Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html

On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:50:53 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html

Apparently the unions are starting to see the light also...

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/unions-grow-wary-health-law-034700539.html?l=1


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

"J Herring" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:50:53 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html

Apparently the unions are starting to see the light also...

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/unions-grow-wary-health-law-034700539.html?l=1


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


-----------------------

What is really going to rile the people is even with a tax credit, people
can not afford the $20,000 premiums the first year. Pay now and in a year
get a tax credit. Pay 80% of your income for insurance?

On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html



Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:37:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html



Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

On 3/22/13 9:45 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:37:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html



Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



Aren't you on medicare or some variation of it?

On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:51:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:45 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:37:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html



Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



Aren't you on medicare or some variation of it?

Yup, but I paid (and pay) for mine, without a 'tax credit'. That's the big difference, ESAD.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

On 3/22/13 9:56 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:51:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 9:45 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:37:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html



Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



Aren't you on medicare or some variation of it?

Yup, but I paid (and pay) for mine, without a 'tax credit'. That's the big difference, ESAD.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


So, you have no objection to a single-payer system. Good.

On 3/22/2013 9:45 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:37:51 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html



Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Isn't the socialist goal 'Medicare for all'?

"you can't see what's in the bill until you pass it".


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

On 3/22/2013 9:37 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html




Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Sorry. No need to pander to unions anymore. The votes have been counted
and he's a lame duck.