Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,069
Default Our great capitalist society...

In article ,
says...

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...


Because they weren't intended to be interstate bridges.

------------------------------

A bridge on *Interstate Route 95" is not an interstate bridge?


Whoooosh...... I'll try again. In cities, where interstates were
extended, added, spurs, etc. were placed long after the original
interstate system was in place. A lot of these add ons were aligned to
take advantage of in-place roadways including bridges, tunnels etc.
These in-place infrastructures were not intended to carry the traffic
that interstate travel imposes.

-----------------------------

Sorry. I don't buy that at all. As pointed out in a previous post, a
roadway or bridge that is "added" to the federal interstate roadway
system must be built or upgraded to the specifications contained in
DOT and specifically the Federal Highway Commission requirements.
The requirements and specs today are much more stringent than they
were back in the 50's and certainly more stringent than those for
non-federal, local roads.

Go ahead and type your four-letter word starting with "C".


I've never used Scotty's word, where do you get that idea? Also, I
posted an example of a bridge that was re-purposed and certainly does
not meet federal DOT guidelines. Where did you get the idea that they
must be upgraded to meet those guidelines?
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Our great capitalist society...



"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...


Because they weren't intended to be interstate bridges.

------------------------------

A bridge on *Interstate Route 95" is not an interstate bridge?


Whoooosh...... I'll try again. In cities, where interstates were
extended, added, spurs, etc. were placed long after the original
interstate system was in place. A lot of these add ons were aligned
to
take advantage of in-place roadways including bridges, tunnels etc.
These in-place infrastructures were not intended to carry the
traffic
that interstate travel imposes.

-----------------------------

Sorry. I don't buy that at all. As pointed out in a previous post,
a
roadway or bridge that is "added" to the federal interstate roadway
system must be built or upgraded to the specifications contained in
DOT and specifically the Federal Highway Commission requirements.
The requirements and specs today are much more stringent than they
were back in the 50's and certainly more stringent than those for
non-federal, local roads.

Go ahead and type your four-letter word starting with "C".


I've never used Scotty's word, where do you get that idea? Also, I
posted an example of a bridge that was re-purposed and certainly does
not meet federal DOT guidelines. Where did you get the idea that they
must be upgraded to meet those guidelines?

------------------------

About 30 seconds of proficient Googling will yield the answer to your
question.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More gimme society... [email protected] General 11 July 25th 12 06:00 PM
The Capitalist Imperative... Zombie of Woodstock General 2 April 27th 09 02:59 PM
The Great Society = The Great Failure Bob Crantz ASA 8 April 21st 07 12:28 AM
OT You know society is too litagious when.... Martin Baxter ASA 63 October 28th 06 05:14 PM
Why Conservatives are Ruining Society Curtis CCR General 9 March 20th 05 07:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017