| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Sharpton prediction
|
|
#13
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sharpton prediction
In article ,
says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... The ME with the exemplary qualificaitons should have been able to not get hostile when the defense started asking her questions. What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime? ------------------------------------ The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony. All she did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and review the report of the examination by the Physician Assistant. It was based on the photos and the PA report that she determined that Zimmerman's injuries were "very minor". Somehow she was also able to determine that only one punch in the face and one "smashing" of his head on the concrete took place. When challenged on this determination on cross examination by defense she became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to admit that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the concrete walkway *could* have taken place. She was giving testimony AS an "expert WITNESS". |
|
#14
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sharpton prediction
"iBoaterer" wrote in message ... What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime? ------------------------------------ The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony. All she did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and review the report of the examination by the Physician Assistant. It was based on the photos and the PA report that she determined that Zimmerman's injuries were "very minor". Somehow she was also able to determine that only one punch in the face and one "smashing" of his head on the concrete took place. When challenged on this determination on cross examination by defense she became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to admit that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the concrete walkway *could* have taken place. She was giving testimony AS an "expert WITNESS". ----------------------------------------------- Read what you posted above. You made the statement, "What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?" She didn't "witness" any crime. She testified as a witness for the prosecution on her evaluation of Zimmerman's injuries based on photos and a PA's examination. What became contested was her statement that the injuries were a result of only two actions .... a punch in the nose and a single "smash" of the head on the concrete walkway. |
|
#15
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sharpton prediction
On 7/3/2013 10:20 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote: "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... The ME with the exemplary qualificaitons should have been able to not get hostile when the defense started asking her questions. What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime? ------------------------------------ The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony. All she did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and review the report of the examination by the Physician Assistant. It was based on the photos and the PA report that she determined that Zimmerman's injuries were "very minor". Somehow she was also able to determine that only one punch in the face and one "smashing" of his head on the concrete took place. When challenged on this determination on cross examination by defense she became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to admit that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the concrete walkway *could* have taken place. Dude Zimmerman bang his head on the concrete or punch himself first? Proper English? |
|
#16
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sharpton prediction
|
|
#17
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sharpton prediction
|
|
#18
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sharpton prediction
On 3 Jul 2013 14:20:22 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:
When challenged on this determination on cross examination by defense she became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to admit that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the concrete walkway *could* have taken place. Dude Zimmerman bang his head on the concrete or punch himself first? === Well dude he or duden't he? |
|
#19
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sharpton prediction
"iBoaterer" wrote in message ... What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime? ------------------------------------ The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony. All she did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and review the report of the examination by the Physician Assistant. She was giving testimony AS an "expert WITNESS". ----------------------------------------------- Read what you posted above. You made the statement, "What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?" She didn't "witness" any crime. She testified as a witness for the prosecution on her evaluation of Zimmerman's injuries based on photos and a PA's examination. What became contested was her statement that the injuries were a result of only two actions .... a punch in the nose and a single "smash" of the head on the concrete walkway. Oh, boy. It's VERY clear that like the FOXites, you've made up your mind already. -------------------------------- I have not. I wish you would pay attention to what you post and what is posted as a response. As it pertains to the medical examiner you stated: What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime? I answered that she was *not* a witness to a crime in this case. She was simply providing testimony regarding head wounds. How do you conclude that I've "made up my mind" based on that? I've stated several times that I don't know. |
|
#20
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sharpton prediction
In article , says...
"iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... The ME with the exemplary qualificaitons should have been able to not get hostile when the defense started asking her questions. What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime? ------------------------------------ The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony. All she did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs and review the report of the examination by the Physician Assistant. It was based on the photos and the PA report that she determined that Zimmerman's injuries were "very minor". Somehow she was also able to determine that only one punch in the face and one "smashing" of his head on the concrete took place. When challenged on this determination on cross examination by defense she became somewhat frustrated and hostile because she was forced to admit that more than one punch and more than one head banging on the concrete walkway *could* have taken place. It shows that the ME was biased and her qualifications weren't relied upon to come to her conclusion. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| What a prediction.... | General | |||
| A prediction | General | |||
| A prediction | General | |||
| Obama prediction | General | |||
| With Regards to Al Sharpton | ASA | |||
![Eisboch[_9_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Linear Mode
