Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/6/2013 8:57 PM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On 1/6/13 1:09 PM, wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:36:29 -0500, ESAD wrote: Nationally, about 12 percent of all charter schools that have opened in the past two decades have shut down, according to the National Resource Center on Charter School Finance & Governance. In Florida, the failure rate is double, state records show. If the public school failure rate was even close to being below 24% with 2 to 3 times the funding, you would have an argument. These charter schools tend to address the toughest students in places where the public system has failed. I would agree most of the problem in these places lie with the lack of responsible parents but it is no more the fault of the charter system than it is the public system.. Charter schools tend to cherry pick their students, and then dismiss the "unruly" ones at a much higher rate than public schools. Shouldn't the union baby sitters in the public schools have to take care of the unruly students? They are union, and that would be work... Also it would mean they would have to give a ****... |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/6/13 11:17 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/6/2013 8:57 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 1/6/13 1:09 PM, wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:36:29 -0500, ESAD wrote: Nationally, about 12 percent of all charter schools that have opened in the past two decades have shut down, according to the National Resource Center on Charter School Finance & Governance. In Florida, the failure rate is double, state records show. If the public school failure rate was even close to being below 24% with 2 to 3 times the funding, you would have an argument. These charter schools tend to address the toughest students in places where the public system has failed. I would agree most of the problem in these places lie with the lack of responsible parents but it is no more the fault of the charter system than it is the public system.. Charter schools tend to cherry pick their students, and then dismiss the "unruly" ones at a much higher rate than public schools. Shouldn't the union baby sitters in the public schools have to take care of the unruly students? They are union, and that would be work... Also it would mean they would have to give a ****... Little Snot speaks from the experience of not being able to hold down a job as a crate stacker in a unionized food warehouse. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, January 7, 2013 7:49:18 AM UTC-4, ESAD wrote:
On 1/6/13 11:17 PM, JustWait wrote: On 1/6/2013 8:57 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 1/6/13 1:09 PM, wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:36:29 -0500, ESAD wrote: Nationally, about 12 percent of all charter schools that have opened in the past two decades have shut down, according to the National Resource Center on Charter School Finance & Governance. In Florida, the failure rate is double, state records show. If the public school failure rate was even close to being below 24% with 2 to 3 times the funding, you would have an argument. These charter schools tend to address the toughest students in places where the public system has failed. I would agree most of the problem in these places lie with the lack of responsible parents but it is no more the fault of the charter system than it is the public system.. Charter schools tend to cherry pick their students, and then dismiss the "unruly" ones at a much higher rate than public schools. Shouldn't the union baby sitters in the public schools have to take care of the unruly students? They are union, and that would be work... Also it would mean they would have to give a ****... Little Snot speaks from the experience of not being able to hold down a job as a crate stacker in a unionized food warehouse. That's because he doesn't "give a ****" about doing an honest days work. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/7/13 7:55 AM, wrote:
On Monday, January 7, 2013 7:49:18 AM UTC-4, ESAD wrote: On 1/6/13 11:17 PM, JustWait wrote: On 1/6/2013 8:57 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 1/6/13 1:09 PM, wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:36:29 -0500, ESAD wrote: Nationally, about 12 percent of all charter schools that have opened in the past two decades have shut down, according to the National Resource Center on Charter School Finance & Governance. In Florida, the failure rate is double, state records show. If the public school failure rate was even close to being below 24% with 2 to 3 times the funding, you would have an argument. These charter schools tend to address the toughest students in places where the public system has failed. I would agree most of the problem in these places lie with the lack of responsible parents but it is no more the fault of the charter system than it is the public system.. Charter schools tend to cherry pick their students, and then dismiss the "unruly" ones at a much higher rate than public schools. Shouldn't the union baby sitters in the public schools have to take care of the unruly students? They are union, and that would be work... Also it would mean they would have to give a ****... Little Snot speaks from the experience of not being able to hold down a job as a crate stacker in a unionized food warehouse. That's because he doesn't "give a ****" about doing an honest days work. And doesn't know what an honest day's work is... |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
On 1/6/2013 8:57 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 1/6/13 1:09 PM, wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:36:29 -0500, ESAD wrote: Nationally, about 12 percent of all charter schools that have opened in the past two decades have shut down, according to the National Resource Center on Charter School Finance & Governance. In Florida, the failure rate is double, state records show. If the public school failure rate was even close to being below 24% with 2 to 3 times the funding, you would have an argument. These charter schools tend to address the toughest students in places where the public system has failed. I would agree most of the problem in these places lie with the lack of responsible parents but it is no more the fault of the charter system than it is the public system.. Charter schools tend to cherry pick their students, and then dismiss the "unruly" ones at a much higher rate than public schools. Shouldn't the union baby sitters in the public schools have to take care of the unruly students? They are union, and that would be work... Also it would mean they would have to give a ****... Wow, awhile back you were very proud that your daughter allegedly graduated from public school, why the change of heart? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:12:54 -0500, wrote:
On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 20:30:40 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/6/13 1:09 PM, wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:36:29 -0500, ESAD wrote: Nationally, about 12 percent of all charter schools that have opened in the past two decades have shut down, according to the National Resource Center on Charter School Finance & Governance. In Florida, the failure rate is double, state records show. If the public school failure rate was even close to being below 24% with 2 to 3 times the funding, you would have an argument. These charter schools tend to address the toughest students in places where the public system has failed. I would agree most of the problem in these places lie with the lack of responsible parents but it is no more the fault of the charter system than it is the public system.. Charter schools tend to cherry pick their students, and then dismiss the "unruly" ones at a much higher rate than public schools. Is that a bad thing? Why should thugs and morons be the lowest common denominator in schools, setting the level for everyone else? I know everyone likes to point to European schools as a model but the first thing you see there is they discriminate against students who can't keep up and who are dragging the rest of the class down. They get sent to "academically challenged kid" school and end up as laborers if they can't compete in more advanced classes. We will not do that here because they would not like the lack of diversity that results ... in both schools ... even when challenged kid school gets the most money (Montgomery County got in trouble for that) === Some public schools seem to do a better job of side stepping that issue than others by creating a "school within a school" that has invisible walls. Both of my kids attended public schools with a very diverse student body but those with good learning skills and academic potential had their own program for all intents and purposes. It seemed to work well for everyone and I never heard any complaints about discrimination. Kids who were disruptive were dealt with very firmly. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
voter fraud | General | |||
Cap and fraud... | General | |||
blocking a fraud | ASA | |||
Booby a fraud? | ASA |