Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,027
Default The hypocritical right wingers, or how to be narrow minded

On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 7:19:36 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:54:24 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,


says...




On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:06:51 -0500, wrote:




On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:56:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:




Small town in northern Georgia, the conservatives there are trying to


pass a law that makes household gun ownership mandatory, and this has


already been a conservative made law in a county in Georgia. But, this


got me to thinking, the conservatives are all about LESS LAWS, at least


those laws that they don't like, and here they are telling everyone you


MUST own a gun....






That is old news. Kennesaw Georgia has had that law for 20 years.


There is an exception for anyone who doesn't want to, so it is just


symbolic.




Yeah, but jps' irrational version was much more fun to read.






Salmonbait




Well, stupid, it was me who posted this, not JPS. Also, stupid, this is


about NELSON, GA, not Kennesaw, and Kennesaw is in the COUNTY that I


mentioned as previously enacting this law. BUT, none of this answers my


question as to WHY the right seems to think it's okay for them to


dictate whether or not I have a gun in my house, but they claim to want


less government intrusion in their lives..... purely hypocritical.




OK I was not willing to wait for you to try to find it (it wasn't the

top hit on Google so you didn't really have a chance)



The law includes this language



" Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households

who ... conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of

beliefs or religious doctrine"



I assume you would have a "belief" that would keep you from wanting to

own a gun so you are exempt.

Like I said, you don't have to if you don't want to.

It should also be noted that there is no penalty for breaking this

law.



http://www.nelsongeorgia.com/family-...tion-ordinance


Poor kevin. Proven wrong again.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default The hypocritical right wingers, or how to be narrow minded

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 7:19:36 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:54:24 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,


says...




On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:06:51 -0500,
wrote:



On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:56:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:




Small town in northern Georgia, the conservatives there are trying to


pass a law that makes household gun ownership mandatory, and this has


already been a conservative made law in a county in Georgia. But, this


got me to thinking, the conservatives are all about LESS LAWS, at least


those laws that they don't like, and here they are telling everyone you


MUST own a gun....






That is old news. Kennesaw Georgia has had that law for 20 years.


There is an exception for anyone who doesn't want to, so it is just


symbolic.




Yeah, but jps' irrational version was much more fun to read.






Salmonbait




Well, stupid, it was me who posted this, not JPS. Also, stupid, this is


about NELSON, GA, not Kennesaw, and Kennesaw is in the COUNTY that I


mentioned as previously enacting this law. BUT, none of this answers my


question as to WHY the right seems to think it's okay for them to


dictate whether or not I have a gun in my house, but they claim to want


less government intrusion in their lives..... purely hypocritical.




OK I was not willing to wait for you to try to find it (it wasn't the

top hit on Google so you didn't really have a chance)



The law includes this language



" Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households

who ... conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of

beliefs or religious doctrine"



I assume you would have a "belief" that would keep you from wanting to

own a gun so you are exempt.

Like I said, you don't have to if you don't want to.

It should also be noted that there is no penalty for breaking this

law.



http://www.nelsongeorgia.com/family-...tion-ordinance


Poor kevin. Proven wrong again.


You should learn to read, and research better.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,027
Default The hypocritical right wingers, or how to be narrow minded

On Thursday, March 7, 2013 9:00:39 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 7:19:36 PM UTC-5, wrote:


On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:54:24 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:








In article ,




says...








On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:06:51 -0500,
wrote:







On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:56:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:








Small town in northern Georgia, the conservatives there are trying to




pass a law that makes household gun ownership mandatory, and this has




already been a conservative made law in a county in Georgia. But, this




got me to thinking, the conservatives are all about LESS LAWS, at least




those laws that they don't like, and here they are telling everyone you




MUST own a gun....












That is old news. Kennesaw Georgia has had that law for 20 years.




There is an exception for anyone who doesn't want to, so it is just




symbolic.








Yeah, but jps' irrational version was much more fun to read.












Salmonbait








Well, stupid, it was me who posted this, not JPS. Also, stupid, this is




about NELSON, GA, not Kennesaw, and Kennesaw is in the COUNTY that I




mentioned as previously enacting this law. BUT, none of this answers my




question as to WHY the right seems to think it's okay for them to




dictate whether or not I have a gun in my house, but they claim to want




less government intrusion in their lives..... purely hypocritical.








OK I was not willing to wait for you to try to find it (it wasn't the




top hit on Google so you didn't really have a chance)








The law includes this language








" Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households




who ... conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of




beliefs or religious doctrine"








I assume you would have a "belief" that would keep you from wanting to




own a gun so you are exempt.




Like I said, you don't have to if you don't want to.




It should also be noted that there is no penalty for breaking this




law.








http://www.nelsongeorgia.com/family-...tion-ordinance



Poor kevin. Proven wrong again.




You should learn to read, and research better.


YOU wrote: "WHY the right seems to think it's okay for them to *dictate* whether or not I have a gun in my house..."

But the law you are talking about actually says:

(2) Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.

So, if you lived there, you would not be required (dictated) to posess a gun. I beleive you qualify for an exemption on more than one count.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default The hypocritical right wingers, or how to be narrow minded

In article ,
says...

On Thursday, March 7, 2013 9:00:39 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 7:19:36 PM UTC-5, wrote:


On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:54:24 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:








In article ,




says...








On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:06:51 -0500,
wrote:







On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:56:11 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:








Small town in northern Georgia, the conservatives there are trying to




pass a law that makes household gun ownership mandatory, and this has




already been a conservative made law in a county in Georgia. But, this




got me to thinking, the conservatives are all about LESS LAWS, at least




those laws that they don't like, and here they are telling everyone you




MUST own a gun....












That is old news. Kennesaw Georgia has had that law for 20 years.




There is an exception for anyone who doesn't want to, so it is just




symbolic.








Yeah, but jps' irrational version was much more fun to read.












Salmonbait








Well, stupid, it was me who posted this, not JPS. Also, stupid, this is




about NELSON, GA, not Kennesaw, and Kennesaw is in the COUNTY that I




mentioned as previously enacting this law. BUT, none of this answers my




question as to WHY the right seems to think it's okay for them to




dictate whether or not I have a gun in my house, but they claim to want




less government intrusion in their lives..... purely hypocritical.








OK I was not willing to wait for you to try to find it (it wasn't the




top hit on Google so you didn't really have a chance)








The law includes this language








" Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households




who ... conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of




beliefs or religious doctrine"








I assume you would have a "belief" that would keep you from wanting to




own a gun so you are exempt.




Like I said, you don't have to if you don't want to.




It should also be noted that there is no penalty for breaking this




law.








http://www.nelsongeorgia.com/family-...tion-ordinance



Poor kevin. Proven wrong again.




You should learn to read, and research better.


YOU wrote: "WHY the right seems to think it's okay for them to *dictate* whether or not I have a gun in my house..."

But the law you are talking about actually says:

(2) Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.

So, if you lived there, you would not be required (dictated) to posess a gun. I beleive you qualify for an exemption on more than one count.


Oh, man, THE LAW states that a household must have a gun and ammunition.
I'll ask again, why is it okay for the right to mandate these laws when
the are constantly the ones that claim they don't want the government
interfering with them? It's really a simple question, try answering it.
I don't give a crap about loopholes, I am talking about the principal of
more laws.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A good case against being narrow minded. iBoaterer[_2_] General 2 December 27th 12 05:57 AM
New Narrow boat Maffi General 2 March 9th 06 08:11 PM
Weak Minded Dems Skipper General 44 December 17th 05 08:46 PM
Somple-Minded Beliefs Harry Krause General 20 July 23rd 04 04:09 AM
OT here go the narrow minded Republcans....again. basskisser General 20 May 7th 04 01:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017