In article ,
says...

On 4/23/2013 5:29 PM, wrote:


As far as I am concerned, holiday displays celebrate the diversity in
our community and we should accept them all.
That might mean the christians have to tolerate a wiccan display on
halloween tho. Fair is fair.


That's fine... and we won't mock them on Halloween, and they don't mock
us on Christmas. It's not the Christians trying to stop others free
speech, that only seems to go in one direction...

Really?

http://tinyurl.com/ao94hkr

http://tinyurl.com/bcf2ty9

http://tinyurl.com/axkrq9j

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:56:01 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 4/23/2013 5:29 PM, wrote:


As far as I am concerned, holiday displays celebrate the diversity in
our community and we should accept them all.
That might mean the christians have to tolerate a wiccan display on
halloween tho. Fair is fair.


That's fine... and we won't mock them on Halloween, and they don't mock
us on Christmas. It's not the Christians trying to stop others free
speech, that only seems to go in one direction...

Really?

http://tinyurl.com/ao94hkr

http://tinyurl.com/bcf2ty9

http://tinyurl.com/axkrq9j


It is like the boycott of Chik Fil A, Whole Foods and Walmart isn't
it?

I am not sure how effective boycotts are but they are non-violent,
legal ways to protest.

I agree.

On 4/24/2013 12:19 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:56:01 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 4/23/2013 5:29 PM, wrote:


As far as I am concerned, holiday displays celebrate the diversity in
our community and we should accept them all.
That might mean the christians have to tolerate a wiccan display on
halloween tho. Fair is fair.


That's fine... and we won't mock them on Halloween, and they don't mock
us on Christmas. It's not the Christians trying to stop others free
speech, that only seems to go in one direction...

Really?

http://tinyurl.com/ao94hkr

http://tinyurl.com/bcf2ty9

http://tinyurl.com/axkrq9j


It is like the boycott of Chik Fil A, Whole Foods and Walmart isn't
it?

I am not sure how effective boycotts are but they are non-violent,
legal ways to protest.


There is a big difference between mocking and political speech... Was
that kevin posting those apples to our discussion of oranges, sounds
like him?

On 4/24/13 5:26 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/24/2013 12:19 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:56:01 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 4/23/2013 5:29 PM, wrote:


As far as I am concerned, holiday displays celebrate the diversity in
our community and we should accept them all.
That might mean the christians have to tolerate a wiccan display on
halloween tho. Fair is fair.


That's fine... and we won't mock them on Halloween, and they don't mock
us on Christmas. It's not the Christians trying to stop others free
speech, that only seems to go in one direction...

Really?

http://tinyurl.com/ao94hkr

http://tinyurl.com/bcf2ty9

http://tinyurl.com/axkrq9j


It is like the boycott of Chik Fil A, Whole Foods and Walmart isn't
it?

I am not sure how effective boycotts are but they are non-violent,
legal ways to protest.


There is a big difference between mocking and political speech... Was
that kevin posting those apples to our discussion of oranges, sounds
like him?


I love this quote from the second URL:

"Whether you call it a boycott or simply a determination that you are
not going to support companies which are anti-Christ, you do have a
Christian responsibility in this arena. You need to be aware of where
your resources are going and what they are supporting. And you need to
make a positive decision that you are going to support the things that
serve to accomplish the purposes of God."

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Does this include all religions or just Christianity?

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:46:53 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.

=====

There's a big difference between being a so called "progressive" and
having a significant personality disorder.

On 4/24/13 7:53 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:46:53 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.

=====

There's a big difference between being a so called "progressive" and
having a significant personality disorder.


You've been diagnosed, eh?

On 4/24/13 7:46 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.


I haven't any problem with "the religious" doing whatever they do in
their houses of worship and in their homes, and in speaking about it in
public. It only annoys me when "the religious" try to push their beliefs
on the public through legislation or coercion, and who try to use the
public's facilities to further their beliefs. The religious are
destroying the concept of America.

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:14:09 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/24/13 7:46 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.


I haven't any problem with "the religious" doing whatever they do in
their houses of worship and in their homes, and in speaking about it in
public. It only annoys me when "the religious" try to push their beliefs
on the public through legislation or coercion, and who try to use the
public's facilities to further their beliefs. The religious are
destroying the concept of America.

===============

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.