BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/156942-those-here-following-zimmerman-martin-murder.html)

iBoaterer[_3_] May 5th 13 03:41 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

In article om,

says...

On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/2/13 12:30 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,


No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a
gun.

You are certainly making a lot of **** up here.

Such as? He was a vigilante!

He was watching a suspicious person

Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the
subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy.


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.


Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.


I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?

Wayne B May 5th 13 04:21 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On Sun, 5 May 2013 10:41:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.


I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?


=========

OJ Simpson's lead attorney, Johnnie Cochran, once said that no jury
has ever convicted an innocent man. Pushing that reasoning just a
tad farther, I would posit that no innocent man has ever been shot.

JustWaitAFrekinMinute May 5th 13 05:02 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/5/2013 11:21 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sun, 5 May 2013 10:41:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.


I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?


=========

OJ Simpson's lead attorney, Johnnie Cochran, once said that no jury
has ever convicted an innocent man. Pushing that reasoning just a
tad farther, I would posit that no innocent man has ever been shot.


With all due respect.. that's nuts...

Hank©[_2_] May 5th 13 05:46 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/5/2013 9:29 AM, BAR wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/2/13 12:30 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,


No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a
gun.

You are certainly making a lot of **** up here.

Such as? He was a vigilante!

He was watching a suspicious person

Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the
subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy.


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.


Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.


It's too bad that Trevon didn't know O'Bama was so fond of him. He might
have sought refuge at the White House instead of the love nest.

iBoaterer[_3_] May 5th 13 07:28 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

On Sun, 5 May 2013 10:41:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.


I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?


=========

OJ Simpson's lead attorney, Johnnie Cochran, once said that no jury
has ever convicted an innocent man. Pushing that reasoning just a
tad farther, I would posit that no innocent man has ever been shot.


And that is just plain silly.

iBoaterer[_3_] May 6th 13 01:35 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article m, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

On 5/5/2013 9:29 AM, BAR wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/2/13 12:30 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,


No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a
gun.

You are certainly making a lot of **** up here.

Such as? He was a vigilante!

He was watching a suspicious person

Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the
subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy.


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.


Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.


It's too bad that Trevon didn't know O'Bama was so fond of him. He might
have sought refuge at the White House instead of the love nest.


And that's equally stupid.

F.O.A.D. May 6th 13 01:39 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/6/13 8:35 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

On 5/5/2013 9:29 AM, BAR wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/2/13 12:30 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,


No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a
gun.

You are certainly making a lot of **** up here.

Such as? He was a vigilante!

He was watching a suspicious person

Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the
subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy.


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.


It's too bad that Trevon didn't know O'Bama was so fond of him. He might
have sought refuge at the White House instead of the love nest.


And that's equally stupid.


"Hank" learned everything he knows scraping paint and swabbing out the
heads on the U.S.S. NeverLeavesPort.

Hank©[_2_] May 6th 13 04:56 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
On 5/6/2013 8:39 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/6/13 8:35 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

On 5/5/2013 9:29 AM, BAR wrote:
In article om,

says...

On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/2/13 12:30 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,


No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because
he had a
gun.

You are certainly making a lot of **** up here.

Such as? He was a vigilante!

He was watching a suspicious person

Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in
the
subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy.


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property.
Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.


It's too bad that Trevon didn't know O'Bama was so fond of him. He might
have sought refuge at the White House instead of the love nest.


And that's equally stupid.


"Hank" learned everything he knows scraping paint and swabbing out the
heads on the U.S.S. NeverLeavesPort.


Wassamatta? Run out of cleverness?

BAR[_2_] May 7th 13 02:04 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article , says...

In article ,

says...

In article om,

says...

On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/2/13 12:30 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,


No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a
gun.

You are certainly making a lot of **** up here.

Such as? He was a vigilante!

He was watching a suspicious person

Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the
subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy.


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.


Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.


I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?


Just another piece of information.

iBoaterer[_3_] May 7th 13 03:24 PM

For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
 
In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,

says...

In article om,

says...

On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/2/13 12:30 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,


No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a
gun.

You are certainly making a lot of **** up here.

Such as? He was a vigilante!

He was watching a suspicious person

Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the
subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy.


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.


I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?


Just another piece of information.


Relevant how?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com