|
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
In article , says...
In article , says... In article , says... On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how. Bingo! I know who the little ******* hoodlums in my neighborhood are. So you're going to kill them? And what about a stranger in your neighborhood, how would you know that HE was a "hoodlum"? An awful lot has been said right here in rec.boats that the kid had a "past". How did Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was? No, I never said that. I said I know who the little ******* hoodlums are in my neighborhood. If I see little ******* hoodlums in my neighborhood that I don't know I would follow them and make sure that they aren't stealing from me or my neighbors. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On Tue, 7 May 2013 14:49:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
How did Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was? ==== He didn't need to know. Anyone walking aimlessly through a neighborhood and looking into cars is immediately suspect. That is usually criminal behavior and it's easy to spot. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/7/13 6:24 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 7 May 2013 14:49:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: How did Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was? ==== He didn't need to know. Anyone walking aimlessly through a neighborhood and looking into cars is immediately suspect. That is usually criminal behavior and it's easy to spot. There's no evidence the young man was doing anything other than talking on a cell phone and carrying a soft drink and a bag of candy. Zimmerman, on the other hand, has a recorded history of violence. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On Tue, 7 May 2013 14:50:04 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
Was it profiling or common sense that drew Zimms attention to the young fella peering into car windows. Common bigotry. It's the right wing way! ==== I disagree with that. I have called the cops on white kids who were acting in exactly the same way. Suspicious behavior is what it is and totally color blind. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/7/2013 6:28 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/7/13 6:24 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 7 May 2013 14:49:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: How did Zimmerman know about his past, unless Zimmerman knew who he was? ==== He didn't need to know. Anyone walking aimlessly through a neighborhood and looking into cars is immediately suspect. That is usually criminal behavior and it's easy to spot. There's no evidence the young man was doing anything other than talking on a cell phone and carrying a soft drink and a bag of candy. Zimmerman, on the other hand, has a recorded history of violence. And so the kid's "history of violence" is hidden by the law, seems it couldn't hide from lady justice... |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/7/2013 5:06 PM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how. So he should die, eh? He died as a result of an altercation with an armed citizen. Martin thought he was going to beat down some guy and he ended up dying for his efforts. Yup... |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 2:15:18 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 10:24:35 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division. Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was shacking up with some chick. I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty? Just another piece of information. Relevant how? In that he was in a neighborhood where he was not known. He was a stranger in the area, reportedly acting in a suspicious way. That's how. So he should die, eh? Nah, and I never said that. You know that. I just showed you how the aforementioned info (that you questioned) was relevant. There is no doubt it will be explored in court. He died because when he confronted Zimmerman, he attacked him instead of saying "I'm headed down to Miss XX's house, where my dad is shacking up with her, and I'm visiting". That was an unfortunate choice, and ended up costing him his life. Meeting a question with force isn't always the best answer. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On May 8, 12:45*am, wrote:
At this point we should just let the court decide this. That's what I've been saying all along. |
For those here following the Zimmerman-Martin murder...
On 5/8/13 7:45 AM, Tim wrote:
On May 8, 12:45 am, wrote: At this point we should just let the court decide this. That's what I've been saying all along. Might be a more fair trial if it were held in a state not so gun crazy. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com