In article ,
says...

On 1/25/2013 12:17 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 1/25/2013 11:34 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/25/13 11:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total
registration and control....

A paper trail that follows all firearms from their manufacture through
their various purchasers is the way to go. No more paperless sales, no
more straw sales.



Yes, so when they do get enough votes in the house and senate, confiscate...

What a paranoid, delusional, insane, unemployed little brained **** you
are.


And still, I have never had to file bankruptcy or run from a state/take
all of my fake possessions out of my name, etc...

And neither have I. But you have lied. Especially that whopper about
your highly educated daughter with the great job in D.C. You know, the
one who actually works in a medical supply store? Mensa qualified....
Yeah....

On Jan 25, 8:28*am, Boating All Out wrote:
In article 23964fc7-fc2d-4d59-ba67-
, says...



http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...gal-gun-sales-...

"They will be sentenced April 15."

Not soon enough!

No, contrary to some *beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT *support
criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either.

NRA won't agree to gun registration and personal responsibility.
It would hurt sales. *Simple as that. *Deny it all you want.
Come up with all your paranoid bull**** excuses about why you don't want
gun ownership traceable.
Fact is the NRA is even fighting unlicensed sellers doing background
checks right now.
That's where the felon husband in this story got his guns.
The FFL licensed wife didn't keep good records.
NRA always fights to to reduce FFL record keeping.
So it's clear the NRA always fights to keep guns available to criminals.
It's just good business practice from their viewpoint.
They want high gun sales. *Making gun ownership traceable will hurt gun
sales.
If Fox supports the NRA, they are also fighting to keep guns available
to criminals. *And if they don't, they don't.
Reporting a news story means nothing. *That's the primary function of a
news organization.
This is all plain common sense.

None of the above.

On 1/25/2013 8:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total
registration and control....

Isn't your car registered. Isn't your boat registered... oh, nevermind.

In article , lid says...

On 1/25/2013 8:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total
registration and control....

Isn't your car registered. Isn't your boat registered... oh, nevermind.

They're coming for your car! They're coming for your car!
Hope these deep thinkers didn't register their marriages.
They're coming for your wife! They're coming for your wife!
Where's that chastity belt!? Where's that chsstity belt!?

In article df39c9b7-6bc7-462e-b0f8-
, says...

On Jan 25, 8:28*am, Boating All Out wrote:
In article 23964fc7-fc2d-4d59-ba67-
, says...



http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...gal-gun-sales-...

"They will be sentenced April 15."

Not soon enough!

No, contrary to some *beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT *support
criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either.

NRA won't agree to gun registration and personal responsibility.
It would hurt sales. *Simple as that. *Deny it all you want.
Come up with all your paranoid bull**** excuses about why you don't want
gun ownership traceable.
Fact is the NRA is even fighting unlicensed sellers doing background
checks right now.
That's where the felon husband in this story got his guns.
The FFL licensed wife didn't keep good records.
NRA always fights to to reduce FFL record keeping.
So it's clear the NRA always fights to keep guns available to criminals.
It's just good business practice from their viewpoint.
They want high gun sales. *Making gun ownership traceable will hurt gun
sales.
If Fox supports the NRA, they are also fighting to keep guns available
to criminals. *And if they don't, they don't.
Reporting a news story means nothing. *That's the primary function of a
news organization.
This is all plain common sense.

None of the above.

about 90% of guns used in crimes were stolen from a lawful owner.
Simply, if there were fewer guns to be stolen there would be fewer
crimes committed by guns.

In article ,
says...

In article , lid says...

On 1/25/2013 8:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total
registration and control....

Isn't your car registered. Isn't your boat registered... oh, nevermind.

They're coming for your car! They're coming for your car!
Hope these deep thinkers didn't register their marriages.
They're coming for your wife! They're coming for your wife!
Where's that chastity belt!? Where's that chsstity belt!?

I'm going to bet that the resident crazy Scotty will ignore this....

In article , lid says...

On 1/25/2013 8:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total
registration and control....

Isn't your car registered. Isn't your boat registered... oh, nevermind.

I didn't know there was a car amendment.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:28:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:

In article 23964fc7-fc2d-4d59-ba67-
, says...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...t-beauty-shop/

"They will be sentenced April 15."

Not soon enough!

No, contrary to some beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT support
criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either.

NRA won't agree to gun registration and personal responsibility.
It would hurt sales. Simple as that. Deny it all you want.
Come up with all your paranoid bull**** excuses about why you don't want
gun ownership traceable.
Fact is the NRA is even fighting unlicensed sellers doing background
checks right now.
That's where the felon husband in this story got his guns.
The FFL licensed wife didn't keep good records.
NRA always fights to to reduce FFL record keeping.
So it's clear the NRA always fights to keep guns available to criminals.
It's just good business practice from their viewpoint.
They want high gun sales. Making gun ownership traceable will hurt gun
sales.
If Fox supports the NRA, they are also fighting to keep guns available
to criminals. And if they don't, they don't.
Reporting a news story means nothing. That's the primary function of a
news organization.
This is all plain common sense.

Actually, I have no problem with a paper trail for guns, as long as they develop a paper trail for
voters. Every voter should have an ID to vote, just as he has one to buy beer, drive a car, or
collect welfare.

I agree.

In article ,
says...

In article , lid says...

On 1/25/2013 8:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total
registration and control....

Isn't your car registered. Isn't your boat registered... oh, nevermind.

I didn't know there was a car amendment.

whooooosh......

On 1/26/2013 11:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

In article , lid says...

On 1/25/2013 8:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total
registration and control....

Isn't your car registered. Isn't your boat registered... oh, nevermind.

They're coming for your car! They're coming for your car!
Hope these deep thinkers didn't register their marriages.
They're coming for your wife! They're coming for your wife!
Where's that chastity belt!? Where's that chsstity belt!?

I'm going to bet that the resident crazy Scotty will ignore this....


you win...