Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 968
Default An article about medical costs

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:48:19 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:39:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:02:08 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

The "medicare underpayments" are still OVER what the actual costs are,
and since medicare CANT negotiate, those costs can't be lower. That
would be a good first fix.

Maybe you are one of those Venus Project people who think we should do
away with money but as long as we have money, you need to pay more
than "cost" just to keep the wheels of commerce turning.
"Cost" for the MRI, still does not pay for keeping the building
running. At a certain point you are cutting the pay and benefits for
the workers who do that.
I agree they over use tests but as long as we have lawyers picking
apart every bad outcome, doctors are going to test everything they
think might insulate them from liability.


So.... You are okay with your insurance being charged $30.00 for a
Tylenol? $25.00 for a blanket which is used and washed to be re-used
over and over and can be bought online for $5.00? You do realize these
VERY excessive costs trickle down to the consumer, right?


I already said, most of that $30 is bureaucratic red tape to avoid
liability.


Just cause you said it doesn't make it a fact. It's bull****. Read the
article.

That blanket is thrown away. I bought one last month and they told me
I could take it home if I wanted.
I agree the prices are inflated. Brill points out several reasons why.


Yet, you just said it was "bureaucratic". So, bull****.

I have already said the Charge Master should be a public record so
people will know what the prices are. They should also publish what
the various negotiated or Medicare capped prices are.


And I said it should be outlawed. What the **** is it for? It's a
funny number designed to rip people off.

There is nothing in this boondoggle that a little sunshine would not
help. The main problem is that the customer is usually totally
ignorant of what the price is that they pay. Most people never get
much farther than "This is not a Bill" on that explanation of benefits
statement.


No that's not the main problem. The main problem is that the customer
has little choice when they show up in the emergency room. You're
going to shop around for a cardiologist while you're have a heart
attack????
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 968
Default An article about medical costs

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:39:52 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:05:35 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:48:19 -0400,
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:39:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:02:08 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

The "medicare underpayments" are still OVER what the actual costs are,
and since medicare CANT negotiate, those costs can't be lower. That
would be a good first fix.

Maybe you are one of those Venus Project people who think we should do
away with money but as long as we have money, you need to pay more
than "cost" just to keep the wheels of commerce turning.
"Cost" for the MRI, still does not pay for keeping the building
running. At a certain point you are cutting the pay and benefits for
the workers who do that.
I agree they over use tests but as long as we have lawyers picking
apart every bad outcome, doctors are going to test everything they
think might insulate them from liability.

So.... You are okay with your insurance being charged $30.00 for a
Tylenol? $25.00 for a blanket which is used and washed to be re-used
over and over and can be bought online for $5.00? You do realize these
VERY excessive costs trickle down to the consumer, right?

I already said, most of that $30 is bureaucratic red tape to avoid
liability.


Just cause you said it doesn't make it a fact. It's bull****. Read the
article.

That blanket is thrown away. I bought one last month and they told me
I could take it home if I wanted.
I agree the prices are inflated. Brill points out several reasons why.


Yet, you just said it was "bureaucratic". So, bull****.


I know you hate it when I actually have knowledge but my first wife
was a hospital administrator.


And, you didn't address the point. I'd like if you had knowledge. It
doesn't appear so much of the time.


I have already said the Charge Master should be a public record so
people will know what the prices are. They should also publish what
the various negotiated or Medicare capped prices are.


And I said it should be outlawed. What the **** is it for? It's a
funny number designed to rip people off.


It is simply the full retail price they can charge and they make that
a ridiculously high number, like that card on a hotel door. Only a
moron actually pays that much


They can charge anything they want. It has no basis in reality. It's a
made up number. Read the article. You've said hotel room door. What
the **** does that have to do with a do or die price?

There is nothing in this boondoggle that a little sunshine would not
help. The main problem is that the customer is usually totally
ignorant of what the price is that they pay. Most people never get
much farther than "This is not a Bill" on that explanation of benefits
statement.


No that's not the main problem. The main problem is that the customer
has little choice when they show up in the emergency room. You're
going to shop around for a cardiologist while you're have a heart
attack????


If we actually had to pay these bills, it would have never got this
bad in the first place.


What the ****? You're proposing that everyone should pay made up
prices??? What "these" bills? You don't give a **** because you have
insurance and **** everyone else. You're part of the problem, as the
article pointed out.
  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 968
Default An article about medical costs

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:38:53 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:10:42 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:53:47 -0400,
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:28:02 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:39:52 -0400,
wrote:


It is simply the full retail price they can charge and they make that
a ridiculously high number, like that card on a hotel door. Only a
moron actually pays that much

They can charge anything they want. It has no basis in reality. It's a
made up number. Read the article. You've said hotel room door. What
the **** does that have to do with a do or die price?

All prices are a made up number.




Really? So, I guess capitalism is invalid. You know exactly what I'm
talking about.

Cost of buying something for the hospital is say $10. They add
infrastructure of $1. They want to make a profit. So they add $300.
That's completely bull**** right there. Then, they create chargemaster
to legitimize the market up and "negotiate" with people without enough
insurance and drop the cost to $150.

For Medicare, they won't pay more than say $20. Oh what a bummer. The
hospital only made a 200% profit.

Almost forgot: ****


You certainly know **** but the rest of life seems to baffle you.

Where was the allowance in your bookkeeping for non paying patients
that come in the ER?


I know how to **** if that's what you mean. Apparently you're pretty
baffled or maybe you just need a high colonic.

The allowance was accounted for in Brills examination. As I said,
you're pulling this "gotta make a profit" bull**** outta your butt.
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,107
Default An article about medical costs

On 3/14/2013 11:39 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:05:35 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:48:19 -0400,
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:39:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:02:08 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

The "medicare underpayments" are still OVER what the actual costs are,
and since medicare CANT negotiate, those costs can't be lower. That
would be a good first fix.

Maybe you are one of those Venus Project people who think we should do
away with money but as long as we have money, you need to pay more
than "cost" just to keep the wheels of commerce turning.
"Cost" for the MRI, still does not pay for keeping the building
running. At a certain point you are cutting the pay and benefits for
the workers who do that.
I agree they over use tests but as long as we have lawyers picking
apart every bad outcome, doctors are going to test everything they
think might insulate them from liability.

So.... You are okay with your insurance being charged $30.00 for a
Tylenol? $25.00 for a blanket which is used and washed to be re-used
over and over and can be bought online for $5.00? You do realize these
VERY excessive costs trickle down to the consumer, right?

I already said, most of that $30 is bureaucratic red tape to avoid
liability.


Just cause you said it doesn't make it a fact. It's bull****. Read the
article.

That blanket is thrown away. I bought one last month and they told me
I could take it home if I wanted.
I agree the prices are inflated. Brill points out several reasons why.


Yet, you just said it was "bureaucratic". So, bull****.


I know you hate it when I actually have knowledge but my first wife
was a hospital administrator.


I have already said the Charge Master should be a public record so
people will know what the prices are. They should also publish what
the various negotiated or Medicare capped prices are.


And I said it should be outlawed. What the **** is it for? It's a
funny number designed to rip people off.


It is simply the full retail price they can charge and they make that
a ridiculously high number, like that card on a hotel door. Only a
moron actually pays that much

There is nothing in this boondoggle that a little sunshine would not
help. The main problem is that the customer is usually totally
ignorant of what the price is that they pay. Most people never get
much farther than "This is not a Bill" on that explanation of benefits
statement.


No that's not the main problem. The main problem is that the customer
has little choice when they show up in the emergency room. You're
going to shop around for a cardiologist while you're have a heart
attack????


If we actually had to pay these bills, it would have never got this
bad in the first place.


The published price and the insurer cost are quite different. If you buy
goods and services through the hospital they are usually several
multiples of insurer cost.

There are outfits that will arbitrate on your behalf to settle your
hospital bill.
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default An article about medical costs

In article om,
says...

On 3/14/2013 11:39 AM,
wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:05:35 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:48:19 -0400,
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:39:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:02:08 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

The "medicare underpayments" are still OVER what the actual costs are,
and since medicare CANT negotiate, those costs can't be lower. That
would be a good first fix.

Maybe you are one of those Venus Project people who think we should do
away with money but as long as we have money, you need to pay more
than "cost" just to keep the wheels of commerce turning.
"Cost" for the MRI, still does not pay for keeping the building
running. At a certain point you are cutting the pay and benefits for
the workers who do that.
I agree they over use tests but as long as we have lawyers picking
apart every bad outcome, doctors are going to test everything they
think might insulate them from liability.

So.... You are okay with your insurance being charged $30.00 for a
Tylenol? $25.00 for a blanket which is used and washed to be re-used
over and over and can be bought online for $5.00? You do realize these
VERY excessive costs trickle down to the consumer, right?

I already said, most of that $30 is bureaucratic red tape to avoid
liability.

Just cause you said it doesn't make it a fact. It's bull****. Read the
article.

That blanket is thrown away. I bought one last month and they told me
I could take it home if I wanted.
I agree the prices are inflated. Brill points out several reasons why.

Yet, you just said it was "bureaucratic". So, bull****.


I know you hate it when I actually have knowledge but my first wife
was a hospital administrator.


I have already said the Charge Master should be a public record so
people will know what the prices are. They should also publish what
the various negotiated or Medicare capped prices are.

And I said it should be outlawed. What the **** is it for? It's a
funny number designed to rip people off.


It is simply the full retail price they can charge and they make that
a ridiculously high number, like that card on a hotel door. Only a
moron actually pays that much

There is nothing in this boondoggle that a little sunshine would not
help. The main problem is that the customer is usually totally
ignorant of what the price is that they pay. Most people never get
much farther than "This is not a Bill" on that explanation of benefits
statement.

No that's not the main problem. The main problem is that the customer
has little choice when they show up in the emergency room. You're
going to shop around for a cardiologist while you're have a heart
attack????


If we actually had to pay these bills, it would have never got this
bad in the first place.


The published price and the insurer cost are quite different. If you buy
goods and services through the hospital they are usually several
multiples of insurer cost.

There are outfits that will arbitrate on your behalf to settle your
hospital bill.


The prices in the Time article were just what they were, the cost of
doing business with the hospital.
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 968
Default An article about medical costs

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:08:25 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 3/14/2013 11:39 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:05:35 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:48:19 -0400,
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:39:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:02:08 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

The "medicare underpayments" are still OVER what the actual costs are,
and since medicare CANT negotiate, those costs can't be lower. That
would be a good first fix.

Maybe you are one of those Venus Project people who think we should do
away with money but as long as we have money, you need to pay more
than "cost" just to keep the wheels of commerce turning.
"Cost" for the MRI, still does not pay for keeping the building
running. At a certain point you are cutting the pay and benefits for
the workers who do that.
I agree they over use tests but as long as we have lawyers picking
apart every bad outcome, doctors are going to test everything they
think might insulate them from liability.

So.... You are okay with your insurance being charged $30.00 for a
Tylenol? $25.00 for a blanket which is used and washed to be re-used
over and over and can be bought online for $5.00? You do realize these
VERY excessive costs trickle down to the consumer, right?

I already said, most of that $30 is bureaucratic red tape to avoid
liability.

Just cause you said it doesn't make it a fact. It's bull****. Read the
article.

That blanket is thrown away. I bought one last month and they told me
I could take it home if I wanted.
I agree the prices are inflated. Brill points out several reasons why.

Yet, you just said it was "bureaucratic". So, bull****.


I know you hate it when I actually have knowledge but my first wife
was a hospital administrator.


I have already said the Charge Master should be a public record so
people will know what the prices are. They should also publish what
the various negotiated or Medicare capped prices are.

And I said it should be outlawed. What the **** is it for? It's a
funny number designed to rip people off.


It is simply the full retail price they can charge and they make that
a ridiculously high number, like that card on a hotel door. Only a
moron actually pays that much

There is nothing in this boondoggle that a little sunshine would not
help. The main problem is that the customer is usually totally
ignorant of what the price is that they pay. Most people never get
much farther than "This is not a Bill" on that explanation of benefits
statement.

No that's not the main problem. The main problem is that the customer
has little choice when they show up in the emergency room. You're
going to shop around for a cardiologist while you're have a heart
attack????


If we actually had to pay these bills, it would have never got this
bad in the first place.


The published price and the insurer cost are quite different. If you buy
goods and services through the hospital they are usually several
multiples of insurer cost.

There are outfits that will arbitrate on your behalf to settle your
hospital bill.


They don't "settle" your bill, except that they can usually negotiate
on your behalf to get some sort of discount on the made up price of
chargemaster. You're still getting ripped off big time.
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default An article about medical costs

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:39:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:02:08 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

The "medicare underpayments" are still OVER what the actual costs are,
and since medicare CANT negotiate, those costs can't be lower. That
would be a good first fix.

Maybe you are one of those Venus Project people who think we should do
away with money but as long as we have money, you need to pay more
than "cost" just to keep the wheels of commerce turning.
"Cost" for the MRI, still does not pay for keeping the building
running. At a certain point you are cutting the pay and benefits for
the workers who do that.
I agree they over use tests but as long as we have lawyers picking
apart every bad outcome, doctors are going to test everything they
think might insulate them from liability.


So.... You are okay with your insurance being charged $30.00 for a
Tylenol? $25.00 for a blanket which is used and washed to be re-used
over and over and can be bought online for $5.00? You do realize these
VERY excessive costs trickle down to the consumer, right?


I already said, most of that $30 is bureaucratic red tape to avoid
liability.


No, it's not.

That blanket is thrown away. I bought one last month and they told me
I could take it home if I wanted.
I agree the prices are inflated. Brill points out several reasons why.


No, it's not. Yes, you could take it home, but hospital soft goods are
washed and re-used.





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another reason for high medical care costs... John H[_2_] General 0 April 25th 09 08:08 PM
Medical CDs - [Part 1], [Part 2], [Part 3 = MEDLINE 1986-1998] CDs, [Part 4 = Dragon Naturally Speaking CDs, and IBM Via Voice CDs, including Medical Solutions], [Part 5 = Math Solving, and Statistics Porgrams], [Part 6 = Various - Medical Cliparts, [email protected] ASA 1 February 5th 06 03:20 PM
Medical CDs - [Part 1], [Part 2], [Part 3 = MEDLINE 1986-1998] CDs, [Part 4 = Dragon Naturally Speaking CDs, and IBM Via Voice CDs, including Medical Solutions], [Part 5 = Math Solving, and Statistics Porgrams], [Part 6 = Various - Medical Cliparts, [email protected] Tall Ships 0 February 4th 06 09:43 AM
Medical Kits Gary Warner General 15 April 12th 04 10:03 AM
Medical skills Peter Moore ASA 1 June 28th 03 01:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017