Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... Because they weren't intended to be interstate bridges. ------------------------------ A bridge on *Interstate Route 95" is not an interstate bridge? Whoooosh...... I'll try again. In cities, where interstates were extended, added, spurs, etc. were placed long after the original interstate system was in place. A lot of these add ons were aligned to take advantage of in-place roadways including bridges, tunnels etc. These in-place infrastructures were not intended to carry the traffic that interstate travel imposes. ----------------------------- Sorry. I don't buy that at all. As pointed out in a previous post, a roadway or bridge that is "added" to the federal interstate roadway system must be built or upgraded to the specifications contained in DOT and specifically the Federal Highway Commission requirements. The requirements and specs today are much more stringent than they were back in the 50's and certainly more stringent than those for non-federal, local roads. Go ahead and type your four-letter word starting with "C". I've never used Scotty's word, where do you get that idea? Also, I posted an example of a bridge that was re-purposed and certainly does not meet federal DOT guidelines. Where did you get the idea that they must be upgraded to meet those guidelines? ------------------------ About 30 seconds of proficient Googling will yield the answer to your question. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More gimme society... | General | |||
The Capitalist Imperative... | General | |||
The Great Society = The Great Failure | ASA | |||
OT You know society is too litagious when.... | ASA | |||
Why Conservatives are Ruining Society | General |