| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
And to think, FOX reported it!
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:28:02 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , lid says... On 1/25/2013 8:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total registration and control.... Isn't your car registered. Isn't your boat registered... oh, nevermind. They're coming for your car! They're coming for your car! Hope these deep thinkers didn't register their marriages. They're coming for your wife! They're coming for your wife! Where's that chastity belt!? Where's that chsstity belt!? Well, if you live in a property tax county, like Fairfax County, they might well do that. Once you register your car or trailer, the county is notified and comes at you for the property tax thereon. If the car or trailer is registered out of state, then all is well, until you get caught. Many folks keep their RV's in Prince William county just so Fairfax won't 'come get them'! Check the history of gun ownership in Britain. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
And to think, FOX reported it!
|
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
And to think, FOX reported it!
In article ,
says... In article , lid says... On 1/25/2013 8:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: Either way, nobody believes the dems want anything but total registration and control.... Isn't your car registered. Isn't your boat registered... oh, nevermind. I didn't know there was a car amendment. whooooosh...... |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
And to think, FOX reported it!
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:28:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:
In article 23964fc7-fc2d-4d59-ba67- , says... http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...t-beauty-shop/ "They will be sentenced April 15." Not soon enough! No, contrary to some beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT support criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either. NRA won't agree to gun registration and personal responsibility. It would hurt sales. Simple as that. Deny it all you want. Come up with all your paranoid bull**** excuses about why you don't want gun ownership traceable. Fact is the NRA is even fighting unlicensed sellers doing background checks right now. That's where the felon husband in this story got his guns. The FFL licensed wife didn't keep good records. NRA always fights to to reduce FFL record keeping. So it's clear the NRA always fights to keep guns available to criminals. It's just good business practice from their viewpoint. They want high gun sales. Making gun ownership traceable will hurt gun sales. If Fox supports the NRA, they are also fighting to keep guns available to criminals. And if they don't, they don't. Reporting a news story means nothing. That's the primary function of a news organization. This is all plain common sense. Actually, I have no problem with a paper trail for guns, as long as they develop a paper trail for voters. Every voter should have an ID to vote, just as he has one to buy beer, drive a car, or collect welfare. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
And to think, FOX reported it!
In article ,
says... On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:28:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article 23964fc7-fc2d-4d59-ba67- , says... http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...t-beauty-shop/ "They will be sentenced April 15." Not soon enough! No, contrary to some beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT support criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either. NRA won't agree to gun registration and personal responsibility. It would hurt sales. Simple as that. Deny it all you want. Come up with all your paranoid bull**** excuses about why you don't want gun ownership traceable. Fact is the NRA is even fighting unlicensed sellers doing background checks right now. That's where the felon husband in this story got his guns. The FFL licensed wife didn't keep good records. NRA always fights to to reduce FFL record keeping. So it's clear the NRA always fights to keep guns available to criminals. It's just good business practice from their viewpoint. They want high gun sales. Making gun ownership traceable will hurt gun sales. If Fox supports the NRA, they are also fighting to keep guns available to criminals. And if they don't, they don't. Reporting a news story means nothing. That's the primary function of a news organization. This is all plain common sense. Actually, I have no problem with a paper trail for guns, as long as they develop a paper trail for voters. Every voter should have an ID to vote, just as he has one to buy beer, drive a car, or collect welfare. I agree. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
And to think, FOX reported it!
On Jan 25, 8:28*am, Boating All Out wrote:
In article 23964fc7-fc2d-4d59-ba67- , says... http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...gal-gun-sales-... "They will be sentenced April 15." Not soon enough! No, contrary to some *beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT *support criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either. NRA won't agree to gun registration and personal responsibility. It would hurt sales. *Simple as that. *Deny it all you want. Come up with all your paranoid bull**** excuses about why you don't want gun ownership traceable. Fact is the NRA is even fighting unlicensed sellers doing background checks right now. That's where the felon husband in this story got his guns. The FFL licensed wife didn't keep good records. NRA always fights to to reduce FFL record keeping. So it's clear the NRA always fights to keep guns available to criminals. It's just good business practice from their viewpoint. They want high gun sales. *Making gun ownership traceable will hurt gun sales. If Fox supports the NRA, they are also fighting to keep guns available to criminals. *And if they don't, they don't. Reporting a news story means nothing. *That's the primary function of a news organization. This is all plain common sense. None of the above. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
And to think, FOX reported it!
In article df39c9b7-6bc7-462e-b0f8-
, says... On Jan 25, 8:28*am, Boating All Out wrote: In article 23964fc7-fc2d-4d59-ba67- , says... http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...gal-gun-sales-... "They will be sentenced April 15." Not soon enough! No, contrary to some *beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT *support criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either. NRA won't agree to gun registration and personal responsibility. It would hurt sales. *Simple as that. *Deny it all you want. Come up with all your paranoid bull**** excuses about why you don't want gun ownership traceable. Fact is the NRA is even fighting unlicensed sellers doing background checks right now. That's where the felon husband in this story got his guns. The FFL licensed wife didn't keep good records. NRA always fights to to reduce FFL record keeping. So it's clear the NRA always fights to keep guns available to criminals. It's just good business practice from their viewpoint. They want high gun sales. *Making gun ownership traceable will hurt gun sales. If Fox supports the NRA, they are also fighting to keep guns available to criminals. *And if they don't, they don't. Reporting a news story means nothing. *That's the primary function of a news organization. This is all plain common sense. None of the above. about 90% of guns used in crimes were stolen from a lawful owner. Simply, if there were fewer guns to be stolen there would be fewer crimes committed by guns. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
And to think, FOX reported it!
On 1/26/2013 11:12 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article df39c9b7-6bc7-462e-b0f8- , says... On Jan 25, 8:28 am, Boating All Out wrote: In article 23964fc7-fc2d-4d59-ba67- , says... http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...gal-gun-sales-... "They will be sentenced April 15." Not soon enough! No, contrary to some beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT support criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either. NRA won't agree to gun registration and personal responsibility. It would hurt sales. Simple as that. Deny it all you want. Come up with all your paranoid bull**** excuses about why you don't want gun ownership traceable. Fact is the NRA is even fighting unlicensed sellers doing background checks right now. That's where the felon husband in this story got his guns. The FFL licensed wife didn't keep good records. NRA always fights to to reduce FFL record keeping. So it's clear the NRA always fights to keep guns available to criminals. It's just good business practice from their viewpoint. They want high gun sales. Making gun ownership traceable will hurt gun sales. If Fox supports the NRA, they are also fighting to keep guns available to criminals. And if they don't, they don't. Reporting a news story means nothing. That's the primary function of a news organization. This is all plain common sense. None of the above. about 90% of guns used in crimes were stolen from a lawful owner. Simply, if there were fewer guns to be stolen there would be fewer crimes committed by guns. Cite? |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
And to think, FOX reported it!
In article ,
says... On 1/26/2013 11:12 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article df39c9b7-6bc7-462e-b0f8- , says... On Jan 25, 8:28 am, Boating All Out wrote: In article 23964fc7-fc2d-4d59-ba67- , says... http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...gal-gun-sales-... "They will be sentenced April 15." Not soon enough! No, contrary to some beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT support criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either. NRA won't agree to gun registration and personal responsibility. It would hurt sales. Simple as that. Deny it all you want. Come up with all your paranoid bull**** excuses about why you don't want gun ownership traceable. Fact is the NRA is even fighting unlicensed sellers doing background checks right now. That's where the felon husband in this story got his guns. The FFL licensed wife didn't keep good records. NRA always fights to to reduce FFL record keeping. So it's clear the NRA always fights to keep guns available to criminals. It's just good business practice from their viewpoint. They want high gun sales. Making gun ownership traceable will hurt gun sales. If Fox supports the NRA, they are also fighting to keep guns available to criminals. And if they don't, they don't. Reporting a news story means nothing. That's the primary function of a news organization. This is all plain common sense. None of the above. about 90% of guns used in crimes were stolen from a lawful owner. Simply, if there were fewer guns to be stolen there would be fewer crimes committed by guns. Cite? No problem.... idiot!!! http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...ocon/guns.html http://www.commongunsense.com/2012/0...e-problem.html http://extranosalley.com/?p=10368 http://abcnews.go.com/US/hot-guns-fu...tudy/story?id= 18318610 |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Wonder why this never got reported here... | General | |||
| 3, 180 Lobster Boat Sinkings Reported | General | |||
| Bigfoot sighting reported -- with photo | UK Paddle | |||
| Reported | ASA | |||
![iBoaterer[_2_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
