|
What guns would be banned:
Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find
it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait -- **Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.** |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/3/13 8:26 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait Not to worry, you'll still be able to have a gun accident with your safetyless, decockerless, striker pistol. |
What guns would be banned:
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:26:43 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote:
Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait -- **Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.** They forgot to include all handguns...whether revolver, semi-auto or whatever. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/3/2013 8:29 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/3/13 8:26 AM, Salmonbait wrote: Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait Not to worry, you'll still be able to have a gun accident with your safetyless, decockerless, striker pistol. Are all your guns equipped with hammers and manual safetys? |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:26:43 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing something". The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they see which of these rules survive the vote. The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun designed to that rule. Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide..... |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/3/13 2:03 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:26:43 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing something". The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they see which of these rules survive the vote. The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun designed to that rule. Frankly, I don't give a **** about Bushmaster rifles or what the NRA wants. As far as I can tell from the last few months of public discussion, the NRA is an outfit of whores whose only real interest is in boosting and protecting the sales of its corporate "partners." |
What guns would be banned:
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 8:41:45 AM UTC-5, Meyer wrote:
On 2/3/2013 8:29 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/3/13 8:26 AM, Salmonbait wrote: Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait Not to worry, you'll still be able to have a gun accident with your safetyless, decockerless, striker pistol. Are all your guns equipped with hammers and manual safetys? His guns came with a vest, cowboy boots and a tin badge. Like this: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://img.costumecraze.com/images/vendors/fashion/740235-Best-in-the-West-Sheriff-Costume-large.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.costumecraze.com/WEST142.html&h=1149&w=600&sz=79&tbnid=UV7r7w99tb4B cM:&tbnh=90&tbnw=47&zoom=1&usg=__0tnTmGCrYVaCxhZIM QUwxiPypss=&docid=vGZIm0sy-PRGOM&sa=X&ei=hrAOUcLTCYba9ATCj4H4Dw&ved=0CGoQ9QEw Ag&dur=70 |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/3/2013 1:47 PM, wrote:
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 8:41:45 AM UTC-5, Meyer wrote: On 2/3/2013 8:29 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/3/13 8:26 AM, Salmonbait wrote: Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait Not to worry, you'll still be able to have a gun accident with your safetyless, decockerless, striker pistol. Are all your guns equipped with hammers and manual safetys? His guns came with a vest, cowboy boots and a tin badge. Like this: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://img.costumecraze.com/images/vendors/fashion/740235-Best-in-the-West-Sheriff-Costume-large.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.costumecraze.com/WEST142.html&h=1149&w=600&sz=79&tbnid=UV7r7w99tb4B cM:&tbnh=90&tbnw=47&zoom=1&usg=__0tnTmGCrYVaCxhZIM QUwxiPypss=&docid=vGZIm0sy-PRGOM&sa=X&ei=hrAOUcLTCYba9ATCj4H4Dw&ved=0CGoQ9QEw Ag&dur=70 Oh man, I had one of those... and I didn't even turn into a gun nut:) |
What guns would be banned:
|
What guns would be banned:
On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud of yourself you are... LOL... |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/3/13 9:02 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible That's pretty much all you do here, little ****. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/3/2013 9:15 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/3/13 9:02 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible That's pretty much all you do here, little ****. Wow, I'm hurt.. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/3/13 9:16 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/3/2013 9:15 PM, ESAD wrote: On 2/3/13 9:02 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible That's pretty much all you do here, little ****. Wow, I'm hurt.. Doubtful your peanut brain works well enough to feel pain. |
What guns would be banned:
On Feb 3, 7:04*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing something". The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they see which of these rules survive the vote. The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun designed to that rule. Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide..... If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line. This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on speeding. ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying weapons in the first place." Is that like allowing illegals to have drivers licenses so they can buy car insurance? |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/3/2013 11:09 PM, Tim wrote:
On Feb 3, 7:04 pm, wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing something". The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they see which of these rules survive the vote. The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun designed to that rule. Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide..... If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line. This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on speeding. ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying weapons in the first place." Is that like allowing illegals to have drivers licenses so they can buy car insurance? It's all about the slippery slope to dems, all a compromise means is we are gonna' reload and come for the rest... |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/3/2013 11:09 PM, Tim wrote:
On Feb 3, 7:04 pm, wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing something". The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they see which of these rules survive the vote. The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun designed to that rule. Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide..... If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line. This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on speeding. ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying weapons in the first place." Is that like allowing illegals to have drivers licenses so they can buy car insurance? I guess they'll have to resort to stealing them instead. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 12:10 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/3/2013 11:09 PM, Tim wrote: On Feb 3, 7:04 pm, wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing something". The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they see which of these rules survive the vote. The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun designed to that rule. Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide..... If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line. This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on speeding. ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying weapons in the first place." Is that like allowing illegals to have drivers licenses so they can buy car insurance? It's all about the slippery slope to dems, all a compromise means is we are gonna' reload and come for the rest... Insurance? No habla engles senor. |
What guns would be banned:
In article 15dacf33-ad36-406e-90ce-
, says... On Feb 3, 7:04*pm, wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing something". The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they see which of these rules survive the vote. The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun designed to that rule. Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide..... If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line. This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on speeding. ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying weapons in the first place." Dick Durbin is an idiot. Is that like allowing illegals to have drivers licenses so they can buy car insurance? |
What guns would be banned:
|
What guns would be banned:
In article 15dacf33-ad36-406e-90ce-
, says... On Feb 3, 7:04*pm, wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing something". The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they see which of these rules survive the vote. The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun designed to that rule. Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide..... If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line. This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on speeding. ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying weapons in the first place." Is that like allowing illegals to have drivers licenses so they can buy car insurance? Cite? |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud of yourself you are... LOL... And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of course, arguing any of the facts presented. |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On 2/3/2013 9:15 PM, ESAD wrote: On 2/3/13 9:02 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible That's pretty much all you do here, little ****. Wow, I'm hurt.. I guess being hurt is easier than arguing any real FACTS about the post, eh? |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/13 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud of yourself you are... LOL... And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of course, arguing any of the facts presented. "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud of yourself you are... LOL... And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of course, arguing any of the facts presented. Why would I argue such nonsense...Am I supposed to address the "Cracker gun nuts"....or point out that "Jerry rigging" is the dems specialty, or "old white men..." It's not a statement or a question, it's more harryisms, just trying to see how far into the insult paragraph folks will read... |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 8:50 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud of yourself you are... LOL... And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of course, arguing any of the facts presented. "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America.... |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
"Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/4/2013 8:50 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud of yourself you are... LOL... And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of course, arguing any of the facts presented. "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America.... Besides, we know harry only jailbroke his phone to streal resources from others, why else do you do it.. LOL! This is the same guy who had hundreds of stolen movies on a computer and has freely admitted that.. Yeah, harry is a crook.. Now go hide some more of those stolen assets harry, boo, the tax man is watching... LOL! |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... |
What guns would be banned:
|
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/13 8:57 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
Besides, we know harry only jailbroke his phone to streal resources from others, why else do you do it.. LOL! This is the same guy who had hundreds of stolen movies on a computer and has freely admitted that.. Yeah, harry is a crook.. Now go hide some more of those stolen assets harry, boo, the tax man is watching... LOL! You're totally out of contact with reality, little turd. I jailbreak my iphone to take advantage of some really neat utility programs available through Cydia and affiliated sources. The apps there are either free, or ask for a donation, or require payment of a reasonable fee. But, of course, you wouldn't understand any of that. Where did you get the idea that the films on my server were not obtained legitimately? You certainly fantasize a lot about the lives of others. I suppose for you, that is better than dealing with the stark reality of your failed life. Is that closet door going to open anytime soon? I'll bet the hinges are creaking, eh? |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On 2/4/2013 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/4/2013 8:50 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud of yourself you are... LOL... And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of course, arguing any of the facts presented. "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America.... Besides, we know harry only jailbroke his phone to streal resources from others, why else do you do it.. LOL! This is the same guy who had hundreds of stolen movies on a computer and has freely admitted that.. Yeah, harry is a crook.. Now go hide some more of those stolen assets harry, boo, the tax man is watching... LOL! Holy ****, you really don't understand do you? Wow, and you try to make people think you're an IT person..... |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On 2/4/2013 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud of yourself you are... LOL... And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of course, arguing any of the facts presented. Why would I argue such nonsense...Am I supposed to address the "Cracker gun nuts"....or point out that "Jerry rigging" is the dems specialty, or "old white men..." It's not a statement or a question, it's more harryisms, just trying to see how far into the insult paragraph folks will read... Idiot. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/13 9:02 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... You're a funny little man. There's nothing "crooked" about jailbreaking a phone. It is perfectly legal. Turn on the light in that little closet of yours, and come out into the sunshine. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 8:57 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: Besides, we know harry only jailbroke his phone to streal resources from others, why else do you do it.. LOL! This is the same guy who had hundreds of stolen movies on a computer and has freely admitted that.. Yeah, harry is a crook.. Now go hide some more of those stolen assets harry, boo, the tax man is watching... LOL! You're totally out of contact with reality, little turd. I jailbreak my iphone to take advantage of some really neat utility programs available through Cydia and affiliated sources. The apps there are either free, or ask for a donation, or require payment of a reasonable fee. But, of course, you wouldn't understand any of that. Where did you get the idea that the films on my server were not obtained legitimately? You certainly fantasize a lot about the lives of others. I suppose for you, that is better than dealing with the stark reality of your failed life. Is that closet door going to open anytime soon? I'll bet the hinges are creaking, eh? Please tell us you are not a crook, Harry. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/13 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... Besides, we know harry only jailbroke his phone to streal resources from others, why else do you do it.. LOL! This is the same guy who had hundreds of stolen movies on a computer and has freely admitted that.. Yeah, harry is a crook.. Now go hide some more of those stolen assets harry, boo, the tax man is watching... LOL! Holy ****, you really don't understand do you? Wow, and you try to make people think you're an IT person..... Actually, Scotty is a dumb **** person, ignorant and incompetent in everything he has ever tried. |
What guns would be banned:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:30:07 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:26:43 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote: Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait -- **Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.** They forgot to include all handguns...whether revolver, semi-auto or whatever. Tell your butt buddy! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! You know you live in a Country run by idiots if... You have to have your parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... So aren't you then. Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed?? |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... So aren't you then. Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed?? Please give specific answers to your accusations: What "drinking problem"? What are you talking about "grills on the porch"? What daughter? What "burned her out of her bed" are you talking about? I'll be waiting. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 9:41 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... So aren't you then. Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed?? Loogie said you "aren't" a crook. Why are you disagreeing with him? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com