LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 968
Default Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 22:42:57 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:11:32 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:56:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/28/13 7:41 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/28/13 4:48 PM,
wrote:

The open question is whether "gay" is a protected class then isn't it?
That is the question Scalia asked the other day.
Are bigamists going to be the next protected class?
Why can't 3 people be married?
At a certain point people may even start questioning the "age of
majority/consent" that is an arbitrary number that is not even uniform
among the states.




Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

Oh, so you think DOMA should supersede state law in Connecticut, DC,
Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York,
Vermont, and Washington?

That passed our congress by a wide margin .
85 to 14 in the Senate, 342 to 67 in the house.
It was signed by your hero

Do you really want that to be our national code?

Fortunately the SCOTUS may strike down DOMA precisely because it does
violate the concept of states rights.

I don't think the government, any government, should be granting or
taking away so called human rights. We all should have the same,
complete rights, including the right to marry whomever we please.


I agree but the same thing happened with interracial marriages. Some
states allowed it some didn't. Eventually, that changed. Change should
be slow if possible.


So we should go slow on gay marriage? I am trying to understand where
you are going with this.


I think that's the way things work at least at the SCOTUS way of
thinking.

I imagine polygamy will be next. If we are truly going to embrace the
GBLT community we can't ignore the "B"s
Bisexuals should be able to have one each shouldn't they?


I have no objection, but just because you "imagine" doesn't make it
likely.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The hypocritical right wingers, or how to be narrow minded iBoaterer[_2_] General 30 March 8th 13 09:54 PM
A good case against being narrow minded. iBoaterer[_2_] General 2 December 27th 12 06:57 AM
Right Wing loses, Left Wing Wins Big H K[_3_] General 0 July 13th 09 12:58 PM
New Narrow boat Maffi General 2 March 9th 06 09:11 PM
OT here go the narrow minded Republcans....again. basskisser General 20 May 7th 04 02:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017