Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpton prediction
On Friday, July 5, 2013 10:21:52 AM UTC-4, Hank© wrote :
Good luck with this. Many people before you have tried to repair Loogies thinker, and failed. ;-) Steroid damaged brain.....no hope....permanent retardation. |
#32
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpton prediction
On Friday, July 5, 2013 11:45:39 AM UTC-4, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 7/5/2013 10:21 AM, Hank� wrote: Kevin is smarter than you think.. he always manages to keep someone running in circles I don't think so, he's stupid enough to argue about ANYthing. Steroid damage. Total ****tard. |
#34
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpton prediction
In article m,
says... On 7/5/2013 9:57 AM, Eisboch wrote: "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... She IS a "witness". What was she called to the stand as? Someone who knows nothing about the case, and has no experience in any aspect of the case? _____________________________ I'll try one more time . Contrary to you're statement, she *was NOT* a witness to any crime. She simply examined photographs and reviewed the medical report of a PA who examined Zimmerman. Why do you have such a hard time understanding this? Probably because you have a hard time understanding that she is INDEED a "witness" for the court. If not, why would she be on the stand??? ----------------------------------------- The problem I have is understanding your line of logic in some of these discussions. This one started with you posing the question, "What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?" I merely pointed out that the ME did *not* witness a crime in this case. She testified *as* a witness her opinions of Zimmerman's injuries. Think of this way: In your question "witness" is a verb. In my response, "witness" is a noun. " Good luck with this. Many people before you have tried to repair Loogies thinker, and failed. ;-) Booger was way ahead of the curve and used too much pot before it became "legal". |
#35
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpton prediction
In article m,
says... On 7/5/2013 11:45 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 7/5/2013 10:21 AM, Hank© wrote: On 7/5/2013 9:57 AM, Eisboch wrote: "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... She IS a "witness". What was she called to the stand as? Someone who knows nothing about the case, and has no experience in any aspect of the case? _____________________________ I'll try one more time . Contrary to you're statement, she *was NOT* a witness to any crime. She simply examined photographs and reviewed the medical report of a PA who examined Zimmerman. Why do you have such a hard time understanding this? Probably because you have a hard time understanding that she is INDEED a "witness" for the court. If not, why would she be on the stand??? ----------------------------------------- The problem I have is understanding your line of logic in some of these discussions. This one started with you posing the question, "What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?" I merely pointed out that the ME did *not* witness a crime in this case. She testified *as* a witness her opinions of Zimmerman's injuries. Think of this way: In your question "witness" is a verb. In my response, "witness" is a noun. " Good luck with this. Many people before you have tried to repair Loogies thinker, and failed. ;-) Kevin is smarter than you think.. he always manages to keep someone running in circles Who, for instance? I don't know why anyone responds to Booger's posts. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What a prediction.... | General | |||
A prediction | General | |||
A prediction | General | |||
Obama prediction | General | |||
With Regards to Al Sharpton | ASA |