LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,069
Default Sharpton prediction

In article ,
says...

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...



What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

------------------------------------

The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony.
All
she did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs
and
review the report of the examination by the Physician
Assistant.


She was giving testimony AS an "expert WITNESS".

-----------------------------------------------

Read what you posted above. You made the statement, "What
"qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?"

She didn't "witness" any crime. She testified as a witness for
the
prosecution on her evaluation of Zimmerman's injuries based on
photos
and a PA's examination. What became contested was her statement
that
the injuries were a result of only two actions .... a punch in the
nose and a single "smash" of the head on the concrete walkway.


Oh, boy. It's VERY clear that like the FOXites, you've made up your
mind
already.

--------------------------------

I have not. I wish you would pay attention to what you post and
what
is posted as a response.

As it pertains to the medical examiner you stated:

What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

I answered that she was *not* a witness to a crime in this case.
She
was simply providing testimony regarding head wounds.

How do you conclude that I've "made up my mind" based on that?
I've stated several times that I don't know.


She IS a "witness". What was she called to the stand as? Someone who
knows nothing about the case, and has no experience in any aspect of
the
case?


_____________________________

I'll try one more time .

Contrary to you're statement, she *was NOT* a witness to any crime.
She simply examined photographs and reviewed the medical report of a
PA who examined Zimmerman.

Why do you have such a hard time understanding this?


Probably because you have a hard time understanding that she is INDEED a
"witness" for the court. If not, why would she be on the stand???


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What a prediction.... *e#c General 0 February 10th 11 06:54 PM
A prediction Frogwatch[_2_] General 21 June 20th 10 07:44 PM
A prediction Frogwatch[_2_] General 1 June 19th 10 01:19 AM
Obama prediction Frogwatch General 6 February 2nd 09 10:12 PM
With Regards to Al Sharpton Wilbur Hubbard ASA 0 May 10th 07 10:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017