BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   What guns would be banned: (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/154880-what-guns-would-banned.html)

ESAD February 6th 13 08:23 PM

What guns would be banned:
 
On 2/6/13 4:22 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:50:24 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 2/6/13 2:43 PM,
wrote:

These people don't want a reasonable solution, they just want the
issue.
The only real solution that would satisfy them is the total removal of
firearms from the public by any means necessary.
If you talk to them long enough that finally gets blurted out.


That isn't happening, but...it's a good goal, so long as it includes
"everyone."


That is what the bumper sticker is all about

"When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns".

Heroin has been outlawed for the best part of a century and outlaws
don't seem to have any trouble getting it.
Do we really want to push the gun business underground? Then we become
Mexico.



Everyone means everyone.

JustWaitAFrekinMinute February 6th 13 08:35 PM

What guns would be banned:
 
On 2/6/2013 3:15 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:43:58 -0600, wrote:

On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:10:47 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote:

I think they are saying, why not start enforcing the laws we have
before we pass a bunch more?

Amen. Especially when the 'bunch more' would do nothing to prevent slaughters like Sandy Hook (by
the liberals' own admission).


These people don't want a reasonable solution, they just want the
issue.
The only real solution that would satisfy them is the total removal of
firearms from the public by any means necessary.
If you talk to them long enough that finally gets blurted out.


Yup. Just leaving guns in the hands of criminals would be the solution - as long as there was a huge
government agency to make sure the law-abiding citizens didn't have guns.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

You know you live in a Country run by idiots if... You have to have your
parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion.


That's the plan..

iBoaterer[_2_] February 6th 13 08:44 PM

What guns would be banned:
 
In article ,
says...

On 2/6/2013 3:15 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:43:58 -0600,
wrote:

On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:10:47 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote:

I think they are saying, why not start enforcing the laws we have
before we pass a bunch more?

Amen. Especially when the 'bunch more' would do nothing to prevent slaughters like Sandy Hook (by
the liberals' own admission).

These people don't want a reasonable solution, they just want the
issue.
The only real solution that would satisfy them is the total removal of
firearms from the public by any means necessary.
If you talk to them long enough that finally gets blurted out.


Yup. Just leaving guns in the hands of criminals would be the solution - as long as there was a huge
government agency to make sure the law-abiding citizens didn't have guns.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

You know you live in a Country run by idiots if... You have to have your
parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion.


That's the plan..


Cite, liar?

ESAD February 6th 13 09:26 PM

What guns would be banned:
 
On 2/6/13 3:15 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:43:58 -0600, wrote:

On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:10:47 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote:

I think they are saying, why not start enforcing the laws we have
before we pass a bunch more?

Amen. Especially when the 'bunch more' would do nothing to prevent slaughters like Sandy Hook (by
the liberals' own admission).


These people don't want a reasonable solution, they just want the
issue.
The only real solution that would satisfy them is the total removal of
firearms from the public by any means necessary.
If you talk to them long enough that finally gets blurted out.


Yup. Just leaving guns in the hands of criminals would be the solution - as long as there was a huge
government agency to make sure the law-abiding citizens didn't have guns.


Salmonbait

--


Let's see...you spent most of your active working life working for the
U.S. Army, a huge government agency, then you worked for the Fairfax
County school system, another huge government agency, and your wife
worked as a civilian for the federal government...

....and you are opposed to government agencies.

You need to spend a lot less time in the tanning booth.


JustWaitAFrekinMinute February 7th 13 05:05 AM

What guns would be banned:
 
On 2/6/2013 11:10 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:23:56 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 2/6/13 4:22 PM,
wrote:

That isn't happening, but...it's a good goal, so long as it includes
"everyone."

That is what the bumper sticker is all about

"When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns".

Heroin has been outlawed for the best part of a century and outlaws
don't seem to have any trouble getting it.
Do we really want to push the gun business underground? Then we become
Mexico.



Everyone means everyone.


OK them first


It would only make sense to take them all from the illegal owners first.
But sense is not what the democrats are looking for, the end game is
disarming the citizens... period.

ESAD February 7th 13 11:22 AM

What guns would be banned:
 
On 2/7/13 12:05 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/6/2013 11:10 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:23:56 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 2/6/13 4:22 PM,
wrote:

That isn't happening, but...it's a good goal, so long as it includes
"everyone."

That is what the bumper sticker is all about

"When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns".

Heroin has been outlawed for the best part of a century and outlaws
don't seem to have any trouble getting it.
Do we really want to push the gun business underground? Then we become
Mexico.



Everyone means everyone.


OK them first


It would only make sense to take them all from the illegal owners first.
But sense is not what the democrats are looking for, the end game is
disarming the citizens... period.



Your psychotic paranoia is amusing.

iBoaterer[_2_] February 7th 13 01:51 PM

What guns would be banned:
 
In article ,
says...

On 2/6/2013 11:10 PM,
wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:23:56 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 2/6/13 4:22 PM,
wrote:

That isn't happening, but...it's a good goal, so long as it includes
"everyone."

That is what the bumper sticker is all about

"When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns".

Heroin has been outlawed for the best part of a century and outlaws
don't seem to have any trouble getting it.
Do we really want to push the gun business underground? Then we become
Mexico.



Everyone means everyone.


OK them first


It would only make sense to take them all from the illegal owners first.
But sense is not what the democrats are looking for, the end game is
disarming the citizens... period.


Holy ****, you are bat **** insane......


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com