![]() |
Whoops, wrong house.
|
Whoops, wrong house.
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:26:36 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:21:05 -0700, jps wrote: ==== Sorry you didn't like my offer of tea and cookies. At our house we make it a point to leave no doors or windows unlocked at night. Anyone entering has already forced their way in, and in my mind, that is justification enough to open fire. State law agrees with that position. Well then, I'm glad you didn't accidently kill one of your kids for being stupid. === Don't know about your kids but mine are smart enough to not try and force their way into a house. Are all kids just like yours? Kids between 14 and 19 are brain scrambled and likely to make stupid errors in judgement. Should they be subject to death because they've made an error in judgement? While this is an unfortunate turn of events, common sense tells me the shooter was a trigger happy idiot. The kid was unarmed. |
Whoops, wrong house.
On 3/18/2013 10:33 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:28:27 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:23:01 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: an overeager asshole who shot before he could properly assess the situation. You don't know that at all... But do make it up as you go along, just like the Zimmerman case... Or Sharpton/Brawley.. My take away from Zimmerman is even if you are right and the shooting is justified, it still may cost you $300,000 to stay out of jail. My takeaway is that if you're looking for trouble with a gun in your hand, you're likely to find it. Well of course it is... Something happened to you with your guns and not you are an advocate, we get it... |
Whoops, wrong house.
On 3/18/2013 10:39 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:26:36 -0400, Wayne B wrote: While this is an unfortunate turn of events, common sense tells me the shooter was a trigger happy idiot. More of your ideological loogieisms... |
Whoops, wrong house.
On Monday, March 18, 2013 12:09:56 PM UTC-4, jps wrote:
Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends spare time volunteering to help others." The kid wasn't armed, was drunk and a neighbor from two doors down. This is what Merika has come to... At 2:30 a.m., how is a homeowner supposed to know that an intruder is unarmed, and when the intruder is six feet tall, what difference does that make? The kid lived "just two doors down," in a flop house with transient residents the rest of the neighbors wouldn't recognize either. Here's what happens to homeowners who live in liberal paradises where they're not able to own guns for self-defense. http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...l?tid=obinsite When the burglar alarm is ringing, a large male is coming up the stairs, and you're not Chuck Norris, my advice to you is: pull the trigger. Stop blaming America for the actions of irresponsible people -- in this case, the intoxicated teen, his friends, and his parents. |
Whoops, wrong house.
|
Whoops, wrong house.
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:39:01 -0700, jps wrote:
Don't know about your kids but mine are smart enough to not try and force their way into a house. Are all kids just like yours? Kids between 14 and 19 are brain scrambled and likely to make stupid errors in judgement. Should they be subject to death because they've made an error in judgement? ===== Teenagers die because of stupid errors in judgement every day, most often behind the wheel of a car. It's been going on for years. |
Whoops, wrong house.
On 3/19/2013 5:03 AM, jps wrote:
My bet is that the shooter didn't wait to find out intent. Yes, we wouldn't expect anything less of you.. |
Whoops, wrong house.
On 3/19/2013 5:05 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:22:34 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Monday, March 18, 2013 12:09:56 PM UTC-4, jps wrote: Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends spare time volunteering to help others." The kid wasn't armed, was drunk and a neighbor from two doors down. This is what Merika has come to... At 2:30 a.m., how is a homeowner supposed to know that an intruder is unarmed, and when the intruder is six feet tall, what difference does that make? The kid lived "just two doors down," in a flop house with transient residents the rest of the neighbors wouldn't recognize either. Here's what happens to homeowners who live in liberal paradises where they're not able to own guns for self-defense. http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...l?tid=obinsite When the burglar alarm is ringing, a large male is coming up the stairs, and you're not Chuck Norris, my advice to you is: pull the trigger. Stop blaming America for the actions of irresponsible people -- in this case, the intoxicated teen, his friends, and his parents. Merika, where we shoot first and ask questions later. Nobody said that... you are still nothing but a liar. Now tell us why your guns were taken away? Did you have an incident? |
Whoops, wrong house.
|
Whoops, wrong house.
In article ,
says... On 3/18/2013 2:50 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:43:55 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 3/18/2013 2:13 PM, wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote: According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the teen may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed. === Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break. Would you have offered him tea and cookies? In some of these cookie cutter neighborhoods I might almost believe you could walk in the wrong front door but if you are walking around the house looking for a window you can get in, I have to believe it would occur to you at some point that it wasn't your house. I can see it happening to a drunken person... Tough to know what "markers" led the kid to the wrong house or which direction he came from, how he enters his "cookie cutter" window when he's drunk and gets to the right house, the lighting, etc.... Sub development with cookie cutter houses. I happens to people coming home from work who aren't drunk. Well then we need to ban stupidity, as well as booze.. Do you realize how stupid you sound? |
Whoops, wrong house.
On 3/19/13 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 3/18/2013 12:09 PM, jps wrote: Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends spare time volunteering to help others." They better hurry up and ban all alcohol! Idiot. The question is, was he more or less of an idiot before he started watching Fox News. |
Whoops, wrong house.
|
Whoops, wrong house.
|
Whoops, wrong house.
In article ,
says... On 3/18/2013 10:33 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:28:27 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:23:01 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: an overeager asshole who shot before he could properly assess the situation. You don't know that at all... But do make it up as you go along, just like the Zimmerman case... Or Sharpton/Brawley.. My take away from Zimmerman is even if you are right and the shooting is justified, it still may cost you $300,000 to stay out of jail. My takeaway is that if you're looking for trouble with a gun in your hand, you're likely to find it. Well of course it is... Something happened to you with your guns and not you are an advocate, we get it... Could you translate that into English please? |
Whoops, wrong house.
|
Whoops, wrong house.
|
Whoops, wrong house.
|
Whoops, wrong house.
In article ,
says... On 3/19/2013 5:05 AM, jps wrote: On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:22:34 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Monday, March 18, 2013 12:09:56 PM UTC-4, jps wrote: Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends spare time volunteering to help others." The kid wasn't armed, was drunk and a neighbor from two doors down. This is what Merika has come to... At 2:30 a.m., how is a homeowner supposed to know that an intruder is unarmed, and when the intruder is six feet tall, what difference does that make? The kid lived "just two doors down," in a flop house with transient residents the rest of the neighbors wouldn't recognize either. Here's what happens to homeowners who live in liberal paradises where they're not able to own guns for self-defense. http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...l?tid=obinsite When the burglar alarm is ringing, a large male is coming up the stairs, and you're not Chuck Norris, my advice to you is: pull the trigger. Stop blaming America for the actions of irresponsible people -- in this case, the intoxicated teen, his friends, and his parents. Merika, where we shoot first and ask questions later. Nobody said that... you are still nothing but a liar. Now tell us why your guns were taken away? Did you have an incident? Calling others a liar after YOUR track record???? Want me to repost some of yours? |
Whoops, wrong house.
On 3/19/13 8:49 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 3/19/2013 5:05 AM, jps wrote: On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:22:34 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Monday, March 18, 2013 12:09:56 PM UTC-4, jps wrote: Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends spare time volunteering to help others." The kid wasn't armed, was drunk and a neighbor from two doors down. This is what Merika has come to... At 2:30 a.m., how is a homeowner supposed to know that an intruder is unarmed, and when the intruder is six feet tall, what difference does that make? The kid lived "just two doors down," in a flop house with transient residents the rest of the neighbors wouldn't recognize either. Here's what happens to homeowners who live in liberal paradises where they're not able to own guns for self-defense. http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...l?tid=obinsite When the burglar alarm is ringing, a large male is coming up the stairs, and you're not Chuck Norris, my advice to you is: pull the trigger. Stop blaming America for the actions of irresponsible people -- in this case, the intoxicated teen, his friends, and his parents. Merika, where we shoot first and ask questions later. Nobody said that... you are still nothing but a liar. Now tell us why your guns were taken away? Did you have an incident? Calling others a liar after YOUR track record???? Want me to repost some of yours? Are you blackmailing him? :) |
Whoops, wrong house.
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 02:03:55 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:05:51 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:39:01 -0700, jps wrote: Don't know about your kids but mine are smart enough to not try and force their way into a house. Are all kids just like yours? Kids between 14 and 19 are brain scrambled and likely to make stupid errors in judgement. Should they be subject to death because they've made an error in judgement? While this is an unfortunate turn of events, common sense tells me the shooter was a trigger happy idiot. The kid was unarmed. "Unarmed" really doesn't mean much. Over 700 people a year are beaten to death with bare hands, another 500 or so are killed by weapons of opportunity (blunt objects mostly). My bet is that the shooter didn't wait to find out intent. If the first indication of intent was a bullet, then the shooter would have made a big boo-boo. How was the shooter to know the kid didn't have a Glock in his hand? Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. |
Whoops, wrong house.
In article ,
says... On 3/19/13 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 3/18/2013 12:09 PM, jps wrote: Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends spare time volunteering to help others." They better hurry up and ban all alcohol! Idiot. The question is, was he more or less of an idiot before he started watching Fox News. Yes. |
Whoops, wrong house.
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:12:31 -0700, jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:53:52 -0400, Meyer wrote: On 3/18/2013 7:20 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:40:23 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:46:15 -0700, jps wrote: Climbing in a stranger's window in the middle of the night is a pretty dangerous thing to be doing. He might have about 10 seconds to explain himself but it would not take much belligerence to shorten that window. Good answer. In 10 seconds you'd probably find he's drunk and in the wrong house. Fortunately I have a big yellow dog that handles most of that 10 second interchange. That takes me off of the hair trigger status and gives me time to assess the situation. I really do not want to shoot a neighbor's kid, even if he was a burglar but if I felt my family was threatened, bang bang. I assume that JPS has never had to deal with a belligerent drunk. My prior work used to put me in touch with them frequently. And no one said the kid was beligerent. He was doing what 1000 kids did this past weekend after too much to drink, they were trying to sneak into their own houses undetected. Unfortunately this kid wasn't busted by his parents but an overeager asshole who shot before he could properly assess the situation. And now he'll live with the image of having killed someone's child who meant no harm to him. The kid was just trying to go home. Sickening and there are plenty of idiots in this group calloused enough to find justification. This country is ****ing nuts. I do hope you educate your kids about the perils of breaking and entering in the nighttime. No one was breaking and entering. Went through an open window into what he thought was his own house. The guy who shot him looks to be a loon. I understand how you might easily relate to him. Perhaps you should reach out to your fellow loon in his hour of need. The window was open? No screen? The guy didn't have the looks you like? Well ****. No wonder you're ****ed. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. |
Whoops, wrong house.
In article ,
says... On 3/19/13 8:49 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 3/19/2013 5:05 AM, jps wrote: On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:22:34 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Monday, March 18, 2013 12:09:56 PM UTC-4, jps wrote: Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends spare time volunteering to help others." The kid wasn't armed, was drunk and a neighbor from two doors down. This is what Merika has come to... At 2:30 a.m., how is a homeowner supposed to know that an intruder is unarmed, and when the intruder is six feet tall, what difference does that make? The kid lived "just two doors down," in a flop house with transient residents the rest of the neighbors wouldn't recognize either. Here's what happens to homeowners who live in liberal paradises where they're not able to own guns for self-defense. http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...l?tid=obinsite When the burglar alarm is ringing, a large male is coming up the stairs, and you're not Chuck Norris, my advice to you is: pull the trigger. Stop blaming America for the actions of irresponsible people -- in this case, the intoxicated teen, his friends, and his parents. Merika, where we shoot first and ask questions later. Nobody said that... you are still nothing but a liar. Now tell us why your guns were taken away? Did you have an incident? Calling others a liar after YOUR track record???? Want me to repost some of yours? Are you blackmailing him? :) Well, he probably will say so, and tell lies about how he's contacted the proper authorities, all of his friends know, blah blah. |
Whoops, wrong house.
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:57:06 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 3/18/13 9:28 PM, wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:23:01 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: an overeager asshole who shot before he could properly assess the situation. You don't know that at all... But do make it up as you go along, just like the Zimmerman case... Or Sharpton/Brawley.. My take away from Zimmerman is even if you are right and the shooting is justified, it still may cost you $300,000 to stay out of jail. My takeaway is that if you are part of some sort of neighborhood watch, and you aren't supposed to be "watching" with a gun, well, you shouldn't be. My takeaway is that if Zimmerman didn't have his gun handy, he wouldn't have so aggressively pursued the kid and escalated a situation into a homicide. Have you attended the whole trial already? Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. |
Whoops, wrong house.
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 02:05:06 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:22:34 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Monday, March 18, 2013 12:09:56 PM UTC-4, jps wrote: Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends spare time volunteering to help others." The kid wasn't armed, was drunk and a neighbor from two doors down. This is what Merika has come to... At 2:30 a.m., how is a homeowner supposed to know that an intruder is unarmed, and when the intruder is six feet tall, what difference does that make? The kid lived "just two doors down," in a flop house with transient residents the rest of the neighbors wouldn't recognize either. Here's what happens to homeowners who live in liberal paradises where they're not able to own guns for self-defense. http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/...l?tid=obinsite When the burglar alarm is ringing, a large male is coming up the stairs, and you're not Chuck Norris, my advice to you is: pull the trigger. Stop blaming America for the actions of irresponsible people -- in this case, the intoxicated teen, his friends, and his parents. Merika, where we shoot first and ask questions later. You, Donnie, and ESAD - what a threesome. Learn to spell. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. |
Whoops, wrong house.
On 3/19/2013 8:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 3/19/2013 5:03 AM, jps wrote: My bet is that the shooter didn't wait to find out intent. Yes, we wouldn't expect anything less of you.. You forgot to call him the N word, racist. You forgot to mock my girls and their education... kevin... |
Whoops, wrong house.
On 3/19/2013 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 3/18/2013 12:09 PM, jps wrote: Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends spare time volunteering to help others." They better hurry up and ban all alcohol! Idiot. Hey, why don't you spoof my email again and whine like you did the other day.. Noticed that was ok with everybody here... LOL! |
Whoops, wrong house.
In article ,
says... On 3/19/2013 8:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 3/19/2013 5:03 AM, jps wrote: My bet is that the shooter didn't wait to find out intent. Yes, we wouldn't expect anything less of you.. You forgot to call him the N word, racist. You forgot to mock my girls and their education... kevin... I'm not kevin, dip****, BUT, I've never mocked your girls or their education, you liar. What I HAVE done is mock your LIES about your girls and their education. If you think otherwise, please show the group, liar. |
Whoops, wrong house.
In article ,
says... On 3/19/2013 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 3/18/2013 12:09 PM, jps wrote: Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends spare time volunteering to help others." They better hurry up and ban all alcohol! Idiot. Hey, why don't you spoof my email again and whine like you did the other day.. Noticed that was ok with everybody here... LOL! What on earth are you babbling insanely about NOW? |
Whoops, wrong house.
On 3/19/2013 10:24 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 3/19/2013 8:48 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 3/19/2013 5:03 AM, jps wrote: My bet is that the shooter didn't wait to find out intent. Yes, we wouldn't expect anything less of you.. You forgot to call him the N word, racist. You forgot to mock my girls and their education... kevin... I'm not kevin, dip****, BUT, I've never mocked your girls or their education, you liar. What I HAVE done is mock your LIES about your girls and their education. If you think otherwise, please show the group, liar. It is what it is kevin, you are pathetic... |
Whoops, wrong house.
On 3/19/2013 10:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 3/19/2013 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 3/18/2013 12:09 PM, jps wrote: Looks like this drunk teen tried to get in a house just two doors from his own. His reward? Shot to death by "a helper, someone who spends spare time volunteering to help others." They better hurry up and ban all alcohol! Idiot. Hey, why don't you spoof my email again and whine like you did the other day.. Noticed that was ok with everybody here... LOL! What on earth are you babbling insanely about NOW? The other day when you spoofed my justwait email and posted a long whiney post here that harry, you and donnie played with for a half a day? It's ok though, at least you didn't use a bad word:) |
Whoops, wrong house.
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:21:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote
"jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote: According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the teen may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed. === Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break. Would you have offered him tea and cookies? Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10 seconds to explain himself and found that you'd just shot your neighbor's kid who was too drunk to know the difference between houses. You want to carry that kind of weight around for the rest of your life, like your compatriots here? Ya'll put up a brave face but I have to wonder how many nights you'd sit awake wondering how that kid's father and mother feel. The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt. ------------------------------------- Castle laws may give you legal authority but I'd have to be more convinced that the intruder was an immediate threat to me or my wife before I'd open fire. Shooting someone is pretty serious stuff. Depending on his motives, you might not have much time to make up your mind. But according to harry, it's a no brainer. |
Whoops, wrong house.
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:02:01 -0400, Meyer wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:21:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote: According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the teen may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed. === Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break. Would you have offered him tea and cookies? Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10 seconds to explain himself and found that you'd just shot your neighbor's kid who was too drunk to know the difference between houses. You want to carry that kind of weight around for the rest of your life, like your compatriots here? Ya'll put up a brave face but I have to wonder how many nights you'd sit awake wondering how that kid's father and mother feel. The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt. ------------------------------------- Castle laws may give you legal authority but I'd have to be more convinced that the intruder was an immediate threat to me or my wife before I'd open fire. Shooting someone is pretty serious stuff. Depending on his motives, you might not have much time to make up your mind. But according to harry, it's a no brainer. And, a warning shot was fired. I hope the ceiling didn't suffer too much. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. |
Whoops, wrong house.
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:49:44 -0700, jps wrote
The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt. Amazing. You atheists are so predictable. |
Whoops, wrong house.
On 3/19/2013 11:02 AM, Meyer wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:21:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote: According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the teen may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed. === Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break. Would you have offered him tea and cookies? Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10 seconds to explain himself and found that you'd just shot your neighbor's kid who was too drunk to know the difference between houses. You want to carry that kind of weight around for the rest of your life, like your compatriots here? Ya'll put up a brave face but I have to wonder how many nights you'd sit awake wondering how that kid's father and mother feel. The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt. ------------------------------------- Castle laws may give you legal authority but I'd have to be more convinced that the intruder was an immediate threat to me or my wife before I'd open fire. Shooting someone is pretty serious stuff. Depending on his motives, you might not have much time to make up your mind. But according to harry, it's a no brainer. According to everything harry has said over the years, the kid would have been dead at his home too... |
Whoops, wrong house.
On 3/19/13 11:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/19/2013 11:02 AM, Meyer wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:21:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote: According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the teen may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed. === Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break. Would you have offered him tea and cookies? Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10 seconds to explain himself and found that you'd just shot your neighbor's kid who was too drunk to know the difference between houses. You want to carry that kind of weight around for the rest of your life, like your compatriots here? Ya'll put up a brave face but I have to wonder how many nights you'd sit awake wondering how that kid's father and mother feel. The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt. ------------------------------------- Castle laws may give you legal authority but I'd have to be more convinced that the intruder was an immediate threat to me or my wife before I'd open fire. Shooting someone is pretty serious stuff. Depending on his motives, you might not have much time to make up your mind. But according to harry, it's a no brainer. According to everything harry has said over the years, the kid would have been dead at his home too... I don't shoot in the dark, d.f. If an obviously drunk kid broke in and he wasn't wielding any sort of weapon, I'd simply get him down on the floor and call the police. Now, if the intruder were a short little greasy **** adult male who broke in and he looked like you, I'd assume it was a home invasion and act accordingly. |
Whoops, wrong house.
On 3/19/2013 11:19 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/19/13 11:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 3/19/2013 11:02 AM, Meyer wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:21:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:32:45 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:09:56 -0700, jps wrote: According to the Post, law enforcement sources believed that the teen may have entered the home through a rear window and was not armed. === Entering someone else's through a rear window? Give me a break. Would you have offered him tea and cookies? Imagine what a schmuck you'd feel like if you didn't give the kid 10 seconds to explain himself and found that you'd just shot your neighbor's kid who was too drunk to know the difference between houses. You want to carry that kind of weight around for the rest of your life, like your compatriots here? Ya'll put up a brave face but I have to wonder how many nights you'd sit awake wondering how that kid's father and mother feel. The callous responses here are astounding. Christians, no doubt. ------------------------------------- Castle laws may give you legal authority but I'd have to be more convinced that the intruder was an immediate threat to me or my wife before I'd open fire. Shooting someone is pretty serious stuff. Depending on his motives, you might not have much time to make up your mind. But according to harry, it's a no brainer. According to everything harry has said over the years, the kid would have been dead at his home too... I don't shoot in the dark, d.f. If an obviously drunk kid broke in and he wasn't wielding any sort of weapon, I'd simply get him down on the floor and call the police. Now, if the intruder were a short little greasy **** adult male who broke in and he looked like you, I'd assume it was a home invasion and act accordingly. Yeah, right.... |
Whoops, wrong house.
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:32:42 -0700, jps wrote
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:52:41 -0400, Meyer wrote: On 3/18/2013 9:12 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:53:52 -0400, Meyer wrote: On 3/18/2013 7:20 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:40:23 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:46:15 -0700, jps wrote: Climbing in a stranger's window in the middle of the night is a pretty dangerous thing to be doing. He might have about 10 seconds to explain himself but it would not take much belligerence to shorten that window. Good answer. In 10 seconds you'd probably find he's drunk and in the wrong house. Fortunately I have a big yellow dog that handles most of that 10 second interchange. That takes me off of the hair trigger status and gives me time to assess the situation. I really do not want to shoot a neighbor's kid, even if he was a burglar but if I felt my family was threatened, bang bang. I assume that JPS has never had to deal with a belligerent drunk. My prior work used to put me in touch with them frequently. And no one said the kid was beligerent. He was doing what 1000 kids did this past weekend after too much to drink, they were trying to sneak into their own houses undetected. Unfortunately this kid wasn't busted by his parents but an overeager asshole who shot before he could properly assess the situation. And now he'll live with the image of having killed someone's child who meant no harm to him. The kid was just trying to go home. Sickening and there are plenty of idiots in this group calloused enough to find justification. This country is ****ing nuts. I do hope you educate your kids about the perils of breaking and entering in the nighttime. No one was breaking and entering. Went through an open window into what he thought was his own house. The guy who shot him looks to be a loon. I understand how you might easily relate to him. Perhaps you should reach out to your fellow loon in his hour of need. Sorry, I don't probe the sordid details of these incidents of yours. Be sure to educate your children about the perils of leaving windows open at night. Maybe you could get Harry to come over and educate you and the kids about how to deal with things that go bump in the night. You competing for the scummy asshole award with the snot nosed freak? How does that sticks and stones rhyme go? Your juvenile remarks are wasted on me and probably any other poster with good sense. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com