What guns would be banned:
 

In article 15dacf33-ad36-406e-90ce-
, says...

On Feb 3, 7:04*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:
This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing
something".
The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they
see which of these rules survive the vote.
The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun
designed to that rule.

Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide.....

If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect
them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than
simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line.

This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on
speeding.

... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying
weapons in the first place."

Is that like allowing illegals to have drivers licenses so they can
buy car insurance?

Cite?

What guns would be banned:
 

In article ,
says...

On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established.
None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or
San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania.
Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where
Americans are.
Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use
their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college.
Then they'll get thrown out of state power too.
Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead
species as far as wielding political power.
And that's a good thing for everybody else.




This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid
accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud
of yourself you are... LOL...

And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of
course, arguing any of the facts presented.

What guns would be banned:
 

In article ,
says...

On 2/3/2013 9:15 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/3/13 9:02 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established.
None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or
San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania.
Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where
Americans are.
Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use
their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college.
Then they'll get thrown out of state power too.
Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead
species as far as wielding political power.
And that's a good thing for everybody else.




This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid
accusations into one post as possible

That's pretty much all you do here, little ****.


Wow, I'm hurt..

I guess being hurt is easier than arguing any real FACTS about the post,
eh?

What guns would be banned:
 

On 2/4/13 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established.
None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or
San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania.
Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where
Americans are.
Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use
their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college.
Then they'll get thrown out of state power too.
Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead
species as far as wielding political power.
And that's a good thing for everybody else.




This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid
accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud
of yourself you are... LOL...

And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of
course, arguing any of the facts presented.



"Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal."

-Stupid Scotty

What guns would be banned:
 

On 2/4/2013 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established.
None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or
San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania.
Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where
Americans are.
Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use
their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college.
Then they'll get thrown out of state power too.
Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead
species as far as wielding political power.
And that's a good thing for everybody else.




This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid
accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud
of yourself you are... LOL...

And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of
course, arguing any of the facts presented.


Why would I argue such nonsense...Am I supposed to address the "Cracker
gun nuts"....or point out that "Jerry rigging" is the dems specialty, or
"old white men..."

It's not a statement or a question, it's more harryisms, just trying to
see how far into the insult paragraph folks will read...

What guns would be banned:
 

On 2/4/2013 8:50 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established.
None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or
San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania.
Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's
where
Americans are.
Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use
their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college.
Then they'll get thrown out of state power too.
Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead
species as far as wielding political power.
And that's a good thing for everybody else.




This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid
accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud
of yourself you are... LOL...

And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of
course, arguing any of the facts presented.



"Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal."

-Stupid Scotty


"****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic
University of America....

What guns would be banned:
 

On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:



"Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal."

-Stupid Scotty


"****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr.

Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after
people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in
his closet.

What guns would be banned:
 

On 2/4/2013 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/4/2013 8:50 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established.
None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or
San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania.
Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's
where
Americans are.
Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use
their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college.
Then they'll get thrown out of state power too.
Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead
species as far as wielding political power.
And that's a good thing for everybody else.




This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid
accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how
proud
of yourself you are... LOL...

And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of
course, arguing any of the facts presented.



"Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal."

-Stupid Scotty


"****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic
University of America....

Besides, we know harry only jailbroke his phone to streal resources from
others, why else do you do it.. LOL! This is the same guy who had
hundreds of stolen movies on a computer and has freely admitted that..
Yeah, harry is a crook.. Now go hide some more of those stolen assets
harry, boo, the tax man is watching... LOL!

What guns would be banned:
 

On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:



"Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal."

-Stupid Scotty


"****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr.

Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after
people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in
his closet.

You are a crook, defend that...

What guns would be banned:
 

In article ,
says...

On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:



"Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal."

-Stupid Scotty


"****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr.

Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after
people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in
his closet.

You are a crook, defend that...

So aren't you then.