On 5/7/13 10:24 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article om,
says...

On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,


No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a
gun.

You are certainly making a lot of **** up here.

Such as? He was a vigilante!

He was watching a suspicious person

Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the
subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy.


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.

I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?

Just another piece of information.

Relevant how?


Everyone knows only black guys shack up with chicks. White guys shack up
with their guns and other guys.

On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was

shacking up with some chick.

I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?

Just another piece of information.

Relevant how?

In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how.

In article , says...

On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was

shacking up with some chick.

I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?

Just another piece of information.

Relevant how?

In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how.

Bingo! I know who the little ******* hoodlums in my neighborhood are.

On 5/7/2013 11:17 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/7/13 10:24 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,

says...

In article om,

says...

On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,


No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because
he had a
gun.

You are certainly making a lot of **** up here.

Such as? He was a vigilante!

He was watching a suspicious person

Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house
in the
subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy.


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property.
Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.

I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?

Just another piece of information.

Relevant how?


Everyone knows only black guys shack up with chicks. White guys shack up
with their guns and other guys.
Black guys love white chicks who are married to older gentlemen who
can't perform anymore. ;-)

In article ,
says...

On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was

shacking up with some chick.

I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?

Just another piece of information.

Relevant how?

In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how.

So he should die, eh?

On 5/7/2013 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was

shacking up with some chick.

I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?

Just another piece of information.

Relevant how?

In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how.


Was it profiling or common sense that drew Zimms attention to the young
fella peering into car windows.

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was

shacking up with some chick.

I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?

Just another piece of information.

Relevant how?

In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how.

Bingo! I know who the little ******* hoodlums in my neighborhood are.

So you're going to kill them? And what about a stranger in your
neighborhood, how would you know that HE was a "hoodlum"? An awful lot
has been said right here in rec.boats that the kid had a "past". How did
Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was?

In article om, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

On 5/7/2013 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was

shacking up with some chick.

I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?

Just another piece of information.

Relevant how?

In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how.


Was it profiling or common sense that drew Zimms attention to the young
fella peering into car windows.

Common bigotry. It's the right wing way!

On 5/7/13 2:49 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

In article , says...

On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was

shacking up with some chick.

I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?

Just another piece of information.

Relevant how?

In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how.

Bingo! I know who the little ******* hoodlums in my neighborhood are.

So you're going to kill them? And what about a stranger in your
neighborhood, how would you know that HE was a "hoodlum"? An awful lot
has been said right here in rec.boats that the kid had a "past". How did
Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was?



Zimmerman was the one with the past, with several incompletely
prosecuted incidents of violence, including one against a woman.

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was

shacking up with some chick.

I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?

Just another piece of information.

Relevant how?

In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how.

So he should die, eh?

He died as a result of an altercation with an armed citizen. Martin thought he was going to
beat down some guy and he ended up dying for his efforts.