|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/5/13 1:15 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:40:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:13:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: And this tell that without any of that the "bill would have sailed right through"??? Please point out where. Also, how much of this **** was conjured up right in the House under Boehner??? H.R.1 was in the Senate for 9 months and had dozens of amendments added to it but it was not going anywhere until they tacked the Sandy relief on it. It was a massive pork bill, get over it. If Lautenburg and Schumer really wanted to get this passed without all the other crap they had in H.R.1 they should have just introduced Sandy relief as a separate bill. It wouldn't have mattered. The House is out of control, the Speaker can't shepherd his flock, and the Tea Party members are hell-bent on destroying government. Sixty seven RepubliThugs voted against the bill that just passed. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/5/2013 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:54:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Do you mean the statement about heroin from the DEA or are we talking about H.R.1 YOU said that if it was a clean bill it would have "sailed through". How do you know this? That is the cite I want. Clear enough? I'll be waiting. A clean bill, simply giving money to the disaster victims would have provided the political cover they had in opposing this pork laden bill. Oh, oh... so you can't prove it would have? You must be a moron!snerk.. Now prove you have been inhaling and exhaling all day long, steadily, since midnight!!!!!! LOL! |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
JustWait wrote:
On 1/5/2013 12:08 PM, wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:54:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Do you mean the statement about heroin from the DEA or are we talking about H.R.1 YOU said that if it was a clean bill it would have "sailed through". How do you know this? That is the cite I want. Clear enough? I'll be waiting. A clean bill, simply giving money to the disaster victims would have provided the political cover they had in opposing this pork laden bill. Oh, oh... so you can't prove it would have? You must be a moron!snerk.. Now prove you have been inhaling and exhaling all day long, steadily, since midnight!!!!!! LOL! When is your afib going to catch up with you, moron? |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article , says...
On 1/5/2013 12:08 PM, wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:54:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Do you mean the statement about heroin from the DEA or are we talking about H.R.1 YOU said that if it was a clean bill it would have "sailed through". How do you know this? That is the cite I want. Clear enough? I'll be waiting. A clean bill, simply giving money to the disaster victims would have provided the political cover they had in opposing this pork laden bill. Oh, oh... so you can't prove it would have? You must be a moron!snerk.. Now prove you have been inhaling and exhaling all day long, steadily, since midnight!!!!!! LOL! What a ****ing moron..... |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article , says...
JustWait wrote: On 1/5/2013 12:08 PM, wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:54:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Do you mean the statement about heroin from the DEA or are we talking about H.R.1 YOU said that if it was a clean bill it would have "sailed through". How do you know this? That is the cite I want. Clear enough? I'll be waiting. A clean bill, simply giving money to the disaster victims would have provided the political cover they had in opposing this pork laden bill. Oh, oh... so you can't prove it would have? You must be a moron!snerk.. Now prove you have been inhaling and exhaling all day long, steadily, since midnight!!!!!! LOL! When is your afib going to catch up with you, moron? Hopefully not until he pays his taxes and other debts, and the same for you. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/5/2013 12:59 PM, ESAD wrote:
JustWait wrote: On 1/5/2013 12:08 PM, wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:54:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Do you mean the statement about heroin from the DEA or are we talking about H.R.1 YOU said that if it was a clean bill it would have "sailed through". How do you know this? That is the cite I want. Clear enough? I'll be waiting. A clean bill, simply giving money to the disaster victims would have provided the political cover they had in opposing this pork laden bill. Oh, oh... so you can't prove it would have? You must be a moron!snerk.. Now prove you have been inhaling and exhaling all day long, steadily, since midnight!!!!!! LOL! When is your afib going to catch up with you, moron? When is your sleep apnea machine going to break down and leave you breathless? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com