| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ... On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 3:59:05 PM UTC-4, Eisboch wrote: "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Wed, 8 May 2013 09:12:30 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 7 May 2013 14:49:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: How did Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was? ==== He didn't need to know. Anyone walking aimlessly through a neighborhood and looking into cars is immediately suspect. That is usually criminal behavior and it's easy to spot. So, everyone should shoot and kill anybody walking (NOT aimlessly) through a neighborhood turning his head toward cars (allegedly). Got it. === That's nonsense of course but you seem to have your mind made up already, so what's the point of discussing it? Most importantly, the courts will ultimately decide regardless of our opinions. That's what happened! ------------------------------------------------------- If you are an eye witness to this I'd suggest you immediately contact the attorneys involved and offer your testimony. If you are not an eye witness, then your assumptions are pure speculation. As are yours. ----------------------------------- Mine? I haven't offered an opinion or assumption one way or the other. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Wed, 8 May 2013 09:12:30 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 7 May 2013 14:49:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: How did Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was? ==== He didn't need to know. Anyone walking aimlessly through a neighborhood and looking into cars is immediately suspect. That is usually criminal behavior and it's easy to spot. So, everyone should shoot and kill anybody walking (NOT aimlessly) through a neighborhood turning his head toward cars (allegedly). Got it. === That's nonsense of course but you seem to have your mind made up already, so what's the point of discussing it? Most importantly, the courts will ultimately decide regardless of our opinions. That's what happened! ------------------------------------------------------- If you are an eye witness to this I'd suggest you immediately contact the attorneys involved and offer your testimony. If you are not an eye witness, then your assumptions are pure speculation. That's my point exactly! I'm no more a witness to it than Greg, BAR or FOX news! |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , says...
In article , says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Wed, 8 May 2013 09:12:30 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 7 May 2013 14:49:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: How did Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was? ==== He didn't need to know. Anyone walking aimlessly through a neighborhood and looking into cars is immediately suspect. That is usually criminal behavior and it's easy to spot. So, everyone should shoot and kill anybody walking (NOT aimlessly) through a neighborhood turning his head toward cars (allegedly). Got it. === That's nonsense of course but you seem to have your mind made up already, so what's the point of discussing it? Most importantly, the courts will ultimately decide regardless of our opinions. That's what happened! ------------------------------------------------------- If you are an eye witness to this I'd suggest you immediately contact the attorneys involved and offer your testimony. If you are not an eye witness, then your assumptions are pure speculation. That's my point exactly! I'm no more a witness to it than Greg, BAR or FOX news! I never said I was an eye witness. I have only repeated what has been reported by the police and media outlets. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 5/8/2013 4:30 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2013 16:13:27 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... If you are an eye witness to this I'd suggest you immediately contact the attorneys involved and offer your testimony. If you are not an eye witness, then your assumptions are pure speculation. That's my point exactly! I'm no more a witness to it than Greg, BAR or FOX news! I am giving the defendant the benefit of the doubt and putting the burden of proof on the state, as it should be. You and Harry are the ones who have convinced yourselves that this was premeditated murder with no evidence to back it up. I call "bull****"... There is no way you believe that's the way they feel "just because they said it here"... They are just trolling you and will say whatever it takes to do that regardless of how they feel.. LOL! So Greg, on *you* I call bull**** LOL! |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
says... On 5/8/2013 4:30 PM, wrote: On Wed, 8 May 2013 16:13:27 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... If you are an eye witness to this I'd suggest you immediately contact the attorneys involved and offer your testimony. If you are not an eye witness, then your assumptions are pure speculation. That's my point exactly! I'm no more a witness to it than Greg, BAR or FOX news! I am giving the defendant the benefit of the doubt and putting the burden of proof on the state, as it should be. You and Harry are the ones who have convinced yourselves that this was premeditated murder with no evidence to back it up. I call "bull****"... There is no way you believe that's the way they feel "just because they said it here"... They are just trolling you and will say whatever it takes to do that regardless of how they feel.. LOL! So Greg, on *you* I call bull**** LOL!http://tinyurl.com/834nzb7 |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
says... On Wed, 8 May 2013 16:13:27 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... If you are an eye witness to this I'd suggest you immediately contact the attorneys involved and offer your testimony. If you are not an eye witness, then your assumptions are pure speculation. That's my point exactly! I'm no more a witness to it than Greg, BAR or FOX news! I am giving the defendant the benefit of the doubt and putting the burden of proof on the state, as it should be. You and Harry are the ones who have convinced yourselves that this was premeditated murder with no evidence to back it up. Corey is not even saying that. The thrust of her indictment was that Zimmerman had a depraved mind when he followed Martin but there is no real proof of that either. He had about 50 other incidents with similar circumstances with no violence involved at all. This would have been a non-issue if Martin had simply answered the question "What are you doing here" with something along the lines of "I am staying over there" but the indications from everything we know or have heard is that he answered that question with a punch in the face. If you know anything else, please tell us http://tinyurl.com/834nzb7 |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Zimmerman a molester | General | |||
| I could have Zimmerman'd it... | General | |||
| For those who think Zimmerman didn't persue Martin | General | |||
| So why did Zimmerman...... | General | |||