In article ,
says...

On 3/22/2013 1:32 PM, Califbill wrote:
"Meyer" wrote in message
eb.com...

On 3/22/2013 9:37 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/22/13 8:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
Looks like they will for many, despite popular claims to the contrary:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324557804578374761054496682.html





Yet another reason to get rid of health insurance companies, who do
nothing but skim money out of the health care delivery system.

Sorry. No need to pander to unions anymore. The votes have been counted
and he's a lame duck.
----------------------

Problem is the unions are government workers. Twice as many union
postal workers as union auto workers.


Unions period... They won't give up anything even when the company is
bled out, look at Twinkies. Saw a story about Detroit I think it was.
The population has literally halved since the 80's but the Unions will
not allow the city to cut back based on the need. Only thing the Union
is thinking of is keeping the 20 bucks a week coming in...

You stupid idiot, do you REALLY think the unions are to blame for
Hostess's demise? What a fool!
\

http://tinyurl.com/be7o7qe

Eisboch was right, you barely make sense and if someeone can glean
anything out of one of your post that does make sense, then you are dead
wrong....