|
And to think, FOX reported it!
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...t-beauty-shop/
"They will be sentenced April 15." Not soon enough! No, contrary to some beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT support criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either. |
And to think, FOX reported it!
On 1/25/2013 9:28 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article 23964fc7-fc2d-4d59-ba67- , says... http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...t-beauty-shop/ "They will be sentenced April 15." Not soon enough! No, contrary to some beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT support criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either. NRA won't agree to gun registration and personal responsibility. When you start your rant with a political strawman/troll like that... it only dismisses any responsibility of anyone else to read your rant, thus making your opinion irrelevant. If you are not mature enough to discuss such a serious problem like an adult, you should really go play on facebook or something.. Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total registration and control.... |
And to think, FOX reported it!
On 1/25/13 11:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total registration and control.... A paper trail that follows all firearms from their manufacture through their various purchasers is the way to go. No more paperless sales, no more straw sales. |
And to think, FOX reported it!
On 1/25/2013 11:34 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/25/13 11:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total registration and control.... A paper trail that follows all firearms from their manufacture through their various purchasers is the way to go. No more paperless sales, no more straw sales. Yes, so when they do get enough votes in the house and senate, confiscate... |
And to think, FOX reported it!
In article ,
says... On 1/25/2013 9:28 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article 23964fc7-fc2d-4d59-ba67- , says... http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...t-beauty-shop/ "They will be sentenced April 15." Not soon enough! No, contrary to some beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT support criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either. NRA won't agree to gun registration and personal responsibility. When you start your rant with a political strawman/troll like that... it only dismisses any responsibility of anyone else to read your rant, thus making your opinion irrelevant. If you are not mature enough to discuss such a serious problem like an adult, you should really go play on facebook or something.. Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total registration and control.... You stupid fool, you start every one of your rants with a politics. |
And to think, FOX reported it!
|
And to think, FOX reported it!
On 1/25/2013 12:17 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 1/25/2013 11:34 AM, ESAD wrote: On 1/25/13 11:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total registration and control.... A paper trail that follows all firearms from their manufacture through their various purchasers is the way to go. No more paperless sales, no more straw sales. Yes, so when they do get enough votes in the house and senate, confiscate... What a paranoid, delusional, insane, unemployed little brained **** you are. And still, I have never had to file bankruptcy or run from a state/take all of my fake possessions out of my name, etc... |
And to think, FOX reported it!
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:28:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:
In article 23964fc7-fc2d-4d59-ba67- , says... http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...t-beauty-shop/ "They will be sentenced April 15." Not soon enough! No, contrary to some beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT support criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either. NRA won't agree to gun registration and personal responsibility. It would hurt sales. Simple as that. Deny it all you want. Come up with all your paranoid bull**** excuses about why you don't want gun ownership traceable. Fact is the NRA is even fighting unlicensed sellers doing background checks right now. That's where the felon husband in this story got his guns. The FFL licensed wife didn't keep good records. NRA always fights to to reduce FFL record keeping. So it's clear the NRA always fights to keep guns available to criminals. It's just good business practice from their viewpoint. They want high gun sales. Making gun ownership traceable will hurt gun sales. If Fox supports the NRA, they are also fighting to keep guns available to criminals. And if they don't, they don't. Reporting a news story means nothing. That's the primary function of a news organization. This is all plain common sense. Actually, I have no problem with a paper trail for guns, as long as they develop a paper trail for voters. Every voter should have an ID to vote, just as he has one to buy beer, drive a car, or collect welfare. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! |
And to think, FOX reported it!
On 1/25/13 11:49 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/25/2013 11:34 AM, ESAD wrote: On 1/25/13 11:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total registration and control.... A paper trail that follows all firearms from their manufacture through their various purchasers is the way to go. No more paperless sales, no more straw sales. Yes, so when they do get enough votes in the house and senate, confiscate... Who put that moronic idea in your head? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com