On 8/25/2013 9:51 AM, wrote:
On Sunday, August 25, 2013 7:13:10 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/25/13 1:52 AM, wrote:

On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 15:55:39 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



...South Carolina.



It sounds like that is what they want.





What? Racism that excludes people of color from being served in a
restaurant? I agree, that is what many people in Maryland, home of the KKK, want.

There, I fixed it for you.


Funny, The article I saw didn't mention race at all.. I got the idea the
group was disruptive... I guess a racist might dig deeper, but we see
what passes as "racism" lately soooooooo.....

On 8/25/13 10:35 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/25/2013 9:51 AM, wrote:
On Sunday, August 25, 2013 7:13:10 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/25/13 1:52 AM, wrote:

On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 15:55:39 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



...South Carolina.



It sounds like that is what they want.





What? Racism that excludes people of color from being served in a
restaurant? I agree, that is what many people in Maryland, home of
the KKK, want.

There, I fixed it for you.


Funny, The article I saw didn't mention race at all.. I got the idea the
group was disruptive... I guess a racist might dig deeper, but we see
what passes as "racism" lately soooooooo.....


Look in the mirror...you'll see a racist.

In article ,
says...

On 8/25/2013 9:51 AM, wrote:
On Sunday, August 25, 2013 7:13:10 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/25/13 1:52 AM, wrote:

On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 15:55:39 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



...South Carolina.



It sounds like that is what they want.





What? Racism that excludes people of color from being served in a
restaurant? I agree, that is what many people in Maryland, home of the KKK, want.

There, I fixed it for you.


Funny, The article I saw didn't mention race at all.. I got the idea the
group was disruptive... I guess a racist might dig deeper, but we see
what passes as "racism" lately soooooooo.....

Do you mean like you calling people the "N" word, racist?

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/25/13 1:52 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 15:55:39 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

...South Carolina.

It sounds like that is what they want.


What? Racism that excludes people of color from being served in a
restaurant? I agree, that is what many people in South Carolina want.

If they had 25 and no reservations, I would be very assured they would have
to wait for seating. Most semi popular restaurants would not save seating
for a possible 25 size party. They would be out of business shortly.

On Sunday, August 25, 2013 10:54:05 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:


Look in the mirror...you'll see a racist.

I see you already have....

On Saturday, August 24, 2013 2:55:39 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Ahh, the unreconstructed racism of South Carolina. .

No, that's the ;racism' of the manager in that certain establishment.

Where do you get these wild notions, Harry?

On 8/25/13 5:24 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, August 24, 2013 2:55:39 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Ahh, the unreconstructed racism of South Carolina. .

No, that's the ;racism' of the manager in that certain establishment.

Where do you get these wild notions, Harry?


The manager and the patron.

On Sunday, August 25, 2013 4:32:10 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

The manager and the patron.


And they represent the entire state of S.Carolina?

wow...

On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:12:08 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Sunday, August 25, 2013 4:32:10 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

The manager and the patron.


And they represent the entire state of S.Carolina?

wow...

======

A statistical sample of exactly *two*.

In all fairness to the manager, not to mention the people of South
Carolina, we don't really know all that transpired here. There might
have been perfectly valid reasons for refusing them service such as
loud, disruptive or beligerant behavior. It is inappropriate to play
the race card without knowing the facts.

On Sunday, August 25, 2013 9:43:09 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote:

======



A statistical sample of exactly *two*.



In all fairness to the manager, not to mention the people of South

Carolina, we don't really know all that transpired here. There might

have been perfectly valid reasons for refusing them service such as

loud, disruptive or belligerent behavior. It is inappropriate to play

the race card without knowing the facts.

Absolutely right, Wayne. But Harry didn't present the article with that thought in mind.