In article ,
says...

On Wed, 01 May 2013 06:13:13 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/1/13 12:47 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:38:43 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yw9tj7

I think he is getting bad legal advice but it may be that O'Mara knows
the process is so compromised by politics that he could not get a fair
immunity hearing.
People with far worse cases have prevailed in that hearing.



Well, of course. Shoot away, and then claim stand your ground.

There was the beating he took before he pulled his gun.

You have NO evidence of that.

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 01 May 2013 06:13:13 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/1/13 12:47 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:38:43 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yw9tj7

I think he is getting bad legal advice but it may be that O'Mara knows
the process is so compromised by politics that he could not get a fair
immunity hearing.
People with far worse cases have prevailed in that hearing.



Well, of course. Shoot away, and then claim stand your ground.

There was the beating he took before he pulled his gun.

You have NO evidence of that.

You must have missed seeing the police photos that show Zimmerman took a beating at the hands
of the 17 year old thug in training Travon Martin. The real question is why they always use a
picture of Travon when he was 13 rather than one when he was 17.

On Wed, 1 May 2013 19:40:47 -0400, BAR wrote:

The real question is why they always use a
picture of Travon when he was 13 rather than one when he was 17.

===

More biased reporting from the anti gun/anti self defense weenies.

On 5/1/13 8:00 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2013 19:40:47 -0400, BAR wrote:

The real question is why they always use a
picture of Travon when he was 13 rather than one when he was 17.

===

More biased reporting from the anti gun/anti self defense weenies.


There have been plenty of photos posted of the murdered teen when he was
older than 13 or 14. There also have been photos posted, purportedly of
Martin at 17, but many of these were not of *the* Martin.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 1 May 2013 12:11:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...


Well, of course. Shoot away, and then claim stand your ground.

There was the beating he took before he pulled his gun.

You have NO evidence of that.

I guess the POLICE faked those photos.

You and everyone can tell from photos that there was a "beating before
he pulled his gun" how?

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 1 May 2013 17:09:18 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 1 May 2013 12:11:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...


Well, of course. Shoot away, and then claim stand your ground.

There was the beating he took before he pulled his gun.

You have NO evidence of that.

I guess the POLICE faked those photos.

You and everyone can tell from photos that there was a "beating before
he pulled his gun" how?

Because Travonn wasn't shot before he could attack Zimmernan.

Oh, because he wasn't shot means that Zimmerman didn't have his gun in
his head, huh? Bull****.

Nobody tolerates that kind of a beating if they have a gun in their
hand

But you said above that he didn't have a gun in his hand until after the
beating!!!!!