On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:40:07 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/24/13 5:37 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

On 4/24/2013 4:22 PM, wrote:

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:15:00 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,



says...







On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:22:27 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:







No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian, they'll



tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to

do so



means that you will be subjected to a very violent death!







Complete BS. Christians can, and do, question their faith all the

time. The only thing they tell you about being a non-believer

happens *after* your death, it doesn't cause it. Sheesh.







Huh, don't know your bible very well, eh? YOU may be stoned to death!!!



Cite me the last time someone was stoned to death by Christians in the

US. Or anywhere on the globe.



Muslims stoned Christians in Dearborn last year.





You are arguing with kevin/plum/boater/so many others... anyway, he will

say whatever it takes to get you to fight with him, even if it makes no

sense at all. Some kind of mental damage, he enjoys the negative

attention almost as much as our resident asshat... krause.





The christians in this country don't need to stone muslims to death. Our

christians have small arms, artillery, rockets, bombs, and so on and so

forth. Why use stones when you can kill from a distance.

But the military (of which you speak), that is comprised of all manner of religious and non-religious folk, are ultimately commanded by our POTUS. What religion is he, and what are his motives?

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:29:22 PM UTC-4, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 4/24/2013 2:05 PM, wrote:

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:22:27 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:



No, nothing evil about it. It's that to listen to a Christian, they'll

tell you that it's the end all, it's not to be questioned, and to do so

means that you will be subjected to a very violent death!



Complete BS. Christians can, and do, question their faith all the time.. The only thing they tell you about being a non-believer happens *after* your death, it doesn't cause it. Sheesh.





That was kevin you were addressing, he just can't keep up so he makes it

up as he goes along...

Whomever he is, he forgets two important things... that there is no Christian church that actively preaches and condones that scripture he googled from some Christian-hating site, and "Thou shalt not kill". I seem to remember that being one of the ten commandment.

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:46:53 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.

=====

There's a big difference between being a so called "progressive" and
having a significant personality disorder.

On 4/24/13 7:46 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.


I haven't any problem with "the religious" doing whatever they do in
their houses of worship and in their homes, and in speaking about it in
public. It only annoys me when "the religious" try to push their beliefs
on the public through legislation or coercion, and who try to use the
public's facilities to further their beliefs. The religious are
destroying the concept of America.

On 4/24/13 7:53 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:46:53 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.

=====

There's a big difference between being a so called "progressive" and
having a significant personality disorder.


You've been diagnosed, eh?

True North wrote:
I thought Snottie wasn't allowed in the public schools, probably due to behaviour problems, and had to be 'home schooled'.
Why would you think that and what post are you responding to?

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:14:09 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/24/13 7:46 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.


I haven't any problem with "the religious" doing whatever they do in
their houses of worship and in their homes, and in speaking about it in
public. It only annoys me when "the religious" try to push their beliefs
on the public through legislation or coercion, and who try to use the
public's facilities to further their beliefs. The religious are
destroying the concept of America.

===============

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

On 4/24/13 8:26 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:14:09 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/24/13 7:46 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not
from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written
essays edited over the centuries.

===

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.

Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we
all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of
it themselves.


I haven't any problem with "the religious" doing whatever they do in
their houses of worship and in their homes, and in speaking about it in
public. It only annoys me when "the religious" try to push their beliefs
on the public through legislation or coercion, and who try to use the
public's facilities to further their beliefs. The religious are
destroying the concept of America.

===============

It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of
others no matter how much you may disagree with them.


It isn't inappropriate to state clearly what I don't like about "the
religious." I don't give a damn what they do in their houses of worship,
or their homes, or even in their speeches or published papers.

On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 8:14:09 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/24/13 7:46 PM, wrote:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:02:26 -0400, Wayne B

wrote:



On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



The purposes of God? What a giggle. How would they know? Certainly not

from the bible, which is nothing more than a collection of man-written

essays edited over the centuries.



===



It is inappropriate to mock the closely held religious beliefs of

others no matter how much you may disagree with them.



Exactly! I am amazed with these "progressives" who talk about how we

all need more diversity and tolerance but do not demonstrate much of

it themselves.





I haven't any problem with "the religious" doing whatever they do in

their houses of worship and in their homes, and in speaking about it in

public. It only annoys me when "the religious" try to push their beliefs

on the public through legislation or coercion, and who try to use the

public's facilities to further their beliefs.

Funny. That's exactly what *every* special interest group does, but I only seems to bother you when it's Christians. Why is that?