|
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 9:07 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 9:02 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... You're a funny little man. There's nothing "crooked" about jailbreaking a phone. It is perfectly legal. Turn on the light in that little closet of yours, and come out into the sunshine. Why did you jail break it? Who's resources or intellectual property are you stealing? |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud of yourself you are... LOL... And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of course, arguing any of the facts presented. Why would I argue such nonsense...Am I supposed to address the "Cracker gun nuts"....or point out that "Jerry rigging" is the dems specialty, or "old white men..." It's not a statement or a question, it's more harryisms, just trying to see how far into the insult paragraph folks will read... Idiot. Yeah, that's as far as I usually get into your posts.. one word till you prove you have nothing to add.. |
What guns would be banned:
On Monday, February 4, 2013 10:23:57 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:30:07 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:26:43 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote: Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait -- **Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.** They forgot to include all handguns...whether revolver, semi-auto or whatever. Tell your butt buddy! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! You know you live in a Country run by idiots if... You have to have your parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion. "butt buddy", Johnny?? Sorry, I don't subscribe to your sexual deviances. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/13 10:28 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/4/2013 9:07 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 9:02 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... You're a funny little man. There's nothing "crooked" about jailbreaking a phone. It is perfectly legal. Turn on the light in that little closet of yours, and come out into the sunshine. Why did you jail break it? Who's resources or intellectual property are you stealing? I haven't jailbroken my iphone 5 yet, because the JB, which reportedly was going to be released yesterday, is now scheduled to be released today. Hopefully. I did JB my iphone 4S, which I no longer own. I ran: Killbackground, which kills all background tasks. iBlacklist, which I paid $12 for, and "blacklists" calls from individuals or organizations I consider annoying, such as repetitive solicitations from telemarketers. SBSettings, which allows me to have toggles for certain functions in a pull down notification center. Infinifolders, which allows me to add an infinite number of app icons to individual folders. That's pretty much it. The iBlacklist and SBsettings were my main JB apps on my 4s. Not a stolen app on the list. Now, when are you coming out of the closet? |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/13 10:31 AM, True North wrote:
On Monday, February 4, 2013 10:23:57 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:30:07 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:26:43 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote: Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait -- **Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.** They forgot to include all handguns...whether revolver, semi-auto or whatever. Tell your butt buddy! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! You know you live in a Country run by idiots if... You have to have your parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion. "butt buddy", Johnny?? Sorry, I don't subscribe to your sexual deviances. It's Herring's latest version of name-calling, the conservatives' answer to their own idiocy. |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On Monday, February 4, 2013 10:23:57 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:30:07 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:26:43 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote: Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait -- **Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.** They forgot to include all handguns...whether revolver, semi-auto or whatever. Tell your butt buddy! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! You know you live in a Country run by idiots if... You have to have your parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion. "butt buddy", Johnny?? Sorry, I don't subscribe to your sexual deviances. Funny how Herring's signature has something about name calling liberals, but it's okay for him to do so.... |
What guns would be banned:
|
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On 2/4/2013 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/4/2013 8:50 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud of yourself you are... LOL... And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of course, arguing any of the facts presented. "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America.... Besides, we know harry only jailbroke his phone to streal resources from others, why else do you do it.. LOL! This is the same guy who had hundreds of stolen movies on a computer and has freely admitted that.. Yeah, harry is a crook.. Now go hide some more of those stolen assets harry, boo, the tax man is watching... LOL! Holy ****, you really don't understand do you? Wow, and you try to make people think you're an IT person..... Yur, funny... But I understand that jailbreak isn't for "stealing" but you are too stupid to understand it.... |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On 2/4/2013 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud of yourself you are... LOL... And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of course, arguing any of the facts presented. Why would I argue such nonsense...Am I supposed to address the "Cracker gun nuts"....or point out that "Jerry rigging" is the dems specialty, or "old white men..." It's not a statement or a question, it's more harryisms, just trying to see how far into the insult paragraph folks will read... Idiot. Yeah, that's as far as I usually get into your posts.. one word till you prove you have nothing to add.. If you didn't get the statement, it's not my fault, moron. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... So aren't you then. Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed?? Please give specific answers to your accusations: What "drinking problem"? What are you talking about "grills on the porch"? What daughter? What "burned her out of her bed" are you talking about? I'll be waiting. You know, the daughter you don't have, then have, then don't have... |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 10:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 2/4/2013 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud of yourself you are... LOL... And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of course, arguing any of the facts presented. Why would I argue such nonsense...Am I supposed to address the "Cracker gun nuts"....or point out that "Jerry rigging" is the dems specialty, or "old white men..." It's not a statement or a question, it's more harryisms, just trying to see how far into the insult paragraph folks will read... Idiot. Yeah, that's as far as I usually get into your posts.. one word till you prove you have nothing to add.. If you didn't get the statement, it's not my fault, moron. No, it's just that I don't take you seriously.. you are a joke, a troll. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/13 10:49 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/4/2013 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... So aren't you then. Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed?? Please give specific answers to your accusations: What "drinking problem"? What are you talking about "grills on the porch"? What daughter? What "burned her out of her bed" are you talking about? I'll be waiting. You know, the daughter you don't have, then have, then don't have... Are you trying to blackmail him, Snotty? |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 10:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Monday, February 4, 2013 10:23:57 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:30:07 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:26:43 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote: Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait -- **Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.** They forgot to include all handguns...whether revolver, semi-auto or whatever. Tell your butt buddy! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! You know you live in a Country run by idiots if... You have to have your parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion. "butt buddy", Johnny?? Sorry, I don't subscribe to your sexual deviances. Funny how Herring's signature has something about name calling liberals, but it's okay for him to do so.... stop your crying... bitch |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 10:51 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 10:49 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/4/2013 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... So aren't you then. Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed?? Please give specific answers to your accusations: What "drinking problem"? What are you talking about "grills on the porch"? What daughter? What "burned her out of her bed" are you talking about? I'll be waiting. You know, the daughter you don't have, then have, then don't have... Are you trying to blackmail him, Snotty? Do you know what blackmail is? |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/13 11:05 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/4/2013 10:51 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 10:49 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/4/2013 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... So aren't you then. Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed?? Please give specific answers to your accusations: What "drinking problem"? What are you talking about "grills on the porch"? What daughter? What "burned her out of her bed" are you talking about? I'll be waiting. You know, the daughter you don't have, then have, then don't have... Are you trying to blackmail him, Snotty? Do you know what blackmail is? Obviously, *you* are the expert in that area, little twerp. :) For the life of me, though, I can't figure why or how you would be the object of "blackmail." |
What guns would be banned:
|
What guns would be banned:
|
What guns would be banned:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:21:13 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote: checking all guns sales through NICS === There are a number of problems with checking all gun sales through NCIS: 1. Over time it becomes comparable to a national gun registration system which is not what the founding fathers intended when they wrote the constitution. 2. Only law abiding citizens who have no intention of abusing their gun rights will comply. For those with criminal intent it will still be business as usual and a thriving black market will come into existence. |
What guns would be banned:
|
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/13 11:40 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:21:13 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: checking all guns sales through NICS === There are a number of problems with checking all gun sales through NCIS: 1. Over time it becomes comparable to a national gun registration system which is not what the founding fathers intended when they wrote the constitution. There's nothing in the Constitution that prevents a national gun registration system. |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On 2/4/2013 10:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Monday, February 4, 2013 10:23:57 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:30:07 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:26:43 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote: Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys Salmonbait -- **Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.** They forgot to include all handguns...whether revolver, semi-auto or whatever. Tell your butt buddy! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! You know you live in a Country run by idiots if... You have to have your parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion. "butt buddy", Johnny?? Sorry, I don't subscribe to your sexual deviances. Funny how Herring's signature has something about name calling liberals, but it's okay for him to do so.... stop your crying... bitch Did you see the first word, moron? "Funny"... meaning laughing at how stupid you and Herring are. |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On 2/4/2013 10:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... ... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in congress. NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established. None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania. Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where Americans are. Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college. Then they'll get thrown out of state power too. Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead species as far as wielding political power. And that's a good thing for everybody else. This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud of yourself you are... LOL... And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of course, arguing any of the facts presented. Why would I argue such nonsense...Am I supposed to address the "Cracker gun nuts"....or point out that "Jerry rigging" is the dems specialty, or "old white men..." It's not a statement or a question, it's more harryisms, just trying to see how far into the insult paragraph folks will read... Idiot. Yeah, that's as far as I usually get into your posts.. one word till you prove you have nothing to add.. If you didn't get the statement, it's not my fault, moron. No, it's just that I don't take you seriously.. you are a joke, a troll. It wasn't MY statement, you idiot!!!!! |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On 2/4/2013 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... So aren't you then. Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed?? Please give specific answers to your accusations: What "drinking problem"? What are you talking about "grills on the porch"? What daughter? What "burned her out of her bed" are you talking about? I'll be waiting. You know, the daughter you don't have, then have, then don't have... Cite? You left the others out. Perhaps it's time to see your slander go away, and you too..... |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On 2/4/13 11:05 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/4/2013 10:51 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 10:49 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/4/2013 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... So aren't you then. Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed?? Please give specific answers to your accusations: What "drinking problem"? What are you talking about "grills on the porch"? What daughter? What "burned her out of her bed" are you talking about? I'll be waiting. You know, the daughter you don't have, then have, then don't have... Are you trying to blackmail him, Snotty? Do you know what blackmail is? Obviously, *you* are the expert in that area, little twerp. :) For the life of me, though, I can't figure why or how you would be the object of "blackmail." Indeed, what does that moron have that someone would want??? |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 11:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 2/4/2013 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... So aren't you then. Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed?? Please give specific answers to your accusations: What "drinking problem"? What are you talking about "grills on the porch"? What daughter? What "burned her out of her bed" are you talking about? I'll be waiting. You know, the daughter you don't have, then have, then don't have... Cite? You left the others out. Perhaps it's time to see your slander go away, and you too..... OH no, threatened by a sock... should you be sending me a nasty letter elsewhere saying "someone told me... """ LOL! |
What guns would be banned:
|
What guns would be banned:
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:44:57 -0500, ESAD wrote:
There's nothing in the Constitution that prevents a national gun registration system. === Why would I want to discuss anything with someone named ESAD? |
What guns would be banned:
|
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/13 1:00 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:21:13 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: checking all guns sales through NICS === There are a number of problems with checking all gun sales through NCIS: That sounds like commie talk to me. Americans overcome problems, not lay down and die. 1. Over time it becomes comparable to a national gun registration system which is not what the founding fathers intended when they wrote the constitution. The Supreme Court decides that. Not you and the other gun nuts. Registration in no way violates "keep and bear arms." Hey....wait. The FF said nothing about keeping guns out of the hands of murderers and psychos either. How dare the NRA stand by and allow that travesty to occur. 2. Only law abiding citizens who have no intention of abusing their gun rights will comply. For those with criminal intent it will still be business as usual and a thriving black market will come into existence. Yeah, like the huge black market in automobiles. Puke out that NRA kool-ade and smarten up. Jesus Christ, since black market means illegal sales, and criminals are illegally buying all the guns they need right now, the "thriving black market" already exists - big time. And NRA and gun nuts refusing tracking of guns are a big part of it. Where on earth do you buy your logic? Indeed, there is NO Constitutional restriction against the registration of firearms. If there is, show it to us. It's not there. There is no problem with requiring that ALL gun sales of any sort be run through NCIS. You should not be able to buy or transfer a firearm to anyone without a background check. If more help is needed at the state and federal level to do this, so be it. The registration fees will cover the governmental costs, and the FFL's charge a fee to handle the paperwork. |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 1:07 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 1:00 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:21:13 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: checking all guns sales through NICS === There are a number of problems with checking all gun sales through NCIS: That sounds like commie talk to me. Americans overcome problems, not lay down and die. 1. Over time it becomes comparable to a national gun registration system which is not what the founding fathers intended when they wrote the constitution. The Supreme Court decides that. Not you and the other gun nuts. Registration in no way violates "keep and bear arms." Hey....wait. The FF said nothing about keeping guns out of the hands of murderers and psychos either. How dare the NRA stand by and allow that travesty to occur. 2. Only law abiding citizens who have no intention of abusing their gun rights will comply. For those with criminal intent it will still be business as usual and a thriving black market will come into existence. Yeah, like the huge black market in automobiles. Puke out that NRA kool-ade and smarten up. Jesus Christ, since black market means illegal sales, and criminals are illegally buying all the guns they need right now, the "thriving black market" already exists - big time. And NRA and gun nuts refusing tracking of guns are a big part of it. Where on earth do you buy your logic? Indeed, there is NO Constitutional restriction against the registration of firearms. If there is, show it to us. It's not there. There is no problem with requiring that ALL gun sales of any sort be run through NCIS. You should not be able to buy or transfer a firearm to anyone without a background check. If more help is needed at the state and federal level to do this, so be it. The registration fees will cover the governmental costs, and the FFL's charge a fee to handle the paperwork. How did you dispose of the bulk of your collection? You had quite the armament at one time. |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On 2/4/2013 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/13 10:28 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/4/2013 9:07 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 9:02 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... You're a funny little man. There's nothing "crooked" about jailbreaking a phone. It is perfectly legal. Turn on the light in that little closet of yours, and come out into the sunshine. Why did you jail break it? Who's resources or intellectual property are you stealing? I haven't jailbroken my iphone 5 yet, because the JB, which reportedly was going to be released yesterday, is now scheduled to be released today. Hopefully. I did JB my iphone 4S, which I no longer own. I ran: Killbackground, which kills all background tasks. iBlacklist, which I paid $12 for, and "blacklists" calls from individuals or organizations I consider annoying, such as repetitive solicitations from telemarketers. SBSettings, which allows me to have toggles for certain functions in a pull down notification center. Infinifolders, which allows me to add an infinite number of app icons to individual folders. That's pretty much it. The iBlacklist and SBsettings were my main JB apps on my 4s. Not a stolen app on the list. Now, when are you coming out of the closet? The IT specialist doesn't realize what Jailbreak does, won't every understand either. Nope, cause I'm not an expert at everything like you, but you are a fraud, so..... Call me what you want, the fact remains, I can learn and retain things, and I don't spout off about crap I know nothing about like you. If you didn't know about it, why did you pipe in then? |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... On 2/4/2013 11:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: "Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal." -Stupid Scotty "****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in his closet. You are a crook, defend that... So aren't you then. Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed?? Please give specific answers to your accusations: What "drinking problem"? What are you talking about "grills on the porch"? What daughter? What "burned her out of her bed" are you talking about? I'll be waiting. You know, the daughter you don't have, then have, then don't have... Cite? You left the others out. Perhaps it's time to see your slander go away, and you too..... OH no, threatened by a sock... should you be sending me a nasty letter elsewhere saying "someone told me... """ LOL! WTF are you babbling about NOW? |
What guns would be banned:
|
What guns would be banned:
|
What guns would be banned:
|
What guns would be banned:
|
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 6:13 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 5:48 PM, wrote: It is an unenforceable law if you are talking about 2 individuals in a private transaction of an unregistered item. That makes it voluntary. It is like trying to make people pay sales taxes if they sell a lawn mower to a neighbor. Is it the law? Usually. Is compliance voluntary? Yes since there is no real way to regulate it.. It will be enforced if it is criminalized at the federal level. He's right.. It will be enforced by our politically and racially motivated "Justice Dept".. snerk |
What guns would be banned:
On 2/4/2013 6:01 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
Ditto with Gander Mountain, WalMart, the military exchanges, most of the internet ammo sites. As these places get them in, the guns are gone in a heartbeat. Psssttt, hey buddy... do you wanna' buy some bullets? Shhhhh, call Tim, I turned him onto a place to buy about as much as your little heart needs... shhhhhhhh :) |
What guns would be banned:
In article ,
says... In article , says... On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:00:28 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: 2. Only law abiding citizens who have no intention of abusing their gun rights will comply. For those with criminal intent it will still be business as usual and a thriving black market will come into existence. Yeah, like the huge black market in automobiles. Yep that would be one and these are huge highly regulated chunks of metal, not something that fits in your pocket. They still disappear without a trace, get loaded into shipping containers for the 3d world and Russia or simply get cut up for parts. So you're saying cars should not have VIN numbers and should not be traceble from owner to owner through registration, because they get stolen anyway? Go for it. BTW, guns can't be cut up for parts. I know, I know, you always confuse guns with cars. And saw blades. Gun nut logic. The parts of a gun can be disassembled and redistributed. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com