In article om,
says...

On 6/28/2013 8:08 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:18:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 6/27/13 8:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:56:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War ? SCOTUS strikes down DOMA
Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard

The DOMA decision is not the one that will start the civil war. SCOTUS
punting on Perry threw the question of state marriage laws back to the
states.
You can still have a couple married in California, considered
unmarried across the line in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon.

Yes, but their rights follow them.


Well, the jury is out on that one, but it appears that if a gay couple
from California moves to Backwardsville, Texas (that would be the entire
state), the state of Texas does not have to recognize that marriage.
What is going to happen is that there will be many lawsuits filed in the
states that don't recognize gay marriage, and eventually those barriers
will come down.

That may be true in the 9th circuit but it may not go the same way in
the 11th and the court did not give them any specific guidance.

Why wouldn't my Texas issued CCW permit be honored in California?


Because it isn't.

If a gaw marriage can be honored across state lines and a drivers license why isn't a CCW
permit.

On 6/28/2013 9:56 PM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 5:56:59 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...awwwww.



U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War – SCOTUS strikes down DOMA

Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard



Posted on Wed Jun 26 13:34:30 2013 by EXCH54FE



In a victory for sexual perverts in States where it is legal for

deviants to be married, The Supreme Court of the United States has spit

in the face of Almighty God and every true Christian in this country,

and ignored thousands of years of human history in which homosexual ACTS

have been tolerated by some, but never have they allowed to marry on a

de facto or de jure basis, by striking down the provisions of DOMA that

deny sexual deviants the same Federal benefits of marriage.



The error in this reasoning is that homosexuals are not a federally

recognized protected class, yet the majority court seems to have ignored

this axiom. The really disturbing part of this ruling on Doma is that it

opens the door for States to permit incestuous, polygamous, and

incestuous polygamous marriages; equal rights for all means ALL, right?

It appears that the Court did not think this through to its logical

conclusion.



(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../3035913/posts..



Yep. Pretty soon dogs will marry cats, wooden matches will marry pencil

sharpeners...

Harry, I didn't know you subscribed to freerepublic.com or Freedom Outpost for that matter. I don't read freerepublic and I'd not heard of freedom outpost. I'm surprised you read them..

wow.

Harry searches far and wide to find garbage suitable for him to read. As
the saying goes, "garbage in garbage out".

On 6/29/2013 9:25 AM, BAR wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 6/28/2013 8:08 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:18:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 6/27/13 8:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:56:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War ? SCOTUS strikes down DOMA
Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard

The DOMA decision is not the one that will start the civil war. SCOTUS
punting on Perry threw the question of state marriage laws back to the
states.
You can still have a couple married in California, considered
unmarried across the line in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon.

Yes, but their rights follow them.


Well, the jury is out on that one, but it appears that if a gay couple
from California moves to Backwardsville, Texas (that would be the entire
state), the state of Texas does not have to recognize that marriage.
What is going to happen is that there will be many lawsuits filed in the
states that don't recognize gay marriage, and eventually those barriers
will come down.

That may be true in the 9th circuit but it may not go the same way in
the 11th and the court did not give them any specific guidance.

Why wouldn't my Texas issued CCW permit be honored in California?


Because it isn't.

If a gaw marriage can be honored across state lines and a drivers license why isn't a CCW
permit.

You're asking the wrong person. If you need insight into the affairs of
homosexuals. ask Harry Krause. If you want my opinion, homosexuals are a
minority special interest group and the government goes out of it's way
to accommodate such groups in order to appear to appease the growing
progressive asshole group.

On 6/29/13 9:46 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:24:40 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:08:53 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:18:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 6/27/13 8:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:56:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War ? SCOTUS strikes down DOMA
Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard

The DOMA decision is not the one that will start the civil war. SCOTUS
punting on Perry threw the question of state marriage laws back to the
states.
You can still have a couple married in California, considered
unmarried across the line in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon.

Yes, but their rights follow them.


Well, the jury is out on that one, but it appears that if a gay couple
from California moves to Backwardsville, Texas (that would be the entire
state), the state of Texas does not have to recognize that marriage.
What is going to happen is that there will be many lawsuits filed in the
states that don't recognize gay marriage, and eventually those barriers
will come down.

That may be true in the 9th circuit but it may not go the same way in
the 11th and the court did not give them any specific guidance.

Why wouldn't my Texas issued CCW permit be honored in California?

I dunno. The same reason it is not honored in:

Connecticut, District of Columbia, Guam, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, New York
City, Ohio, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Virgin Islands,
Washington, American Samoa, Illinois, N. Mariana Islands?

If a marriage "can" be force to be recognized by other states then surely a CCW permit is
just the same.

I agree.


There is no federal law that requires one state to recognize marriages
performed in another state. What the Supremes did was rule DOMA was
unConstitutional. DOMA stipulated that certain federal financial perks
and other similar benefits accrued to only male-female married couples.

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 6/29/13 9:46 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:24:40 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:08:53 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:18:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

On 6/27/13 8:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:56:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War ? SCOTUS strikes
down DOMA
Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard

The DOMA decision is not the one that will start the civil
war. SCOTUS
punting on Perry threw the question of state marriage laws
back to the
states.
You can still have a couple married in California,
considered
unmarried across the line in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon.

Yes, but their rights follow them.


Well, the jury is out on that one, but it appears that if a gay
couple
from California moves to Backwardsville, Texas (that would be
the entire
state), the state of Texas does not have to recognize that
marriage.
What is going to happen is that there will be many lawsuits
filed in the
states that don't recognize gay marriage, and eventually those
barriers
will come down.

That may be true in the 9th circuit but it may not go the same
way in
the 11th and the court did not give them any specific guidance.

Why wouldn't my Texas issued CCW permit be honored in California?

I dunno. The same reason it is not honored in:

Connecticut, District of Columbia, Guam, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, New
York
City, Ohio, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Virgin Islands,
Washington, American Samoa, Illinois, N. Mariana Islands?

If a marriage "can" be force to be recognized by other states then
surely a CCW permit is
just the same.

I agree.


There is no federal law that requires one state to recognize marriages
performed in another state. What the Supremes did was rule DOMA was
unConstitutional. DOMA stipulated that certain federal financial perks
and other similar benefits accrued to only male-female married
couples.

-------------------------------------

Unless the states eventually stop worrying about where you were
married (like they do for heterosexual couples) the gay rights groups
will soon be pressing for a federal law that forces recognition of gay
marriages uniformly throughout the country.

If that happens, then I want to be able to travel anywhere in the
country carrying a firearm. Fair is fair. :-)

On 6/29/13 11:02 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 6/29/13 9:46 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:24:40 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:08:53 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:18:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

On 6/27/13 8:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:56:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War ? SCOTUS strikes down
DOMA
Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard

The DOMA decision is not the one that will start the civil war.
SCOTUS
punting on Perry threw the question of state marriage laws back
to the
states.
You can still have a couple married in California, considered
unmarried across the line in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon.

Yes, but their rights follow them.


Well, the jury is out on that one, but it appears that if a gay
couple
from California moves to Backwardsville, Texas (that would be
the entire
state), the state of Texas does not have to recognize that marriage.
What is going to happen is that there will be many lawsuits filed
in the
states that don't recognize gay marriage, and eventually those
barriers
will come down.

That may be true in the 9th circuit but it may not go the same way in
the 11th and the court did not give them any specific guidance.

Why wouldn't my Texas issued CCW permit be honored in California?

I dunno. The same reason it is not honored in:

Connecticut, District of Columbia, Guam, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, New York
City, Ohio, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Virgin Islands,
Washington, American Samoa, Illinois, N. Mariana Islands?

If a marriage "can" be force to be recognized by other states then
surely a CCW permit is
just the same.

I agree.


There is no federal law that requires one state to recognize marriages
performed in another state. What the Supremes did was rule DOMA was
unConstitutional. DOMA stipulated that certain federal financial perks
and other similar benefits accrued to only male-female married couples.

-------------------------------------

Unless the states eventually stop worrying about where you were married
(like they do for heterosexual couples) the gay rights groups will soon
be pressing for a federal law that forces recognition of gay marriages
uniformly throughout the country.

If that happens, then I want to be able to travel anywhere in the
country carrying a firearm. Fair is fair. :-)







I don't see the feds getting into the marriage business on its own
through Congressional action, and I don't believe the Constitutional
amendment process would fly until several more generations have passed.

It would be smarter for the individual states to just move on to another
issue of great importance to Republican lawmakers, such as regulating
the loves of the women in their states. Oh, wait...they already do that.

On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 09:25:11 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article om,
says...

On 6/28/2013 8:08 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:18:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 6/27/13 8:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:56:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War ? SCOTUS strikes down DOMA
Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard

The DOMA decision is not the one that will start the civil war. SCOTUS
punting on Perry threw the question of state marriage laws back to the
states.
You can still have a couple married in California, considered
unmarried across the line in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon.

Yes, but their rights follow them.


Well, the jury is out on that one, but it appears that if a gay couple
from California moves to Backwardsville, Texas (that would be the entire
state), the state of Texas does not have to recognize that marriage.
What is going to happen is that there will be many lawsuits filed in the
states that don't recognize gay marriage, and eventually those barriers
will come down.

That may be true in the 9th circuit but it may not go the same way in
the 11th and the court did not give them any specific guidance.

Why wouldn't my Texas issued CCW permit be honored in California?


Because it isn't.

If a gaw marriage can be honored across state lines and a drivers license why isn't a CCW
permit.

LMAO!!

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!