On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:43:19 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:08:48 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 10:55 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:02:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:56 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:51:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:45 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:37:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html



Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



Aren't you on medicare or some variation of it?

Yup, but I paid (and pay) for mine, without a 'tax credit'. That's the big difference, ESAD.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


So, you have no objection to a single-payer system. Good.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait



Is this another in your series of your moronic, oft-repeated mantras?


Did you answer the question?


Salmonbait

You answered your own question. You're for medicare unless it's also
for someone else. Keep the government's fingers off my medicare, right
****forbrains?