LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,103
Default Funny Stuff



"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
...

On 5/3/13 4:24 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Fri, 3 May 2013 14:34:21 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

The code says "to provide for a neutral conductor to complete
the
circuit for electronic lighting controls". That is not
necessary
if
you have an incandescent load. Maybe you are just to dumb to
make
the
connection or you are just ****ing with me for some personal
reason
but I am done.

None of the above. Your notion that it's just for CFL's and
LED's
is
bull**** and further, you know it is! As you say, it is "to
provide for
a neutral conductor..." It isn't "necessary" for a CFL any more
than it
is for an incandescent light! Period. And you can't show me
how/where it
is, because it isn't happening.

I have a half dozen 2 wire occupancy sensors working fine on
incandescents without a neutral. None work with a CFL or LED.
Why is that so hard for you to understand?


It's not hard for me to understand, and you are changing yet
again.
YOU
said that the code was changed BECAUSE OF CFL's AND LED's. That is
not
true.


Perhaps because you are in
beyond your depth.


See above. It's you that's in above your head. I've asked and
asked
to
show me where in the code, OR even in code comments it says that
they
went to three wire because of CFL's. You can't because it's not
true.

I suppose I could go to the manufacturer web site and see where
they
verify my result but why bother. You would quibble with their
language
too.


It would have NOTHING to do with code issues as you stated but now
somehow don't.




You two have split the hairs down to atom size. Isn't there
something
more interesting you can argue about with Greg over the course of
5,000
posts?

---------------------------------------------------------

I have no idea who "iBoater" is, but I think he would argue what
shade of black the night sky is indefinitely.


Well, yes because it's not a black and white issue, there would be
several shades, light no light, what type of light, clouds, etc.

--------------------------------------------

Let's just cut to the chase. Black can't have a "shade" because it's
not a color. Black is the absence of color.



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More funny stuff X ` Man[_3_] General 21 August 4th 12 01:41 AM
This is some funny stuff... H the K[_2_] General 0 August 16th 09 09:45 PM
Some funny stuff. [email protected] General 3 February 12th 09 11:16 PM
Funny stuff... hk General 6 September 10th 08 11:38 AM
OT Funny stuff! [email protected] General 8 October 30th 05 08:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017