Mark Sanford well positioned to win South Carolina GOP runoff

It’s been nearly two weeks since Mark Sanford placed first in South
Carolina’s 1st district Republican primary and kicked off a runoff
campaign as the heavy favorite to win his party’s nomination.

Little has changed since that time.

With Election Day coming up again on Tuesday, the former governor is the
clear front-runner to defeat former Charleston County councilor Curtis
Bostic.

There haven’t been any “earth-shattering kabooms” during the runoff
campaign, said South Carolina Republican strategist Luke Byars, who is
neutral. He added: “As a result, I think Sanford’s still favored by a
great margin.”

Richard Quinn, a second neutral GOP strategist, said: “My guess is
Sanford will win comfortably.”

Sanford won 37 percent of the vote March 19, while Bostic won just 13
percent, barely good enough to edge out the third-place finisher in the
race. What followed was a fairly quiet and pretty one-sided runoff campaign.

Sanford, who is much better-known and better-funded, has been difficult
to catch. The former governor has stuck to a steady message. He’s
running as a fiscal conservative, pointing to his record on spending as
governor, and before that, as the 1st district representative.

“We’re going to continue working right up to the wire getting our
supporters out to vote and spreading the word about the governor’s
record of cutting spending and debt,” said Sanford spokesman Joel Sawyer.

The Republican fell from grace dramatically in 2009, when, as governor,
he disappeared from the state, then admitted to an extramarital affair.
Voters in the 1st district are very familiar with the matter, and it
hasn’t been a dominant focal point in the Bostic-Sanford back-and-forth.

The issue came up most prominently during a televised debate last week,
only after the moderator raised it. Sanford admitted fault, and argued
that the 2009 episode brought him humility that would serve him well on
Capitol Hill. Without directly mentioning the matter, Bostic called
Sanford a “compromised candidate.”


© The Washington Post Company


Ahh, South Carolina...taking over from Mississippi as the dumbest state.

On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:52:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



Mark Sanford well positioned to win South Carolina GOP runoff
How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

On 4/1/2013 1:05 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:52:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



Mark Sanford well positioned to win South Carolina GOP runoff
How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


I love it when you do that to him. It's the same sort of satisfaction
you get when you swat a fly.

On 4/1/13 1:30 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:52:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Mark Sanford well positioned to win South Carolina GOP runoff

It looks like marital infidelity is not an issue anymore for
politicians ... if it ever really was.

Bunga Bunga


Nor is lying to the voters about where you were and who was paying for it.

On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:33:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 1:30 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:52:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Mark Sanford well positioned to win South Carolina GOP runoff

It looks like marital infidelity is not an issue anymore for
politicians ... if it ever really was.

Bunga Bunga


Nor is lying to the voters about where you were and who was paying for it.

Nor is bull****ting about pistol knowledge.

How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:52:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



Mark Sanford well positioned to win South Carolina GOP runoff
How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?


Salmonbait

How would you treat an alloy different than a polymer, when you think
they are the same thing?

On 4/1/13 1:58 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:52:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



Mark Sanford well positioned to win South Carolina GOP runoff
How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?


Salmonbait

How would you treat an alloy different than a polymer, when you think
they are the same thing?


Herring is busy giving legal advice about blackmail to his son,
psychosnotty.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:33:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 1:30 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:52:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Mark Sanford well positioned to win South Carolina GOP runoff

It looks like marital infidelity is not an issue anymore for
politicians ... if it ever really was.

Bunga Bunga


Nor is lying to the voters about where you were and who was paying for it.

Nor is bull****ting about pistol knowledge.

How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?


Salmonbait

I'd make it out of polymer.....

On 4/1/13 2:41 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:33:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/1/13 1:30 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:52:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Mark Sanford well positioned to win South Carolina GOP runoff

It looks like marital infidelity is not an issue anymore for
politicians ... if it ever really was.

Bunga Bunga


Nor is lying to the voters about where you were and who was paying for it.

Nor is bull****ting about pistol knowledge.

How would you treat a pistol with a safety differently from one without?


Salmonbait

I'd make it out of polymer.....


Or, better still, hybrid steel, polymer and mustard.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:41:43 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:



I'd make it out of polymer.....

Purest here, I like stainless steel.

But, that's an alloy, and according to John, an alloy and a polymer are
one in the same!