| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:15:12 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
We could have helped out the city of Detroit, but we blew those trillions on Iraq and Afghanistan. === Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will eat for the rest of his life. How do you propose fixing Detroit's issues for the long term? They could blow through a trillion or two in no time at all. The auto industry is not coming back any time soon and that is what built Detroit in the first place. I know people in upstate NY who are still waiting for the paper and carpet making industies to come back, and they started leaving over 60 years ago. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 7/19/2013 4:35 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:15:12 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: We could have helped out the city of Detroit, but we blew those trillions on Iraq and Afghanistan. No jackass, we blew it on the sell ou....er, bail out... We gave it to the Unions so they could party like it was 2099.... and they did. Now it's gone, and it's time to pay the bill. === Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will eat for the rest of his life. How do you propose fixing Detroit's issues for the long term? They could blow through a trillion or two in no time at all. The auto industry is not coming back any time soon and that is what built Detroit in the first place. I know people in upstate NY who are still waiting for the paper and carpet making industies to come back, and they started leaving over 60 years ago. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 7/19/13 5:36 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/19/2013 4:35 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:15:12 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: We could have helped out the city of Detroit, but we blew those trillions on Iraq and Afghanistan. No jackass, we blew it on the sell ou....er, bail out... We gave it to the Unions so they could party like it was 2099.... and they did. Now it's gone, and it's time to pay the bill. === That's absolutely complete bull****. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
That lil' Snottie guy is crazy as a bedbug.
|
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 7/20/13 4:58 PM, Eisboch wrote: "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... On 7/19/2013 4:35 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:15:12 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: We could have helped out the city of Detroit, but we blew those trillions on Iraq and Afghanistan. No jackass, we blew it on the sell ou....er, bail out... We gave it to the Unions so they could party like it was 2099.... and they did. Now it's gone, and it's time to pay the bill. === Please, enlighten all of us who don't think off the wall crazy ****. Show where the money went to the unions. ------------------------------------- GM filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy in 2009. Bankruptcy law requires that creditors to the bankrupt corporation receive equal treatment in terms of payments made to them. In other words, you can't pay one creditor 75-100 percent of what he is owed and another creditor only 25-50 percent. But in the case of GM, the union pension fund (VEBA) was given much higher priority compared to other unsecured vendors, bond holders and creditors. In the restructuring process GM was able to negotiate new pay scales and benefit packages for new hires but was not successful in reigning back costs significantly for existing union employees. As a result, GM still has the highest labor cost of any of it's competitors. As of July 3, 2013, the American taxpayers are still in the hole to the tune of $19 billion of the $50 billion GM bailout. That amount is just about equal to the cost of retaining the pre-bankruptcy union employees's payscale and benefit packages and is likely not to ever be recovered. This is what happens when employers are allowed to have unfunded pension liabilities. It's true at many corporations and municipalities, and it shouldn't be allowed. It's just another way for employers to screw their employees. Absolutely correct. And if this was the law, the California taxpayers would not be on the hook for hundreds of billions in unfunded state and local government union labor pensions. We would negotiate affordable contracts! |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 7/20/13 6:24 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/20/13 4:58 PM, Eisboch wrote: "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... On 7/19/2013 4:35 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:15:12 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: We could have helped out the city of Detroit, but we blew those trillions on Iraq and Afghanistan. No jackass, we blew it on the sell ou....er, bail out... We gave it to the Unions so they could party like it was 2099.... and they did. Now it's gone, and it's time to pay the bill. === Please, enlighten all of us who don't think off the wall crazy ****. Show where the money went to the unions. ------------------------------------- GM filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy in 2009. Bankruptcy law requires that creditors to the bankrupt corporation receive equal treatment in terms of payments made to them. In other words, you can't pay one creditor 75-100 percent of what he is owed and another creditor only 25-50 percent. But in the case of GM, the union pension fund (VEBA) was given much higher priority compared to other unsecured vendors, bond holders and creditors. In the restructuring process GM was able to negotiate new pay scales and benefit packages for new hires but was not successful in reigning back costs significantly for existing union employees. As a result, GM still has the highest labor cost of any of it's competitors. As of July 3, 2013, the American taxpayers are still in the hole to the tune of $19 billion of the $50 billion GM bailout. That amount is just about equal to the cost of retaining the pre-bankruptcy union employees's payscale and benefit packages and is likely not to ever be recovered. This is what happens when employers are allowed to have unfunded pension liabilities. It's true at many corporations and municipalities, and it shouldn't be allowed. It's just another way for employers to screw their employees. Absolutely correct. And if this was the law, the California taxpayers would not be on the hook for hundreds of billions in unfunded state and local government union labor pensions. We would negotiate affordable contracts! For many decades, state and local government employees gave up getting decent wages for good health care and pension plans. Now the righties want to **** them out of those, too. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Sailing schools in New York City area | Cruising | |||
| Accelerated USPS Boating Classes in New York City | ASA | |||
| WTB: 8 HP Outboard in New York City | Marketplace | |||
| Summer Boating Classes in New York City | ASA | |||