BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   To John, BAR, Greg, Richard, FlaJim, and .... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/158249-john-bar-greg-richard-flajim.html)

John H[_2_] September 9th 13 04:24 PM

To John, BAR, Greg, Richard, FlaJim, and ....
 
On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 19:42:12 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

...other fellow veterans.

I especially appreciate #11

http://www.upworthy.com/hahaha-so-tr...red-of-hearing


Love 'em all, but #11 is a true winner.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

Mr. Luddite[_2_] September 9th 13 04:24 PM

To John, BAR, Greg, Richard, FlaJim, and ....
 


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 9/9/13 10:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 9/9/13 10:26 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...


I think we *win* when we sent our military forces into
underdeveloped
countries to provide disaster relief, food, medical care, potable
water,
repairing of light infrastructure, et cetera, with everything
marked as
"A Gift from the People of the United States," or when we align
with
other major powers to serve as peacekeepers. Taking sides in civil
wars
when the new guys are as bad as the old guys doesn't seem to work
out
for us.

------------------------------

Those goals are not ... and have never been ... the purpose of our
military.

The military is for fighting and winning wars or major military
conflicts.
Peacemaking, disaster relief, medical care, etc., is best
performed by
other organizations.



We don't have major military conflicts or wars anymore, unless we
create
them, and history the last 70 years pretty much shows we shouldn't
be
fighting wars or major military conflicts.

Working in the ways I've described will increase the prestige and
esteem
of this nation around the world, and it will give the military
something
actually *useful and helpful* to do.

------------------------

Again, that's not the purpose of the military. The military forces
are
trained and maintained to deal with threats to our national
interests
and to maintain a strong deterrent to foreign aggression .

The National Guard (mostly reservists) are occasionally called upon
to
help with domestic natural disasters or civil unrest that threaten
civilians, however their role is usually secondary to local law
enforcement.

Sometimes you appear to have an unrealistic, utopian view of the
world. Without the strong military capability that we have, we
probably wouldn't be the USA today.




I understand what the purpose of the military is. The problems seem to
arise when the military is used actively as the military.

---------------------------

I disagree. The problems arise when the military is actively used for
purposes it is not intended and politicians try to rely on it to
solve diplomatic or foreign policy issues like nation building.





John H[_2_] September 9th 13 04:32 PM

To John, BAR, Greg, Richard, FlaJim, and ....
 
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 10:48:57 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote:



"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 9/9/13 10:26 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...


I think we *win* when we sent our military forces into
underdeveloped
countries to provide disaster relief, food, medical care, potable
water,
repairing of light infrastructure, et cetera, with everything marked
as
"A Gift from the People of the United States," or when we align with
other major powers to serve as peacekeepers. Taking sides in civil
wars
when the new guys are as bad as the old guys doesn't seem to work
out
for us.

------------------------------

Those goals are not ... and have never been ... the purpose of our
military.

The military is for fighting and winning wars or major military
conflicts.
Peacemaking, disaster relief, medical care, etc., is best performed
by
other organizations.



We don't have major military conflicts or wars anymore, unless we
create
them, and history the last 70 years pretty much shows we shouldn't be
fighting wars or major military conflicts.

Working in the ways I've described will increase the prestige and
esteem
of this nation around the world, and it will give the military
something
actually *useful and helpful* to do.

------------------------

Again, that's not the purpose of the military. The military forces
are trained and maintained to deal with threats to our national
interests and to maintain a strong deterrent to foreign aggression .

The National Guard (mostly reservists) are occasionally called upon
to help with domestic natural disasters or civil unrest that threaten
civilians, however their role is usually secondary to local law
enforcement.

Sometimes you appear to have an unrealistic, utopian view of the
world. Without the strong military capability that we have, we
probably wouldn't be the USA today.



You're doing a pretty good job, definitely devoting a lot more time to FQAD then he deserves.

However, members of the National Guard are not called 'reservists'. Members of the US Army Reserve
are called Reservists. Both organizations are part of the Reserve components, but they're quite
different.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

John H[_2_] September 9th 13 04:32 PM

To John, BAR, Greg, Richard, FlaJim, and ....
 
On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:58:24 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 9/9/13 10:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 9/9/13 10:26 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...


I think we *win* when we sent our military forces into underdeveloped
countries to provide disaster relief, food, medical care, potable water,
repairing of light infrastructure, et cetera, with everything marked as
"A Gift from the People of the United States," or when we align with
other major powers to serve as peacekeepers. Taking sides in civil wars
when the new guys are as bad as the old guys doesn't seem to work out
for us.

------------------------------

Those goals are not ... and have never been ... the purpose of our
military.

The military is for fighting and winning wars or major military
conflicts.
Peacemaking, disaster relief, medical care, etc., is best performed by
other organizations.



We don't have major military conflicts or wars anymore, unless we create
them, and history the last 70 years pretty much shows we shouldn't be
fighting wars or major military conflicts.

Working in the ways I've described will increase the prestige and esteem
of this nation around the world, and it will give the military something
actually *useful and helpful* to do.

------------------------

Again, that's not the purpose of the military. The military forces are
trained and maintained to deal with threats to our national interests
and to maintain a strong deterrent to foreign aggression .

The National Guard (mostly reservists) are occasionally called upon to
help with domestic natural disasters or civil unrest that threaten
civilians, however their role is usually secondary to local law
enforcement.

Sometimes you appear to have an unrealistic, utopian view of the
world. Without the strong military capability that we have, we
probably wouldn't be the USA today.




I understand what the purpose of the military is. The problems seem to
arise when the military is used actively as the military.


....which is a political call. Liberal politicians tend to screw it up a lot.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

F.O.A.D. September 9th 13 04:33 PM

To John, BAR, Greg, Richard, FlaJim, and ....
 
On 9/9/13 11:24 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 9/9/13 10:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 9/9/13 10:26 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...


I think we *win* when we sent our military forces into underdeveloped
countries to provide disaster relief, food, medical care, potable water,
repairing of light infrastructure, et cetera, with everything marked as
"A Gift from the People of the United States," or when we align with
other major powers to serve as peacekeepers. Taking sides in civil wars
when the new guys are as bad as the old guys doesn't seem to work out
for us.

------------------------------

Those goals are not ... and have never been ... the purpose of our
military.

The military is for fighting and winning wars or major military
conflicts.
Peacemaking, disaster relief, medical care, etc., is best performed by
other organizations.



We don't have major military conflicts or wars anymore, unless we create
them, and history the last 70 years pretty much shows we shouldn't be
fighting wars or major military conflicts.

Working in the ways I've described will increase the prestige and esteem
of this nation around the world, and it will give the military something
actually *useful and helpful* to do.

------------------------

Again, that's not the purpose of the military. The military forces are
trained and maintained to deal with threats to our national interests
and to maintain a strong deterrent to foreign aggression .

The National Guard (mostly reservists) are occasionally called upon to
help with domestic natural disasters or civil unrest that threaten
civilians, however their role is usually secondary to local law
enforcement.

Sometimes you appear to have an unrealistic, utopian view of the
world. Without the strong military capability that we have, we
probably wouldn't be the USA today.




I understand what the purpose of the military is. The problems seem to
arise when the military is used actively as the military.

---------------------------

I disagree. The problems arise when the military is actively used for
purposes it is not intended and politicians try to rely on it to solve
diplomatic or foreign policy issues like nation building.





Use of the military is almost always a political call.

iBoaterer[_3_] September 9th 13 04:35 PM

To John, BAR, Greg, Richard, FlaJim, and ....
 
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 10:48:57 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote:



"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 9/9/13 10:26 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...


I think we *win* when we sent our military forces into
underdeveloped
countries to provide disaster relief, food, medical care, potable
water,
repairing of light infrastructure, et cetera, with everything marked
as
"A Gift from the People of the United States," or when we align with
other major powers to serve as peacekeepers. Taking sides in civil
wars
when the new guys are as bad as the old guys doesn't seem to work
out
for us.

------------------------------

Those goals are not ... and have never been ... the purpose of our
military.

The military is for fighting and winning wars or major military
conflicts.
Peacemaking, disaster relief, medical care, etc., is best performed
by
other organizations.



We don't have major military conflicts or wars anymore, unless we
create
them, and history the last 70 years pretty much shows we shouldn't be
fighting wars or major military conflicts.

Working in the ways I've described will increase the prestige and
esteem
of this nation around the world, and it will give the military
something
actually *useful and helpful* to do.

------------------------

Again, that's not the purpose of the military. The military forces
are trained and maintained to deal with threats to our national
interests and to maintain a strong deterrent to foreign aggression .

The National Guard (mostly reservists) are occasionally called upon
to help with domestic natural disasters or civil unrest that threaten
civilians, however their role is usually secondary to local law
enforcement.

Sometimes you appear to have an unrealistic, utopian view of the
world. Without the strong military capability that we have, we
probably wouldn't be the USA today.



You're doing a pretty good job, definitely devoting a lot more time to FQAD then he deserves.

However, members of the National Guard are not called 'reservists'. Members of the US Army Reserve
are called Reservists. Both organizations are part of the Reserve components, but they're quite
different.

John (Gun Nut) H.


How much time to rec.boats participants "deserve"? And who are you to
tell someone else that they are giving a particular person too much
time?

F.O.A.D. September 9th 13 04:37 PM

To John, BAR, Greg, Richard, FlaJim, and ....
 
On 9/9/13 11:35 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 10:48:57 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote:



"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 9/9/13 10:26 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...


I think we *win* when we sent our military forces into
underdeveloped
countries to provide disaster relief, food, medical care, potable
water,
repairing of light infrastructure, et cetera, with everything marked
as
"A Gift from the People of the United States," or when we align with
other major powers to serve as peacekeepers. Taking sides in civil
wars
when the new guys are as bad as the old guys doesn't seem to work
out
for us.

------------------------------

Those goals are not ... and have never been ... the purpose of our
military.

The military is for fighting and winning wars or major military
conflicts.
Peacemaking, disaster relief, medical care, etc., is best performed
by
other organizations.



We don't have major military conflicts or wars anymore, unless we
create
them, and history the last 70 years pretty much shows we shouldn't be
fighting wars or major military conflicts.

Working in the ways I've described will increase the prestige and
esteem
of this nation around the world, and it will give the military
something
actually *useful and helpful* to do.

------------------------

Again, that's not the purpose of the military. The military forces
are trained and maintained to deal with threats to our national
interests and to maintain a strong deterrent to foreign aggression .

The National Guard (mostly reservists) are occasionally called upon
to help with domestic natural disasters or civil unrest that threaten
civilians, however their role is usually secondary to local law
enforcement.

Sometimes you appear to have an unrealistic, utopian view of the
world. Without the strong military capability that we have, we
probably wouldn't be the USA today.



You're doing a pretty good job, definitely devoting a lot more time to FQAD then he deserves.

However, members of the National Guard are not called 'reservists'. Members of the US Army Reserve
are called Reservists. Both organizations are part of the Reserve components, but they're quite
different.

John (Gun Nut) H.


How much time to rec.boats participants "deserve"? And who are you to
tell someone else that they are giving a particular person too much
time?



There you go again, taking Herring the Racist seriously. :)

Hank©[_3_] September 9th 13 06:13 PM

To John, BAR, Greg, Richard, FlaJim, and ....
 
On 9/9/2013 8:19 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 9/9/13 7:38 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, September 9, 2013 5:48:24 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 9/8/13 10:42 PM, Tim wrote:

...other fellow veterans.



I especially appreciate #11



http://www.upworthy.com/hahaha-so-tr...red-of-hearing








Yeah, because U.S. military adventurism has turned out so well for us

since the end of World War II, eh?


Harry, you should have taken advantage of it while you could have. I
enjoyed my stint.


Sorry, Tim, but I was never drafted and signing up just encourages
militarism. Beside, I thought getting an education and starting a career
were more important than killing SE Asians who posed no threat to the
United States.


We understand. You getting accepted into any college was a minor
miracle. That's probably why you think so highly of that feat.

BAR[_2_] September 10th 13 01:45 AM

To John, BAR, Greg, Richard, FlaJim, and ....
 
In article ,
says...

On Sunday, September 8, 2013 9:42:12 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
...other fellow veterans.



I especially appreciate #11



http://www.upworthy.com/hahaha-so-tr...red-of-hearing

#5's reply isn't bad either...


Tim, the movie is Full Metal Jacket!!!



BAR[_2_] September 10th 13 01:45 AM

To John, BAR, Greg, Richard, FlaJim, and ....
 
In article , says...

On 9/8/13 10:42 PM, Tim wrote:
...other fellow veterans.

I especially appreciate #11

http://www.upworthy.com/hahaha-so-tr...red-of-hearing



Yeah, because U.S. military adventurism has turned out so well for us
since the end of World War II, eh?


You must have missed everything that happened just a couple of decades before and a few
decades after the Civil War. Then there were the banana republic wars.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com