Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 06:18:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
My opinion about the Zimmerman case matters no more than yours, Tim. I don't see the Martin kid's family getting justice for the murder of their son. === It is up to the jury to decide if he was murdered or not. My guess is not. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/3/13 2:06 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 06:18:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: My opinion about the Zimmerman case matters no more than yours, Tim. I don't see the Martin kid's family getting justice for the murder of their son. === It is up to the jury to decide if he was murdered or not. My guess is not. It's Florida, where it is perfectly ok to stalk someone physically, force a confrontation, and when you are called out on it, shoot the person you confronted. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 14:14:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 7/3/13 2:06 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 06:18:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: My opinion about the Zimmerman case matters no more than yours, Tim. I don't see the Martin kid's family getting justice for the murder of their son. === It is up to the jury to decide if he was murdered or not. My guess is not. It's Florida, where it is perfectly ok to stalk someone physically, force a confrontation, and when you are called out on it, shoot the person you confronted. === That's the version thay you and some of the mass media seem to prefer, but I haven't heard any trial testimony to that effect. You and Al Sharpton can go start riots together after the verdict is rendered. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/3/13 3:12 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 14:14:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/3/13 2:06 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 06:18:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: My opinion about the Zimmerman case matters no more than yours, Tim. I don't see the Martin kid's family getting justice for the murder of their son. === It is up to the jury to decide if he was murdered or not. My guess is not. It's Florida, where it is perfectly ok to stalk someone physically, force a confrontation, and when you are called out on it, shoot the person you confronted. === That's the version thay you and some of the mass media seem to prefer, but I haven't heard any trial testimony to that effect. You and Al Sharpton can go start riots together after the verdict is rendered. The stand your ground defense isn't being used in the Zimmerman murder case. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 7/3/13 3:12 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 14:14:50 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 7/3/13 2:06 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 06:18:03 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: My opinion about the Zimmerman case matters no more than yours, Tim. I don't see the Martin kid's family getting justice for the murder of their son. === It is up to the jury to decide if he was murdered or not. My guess is not. It's Florida, where it is perfectly ok to stalk someone physically, force a confrontation, and when you are called out on it, shoot the person you confronted. === That's the version thay you and some of the mass media seem to prefer, but I haven't heard any trial testimony to that effect. You and Al Sharpton can go start riots together after the verdict is rendered. The stand your ground defense isn't being used in the Zimmerman murder case. ---------------------------------------- True, he waived his right to a stand your ground defense to be determined without benefit of a jury. He retains the right to exercise it as a defense at a later date, according to his attorneys. It was considered a strategic move by his attorneys to avoid having it rejected by a judge. However, when it all comes down to it, the only difference is that a jury will decide if the shooting and killing of Martin was justified as self defense as opposed to a judge making the determination. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just heard something I had not heard before regarding the police
interrogation of George Zimmerman. According to Lisa Bloom, an attorney who was just on Chris Matthew's show, one of the police interrogations included a "bluff" directed to Zimmerman. He was told that they located a video of the entire altercation between him and Martin, presumably from a security camera within the gated community. According to Bloom, Zimmerman's reaction was "elation" and he thanked God there was a video record of the event. Lisa Bloom, btw, is of the opinion that Zimmerman is guilty of 2nd degree murder. However, she acknowledged that "if" the events happened as described by Zimmerman and he was having his head beaten on the concrete sidewalk, then yes, she would agree that an acquittal based on self defense would be appropriate. But the question remains. If this "bluff" was made and Zimmerman indeed reacted as he did ..... why? Lisa Bloom says it either means he is telling the truth or is a great actor. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A joke | General | |||
Joke of The Day... | General | |||
joke of the day... | General | |||
BCS a Sad Joke | General | |||
BCS a Sad Joke | General |