hospitals in our metro area. That some religiously sponsored hospitals, Catholic hospitals, for example, might not perform an abortion doesn't mean you have to drive far to find a hospital that will perform one. It's not like being in Kansas or some other backwards state. Nobody makes people live there. You don't need an exit visa to move away from Texas. You say you don't even want to drive through some states and I bet they don't care. Our states have far from uniform laws and customs. They are decided by the people who live there and if you don't, they don't care what you think. There are plenty on northeastern laws that are just as objectionable to Texans. Houston has no "zoning". The people who live there are happy with that. If they aren't MOVE. You can go to Chicago or New York where the nanny state will regulate every facet of your life from the gun you can own, the "required" conduit in your wall or the soft drinks you can't buy. Wow. Worst response ever. Many people live where they live because they don't have the ability to move somewhere else. The Supreme Court has ruled that abortion is legal. What the backwards states have done is game the system to shove the religious beliefs of their legislators and governors onto the people. Tell me again why they can't move. Also... The citizens elected those legislators, not you. You have no right to say what their laws are. O'Malley would not get more than single digits in Texas and Texans have no right to complain about the laws of Maryland. They don't like it, they can do what I did, MOVE. My move was far from painless but I did it because I had no interest in living there. Some people don't have the financial resources to move. Poor people without resources don't exist in Greg's world, apparently. Also, abortions are *legal* in the United States. What these several states are doing is skirting the federal law that allows abortion. Abortions used to be legal in the first trimester. Now it seems the baby can be aborted as long as part of the baby is still in the birth canal. Feet exit, then it is murder. Matter of a quart we inch. How many abortions are needed at 9 months to save a mothers life? Zero, it's murder, plain and simple... |
Rapprochement?
In article ,
says... On 9/27/2013 3:34 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:53:00 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 2:49 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:06:32 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 12:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:46:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 9/27/13 11:32 AM, wrote: "Efforts"? The question was whether the service was unavailable, not whether it was unpopular. BTW there are hospitals in DC that don't do "abortions". (although you can get a procedure that terminates a pregnancy) The "efforts" to shut down womens' health clinics is pretty successful. Don't you see the news? As for DC, there literally are dozens of good hospitals in our metro area. That some religiously sponsored hospitals, Catholic hospitals, for example, might not perform an abortion doesn't mean you have to drive far to find a hospital that will perform one. It's not like being in Kansas or some other backwards state. Nobody makes people live there. You don't need an exit visa to move away from Texas. You say you don't even want to drive through some states and I bet they don't care. Our states have far from uniform laws and customs. They are decided by the people who live there and if you don't, they don't care what you think. There are plenty on northeastern laws that are just as objectionable to Texans. Houston has no "zoning". The people who live there are happy with that. If they aren't MOVE. You can go to Chicago or New York where the nanny state will regulate every facet of your life from the gun you can own, the "required" conduit in your wall or the soft drinks you can't buy. Wow. Worst response ever. Many people live where they live because they don't have the ability to move somewhere else. The Supreme Court has ruled that abortion is legal. What the backwards states have done is game the system to shove the religious beliefs of their legislators and governors onto the people. Tell me again why they can't move. Also... The citizens elected those legislators, not you. You have no right to say what their laws are. O'Malley would not get more than single digits in Texas and Texans have no right to complain about the laws of Maryland. They don't like it, they can do what I did, MOVE. My move was far from painless but I did it because I had no interest in living there. Some people don't have the financial resources to move. Poor people without resources don't exist in Greg's world, apparently. Also, abortions are *legal* in the United States. What these several states are doing is skirting the federal law that allows abortion. Which law did they break? Be specific. You should add, where did women lose the right to abortion on demand? Be specific? Gee, imagine that, Jawbone Scotty was talking pure bull****!! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com