BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

BAR[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:28:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:

In article 23964fc7-fc2d-4d59-ba67-
, says...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/24...t-beauty-shop/

"They will be sentenced April 15."

Not soon enough!

No, contrary to some beliefs in here, the NRA does NOT support
criminal gun trade. And looks like Fox doesn't either.

NRA won't agree to gun registration and personal responsibility.
It would hurt sales. Simple as that. Deny it all you want.
Come up with all your paranoid bull**** excuses about why you don't want
gun ownership traceable.
Fact is the NRA is even fighting unlicensed sellers doing background
checks right now.
That's where the felon husband in this story got his guns.
The FFL licensed wife didn't keep good records.
NRA always fights to to reduce FFL record keeping.
So it's clear the NRA always fights to keep guns available to criminals.
It's just good business practice from their viewpoint.
They want high gun sales. Making gun ownership traceable will hurt gun
sales.
If Fox supports the NRA, they are also fighting to keep guns available
to criminals. And if they don't, they don't.
Reporting a news story means nothing. That's the primary function of a
news organization.
This is all plain common sense.

Actually, I have no problem with a paper trail for guns, as long as they develop a paper trail for
voters. Every voter should have an ID to vote, just as he has one to buy beer, drive a car, or
collect welfare.

I agree.