|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article ,
says... On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:00:10 -0500, JustWait wrote: On 1/8/2013 10:39 AM, wrote: On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:39:00 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:24:51 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:11:01 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , Once again, I'll ask. Are you really trying to tell people this is the whole bill? Yes and I am doing it without the 3d grade insults you can't seem to avoid when you are wrong. Well, 1, it's not the whole bill, by far. 2, it's not a bill for Sandy relief. So.... nice try. Well 1 it IS the whole bill and 2 it is what they are calling the sandy bill. It will fund the flood relief, emergency housing and other FEMA functions. WHO is calling it the Sandy bill? Cite please. MSNBC http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/01/04/sandy-aid-bill-passes/ CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/04/politics/house-sandy-bill-vote/index.html Huff Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/04/hurricane-sandy-aid_n_2409538.html Fox http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/05/congress-passes-7-billion-sandy-bill/ Is that enough or should I go through the rest of the media sites. LOL... Who would you think would say it? Reid and Boehner called it Sandy relief too. Bull****. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/8/13 12:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:39:13 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/8/13 11:34 AM, wrote: Who would you think would say it? Reid and Boehner called it Sandy relief too. It will be interesting to see what sort of bill for actual Sandy relief is proposed and passed. If the Repugnicants don't allow it, it will be even more interesting to see what happens the next time there is a major natural disaster in their congressional districts. Something horrific in Texas, Alabama, Arizona (earthquakes and locusts?) and the Dakotas... :) For all practical purposes, this was Sandy relief. It should all be coming through FEMA anyway and that is who got the extra $9 billion Nine billion won't begin to touch what is needed to bring back the devastated areas. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/8/2013 12:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:39:13 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/8/13 11:34 AM, wrote: Who would you think would say it? Reid and Boehner called it Sandy relief too. It will be interesting to see what sort of bill for actual Sandy relief is proposed and passed. If the Repugnicants don't allow it, it will be even more interesting to see what happens the next time there is a major natural disaster in their congressional districts. Something horrific in Texas, Alabama, Arizona (earthquakes and locusts?) and the Dakotas... :) For all practical purposes, this was Sandy relief. It should all be coming through FEMA anyway and that is who got the extra $9 billion And all in all, it's just a joke and a tool the dems used to smash the republicans again... The fact is, it was already funded with 5 billion sitting in banks waiting to be handed out already.... |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article , says...
On 1/8/2013 12:18 PM, wrote: On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:39:13 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/8/13 11:34 AM, wrote: Who would you think would say it? Reid and Boehner called it Sandy relief too. It will be interesting to see what sort of bill for actual Sandy relief is proposed and passed. If the Repugnicants don't allow it, it will be even more interesting to see what happens the next time there is a major natural disaster in their congressional districts. Something horrific in Texas, Alabama, Arizona (earthquakes and locusts?) and the Dakotas... :) For all practical purposes, this was Sandy relief. It should all be coming through FEMA anyway and that is who got the extra $9 billion And all in all, it's just a joke and a tool the dems used to smash the republicans again... The fact is, it was already funded with 5 billion sitting in banks waiting to be handed out already.... Now, do tell, just how did that happen?? I know you can't answer because it's insane bull**** in your head and your head only. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/8/13 7:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:20:44 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/8/13 12:18 PM, wrote: For all practical purposes, this was Sandy relief. It should all be coming through FEMA anyway and that is who got the extra $9 billion Nine billion won't begin to touch what is needed to bring back the devastated areas. Most of that damage is not the federal government's problem. FEMA really just sells flood insurance and if people chose to gamble and not buy it, they lost. I am not covering your blackjack losses at Blackwood either. If the damage is not from flood, private insurance should be handling it. Private insurance companies go out of there way to blame damage on "flood," even when it is not caused by a flood. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com