| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article ,
says... In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On Sun, 5 May 2013 10:41:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? ========= OJ Simpson's lead attorney, Johnnie Cochran, once said that no jury has ever convicted an innocent man. Pushing that reasoning just a tad farther, I would posit that no innocent man has ever been shot. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/5/2013 11:21 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sun, 5 May 2013 10:41:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? ========= OJ Simpson's lead attorney, Johnnie Cochran, once said that no jury has ever convicted an innocent man. Pushing that reasoning just a tad farther, I would posit that no innocent man has ever been shot. With all due respect.. that's nuts... |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
|
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article , says...
In article , says... In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/7/13 10:24 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? Everyone knows only black guys shack up with chicks. White guys shack up with their guns and other guys.  |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/7/2013 11:17 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/7/13 10:24 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? Everyone knows only black guys shack up with chicks. White guys shack up with their guns and other guys. Black guys love white chicks who are married to older gentlemen who can't perform anymore. ;-) |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On Tue, 07 May 2013 11:17:43 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 5/7/13 10:24 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article om, says... On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a gun. You are certainly making a lot of **** up here. Such as? He was a vigilante! He was watching a suspicious person Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy. His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? Everyone knows only black guys shack up with chicks. White guys shack up with their guns and other guys. I thought gay was good! Here you go making disparaging comments about same again. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Zimmerman a molester | General | |||
| I could have Zimmerman'd it... | General | |||
| For those who think Zimmerman didn't persue Martin | General | |||
| So why did Zimmerman...... | General | |||
![BAR[_2_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
