Do I need this?
 

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 11:19:40 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Responding to him simply

eggs his demented mind on.

Sorry, but my "demented mind" as you call it, works on its own. Donnie is a marked man

And you, luddite, are just another asswipe sock-puppet.

Do I need this?
 

On 8/22/2013 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"Tim" wrote in message
...

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote:
Beautiful gun. Nice price.



http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5



John (Gun Nut) H.


For that price?

YES!

----------------------------

I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired
one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has
determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined
to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new
or used.

Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed
legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard
to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a

1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The
purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a felony,
punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer.

2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds
(standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year.
Only 7 round magazines will be permitted.

3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health
histories.

4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes.

5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new,
including .22lr.

6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance.

7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever
*that* means).

8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons
at gun shows.

9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed
dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically.

10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited
gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything
else they can dream up and get passed.

Status:

The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds
through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a
vote.



I would expect nothing less from the police state of Mass, after all,
those little police depts outside Boston and Worcester, north of the
TPK, are exactly the kind of "government" the framers were thinking of
when they wrote the Second Amendment into the Constitution...

Do I need this?
 

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 6:29:51 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:


Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed

legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with

regard to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General

Laws a



1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The

purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a

felony,

punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer.



2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more

rounds (standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one

year.

Only 7 round magazines will be permitted.



3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health

histories.



4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes.



5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new,

including .22lr.



6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance.



7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever

*that* means).



8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing

weapons at gun shows.



9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed

dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically.



10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited

gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything

else they can dream up and get passed.



Status:



The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the

rounds through the various required hearings before going to the

capital for a vote.

I'm sure the criminal element is paying close attention, Richard...

Do I need this?
 

"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 8/22/2013 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"Tim" wrote in message
...

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote:
Beautiful gun. Nice price.



http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5



John (Gun Nut) H.


For that price?

YES!

----------------------------

I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired
one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has
determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being
determined
to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one,
new
or used.

Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed
legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with
regard
to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws
a

1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The
purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a
felony,
punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer.

2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more
rounds
(standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year.
Only 7 round magazines will be permitted.

3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health
histories.

4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes.

5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or
new,
including .22lr.

6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance.

7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever
*that* means).

8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing
weapons
at gun shows.

9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed
dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically.

10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited
gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything
else they can dream up and get passed.

Status:

The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the
rounds
through the various required hearings before going to the capital
for a
vote.



I would expect nothing less from the police state of Mass, after all,
those little police depts outside Boston and Worcester, north of the
TPK, are exactly the kind of "government" the framers were thinking of
when they wrote the Second Amendment into the Constitution...

-------------------------------------

It's not the police departments looking for these "enhanced" laws.
They are the brainchild of Patrick Deval and a group of anti-gun
advocates.

Do I need this?
 

On 8/22/13 10:01 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:24:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 8/22/13 9:18 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:20:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



Liability insurance may mean that those who are shot by guns owned by
people with coverage may be entitled to some sort of compensation. That
seems reasonable.

Paid for by everyone, even those who don't own guns. That is what
insurance is.



Now there's an idea...force gun owners to get liability insurance and
then let everyone who isn't a gun owner know they are subsidizing the
gun owners.

Liability Insurance is just a way to make lawyers rich. It figures you
want more of it.
Maybe we should tell everyone who pays for liability insurance that
lawyers get a third to a half of all claims for basically doing
nothing but driving up the amount of the claim. That does not include
the money the insurance company lawyer gets, effectively making the
cost of the claim about 3-4 times as much as the injured party ends up
with.,

Now get out your checkbook and pay that insurance bill, sucker.


Uh huh. So I suppose you don't have liability insurance on your car or
homeowners insurance in case someone is injured on your property, right?

Do I need this?
 

On 8/22/13 11:19 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"True North" wrote in message
...

There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again.
There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your
'fustrations'.

----------------------

I hope you realize that the only reason the dip**** "slammer" ever shows
up in this newsgroup is because you respond to him.
Everyone else either has him filtered or simply ignore his pathetic
comments.

Do us a favor, will you? Ignore him. Responding to him simply eggs
his demented mind on.



He seems to be the clone of where PsychoSnotty will be in a couple of
years.

Do I need this?
 

On 8/22/2013 11:19 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"True North" wrote in message
...

There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again.
There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your
'fustrations'.

----------------------

I hope you realize that the only reason the dip**** "slammer" ever shows
up in this newsgroup is because you respond to him.
Everyone else either has him filtered or simply ignore his pathetic
comments.

Do us a favor, will you? Ignore him. Responding to him simply eggs
his demented mind on.



Donnie could also stop making the juvenile comments on each and ever
post which draws slammer out. Note, slammer is only answering don's
constant trolls... Just sayin'.

Do I need this?
 

On 8/22/2013 8:03 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 8/22/13 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"Tim" wrote in message
...

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote:
Beautiful gun. Nice price.



http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5



John (Gun Nut) H.


For that price?

YES!

----------------------------

I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired
one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has
determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined
to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new
or used.

Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed
legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard
to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a

1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The
purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a
felony,
punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer.

2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds
(standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year.
Only 7 round magazines will be permitted.

3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health
histories.

4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes.

5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new,
including .22lr.

6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance.

7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever
*that* means).

8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons
at gun shows.

9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed
dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically.

10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited
gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything
else they can dream up and get passed.

Status:

The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds
through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a
vote.




Sounds pretty good to me.

---------------------

Of course.

I can understand the reasoning of some, but not all of the proposed law
changes.

To my knowledge, MA would be the first state to require liability
insurance to own a firearm, if approved. Doesn't make sense to me. How
does having liability insurance make gun ownership safer to the general
public? Basically, it says, "If I am negligent and you get hurt or
killed, don't worry ... I am insured."

It is just another way to tax and track your guns...

Some of the others are just plain dumb and for effect only. Private
sales are already required to be electronically filed here. You do it
on-line and the state has a record of the transaction. Why do we now
have to pay a fee to a licensed dealer to record a private sale?

What set this off in my mind was doing some research for a friend of
mine. His wife just purchased a pre-ban Clock. Came with two, eleven
round magazines. Under the proposed legislation, pre-ban mags of 10
rounds or less will be allowed. Post ban magazines are currently
limited to seven rounds. If approved, she is legally obligated to
transfer her 11 round mags out of state or prove that they have been
destroyed by some form of not yet disclosed procedure.

Do I need this?
 

On 8/23/13 12:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/22/2013 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"Tim" wrote in message
...

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote:
Beautiful gun. Nice price.



http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5



John (Gun Nut) H.


For that price?

YES!

----------------------------

I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired
one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has
determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined
to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new
or used.

Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed
legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard
to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a

1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The
purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a
felony,
punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer.

2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds
(standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year.
Only 7 round magazines will be permitted.

3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health
histories.

4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes.

5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new,
including .22lr.

6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance.

7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever
*that* means).

8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons
at gun shows.

9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed
dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically.

10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited
gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything
else they can dream up and get passed.

Status:

The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds
through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a
vote.



I would expect nothing less from the police state of Mass, after all,
those little police depts outside Boston and Worcester, north of the
TPK, are exactly the kind of "government" the framers were thinking of
when they wrote the Second Amendment into the Constitution...

Actually, they weren't, but since you were not paying attention in
school the few days you attended...

Do I need this?
 

On 8/23/13 7:23 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/22/2013 11:19 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"True North" wrote in message
...

There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again.
There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your
'fustrations'.

----------------------

I hope you realize that the only reason the dip**** "slammer" ever shows
up in this newsgroup is because you respond to him.
Everyone else either has him filtered or simply ignore his pathetic
comments.

Do us a favor, will you? Ignore him. Responding to him simply eggs
his demented mind on.



Donnie could also stop making the juvenile comments on each and ever
post which draws slammer out. Note, slammer is only answering don's
constant trolls... Just sayin'.


*You* are the ranking and also rank expert on juvenile comments here,
****head.