| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article ,
says... On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:29:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.leftaction.com/action/tel...-disaster-aid- hurricane-sandy-victims Maybe if the senate had not loaded this bill up with unrelated pork, it might have had a better chance. Cite? We didn't even attack the deficit with the cliff bill. They added debt and kicked the can 2 months down the road. When will the world simply stop buying our bonds? The treasury is buying back 80% of the new issues now using money they create out of thin air. That shows how soft the market in our paper actually is. This has NOTHING to do with Boehner's not even letting the House vote on the bill, after promising Christie relief. He's a friggin' pig and should have never been elected to head the house. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/3/13 12:50 PM, JustWait wrote:
Ace of Spades HQ blogger Gabriel Malor dissected the bill: snerk Morons leading morons. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On Jan 3, 12:57*pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/3/13 12:50 PM, JustWait wrote: Ace of Spades HQ blogger Gabriel Malor dissected the bill: snerk Morons leading morons. Sandy relief shouldn't include $5.3B to the Army Corps of Engineers (that's more than their annual budget). Sandy relief shouldn't include $56.8 million for charting the debris from last year's Japanese tsunami. Sandy relief shouldn't include $41 million for eight military bases including Guantanamo Bay. Sandy relief shouldn't include $100 million for the federal Head Start day care program. Sandy relief shouldn't include $188 million for new Amtrak lines (not repair, whole new lines). Sandy relief shouldn't include $20 million for a nationwide "Water Resources Priorities Study". Sandy relief shouldn't include $4 million for the Kennedy Space Center. FEMA still has $5 billion in disaster relief funds that are expected to last until March. So we do have time to get Sandy relief right. People who are yelling, "rush rush, we must do this without thinking about it," are looking for a hand-out. Dispute the facts? Didn't think so... |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/3/13 3:30 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:15:18 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/3/13 12:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:29:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.leftaction.com/action/tel...-disaster-aid- hurricane-sandy-victims Maybe if the senate had not loaded this bill up with unrelated pork, it might have had a better chance. We didn't even attack the deficit with the cliff bill. They added debt and kicked the can 2 months down the road. When will the world simply stop buying our bonds? The treasury is buying back 80% of the new issues now using money they create out of thin air. That shows how soft the market in our paper actually is. More likely, the House Repugnants were showing the people of a "Blue State" that they really didn't give a **** about them. I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina. People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast enough to qualify as disaster relief. It took the House 10 days to past a bill that started recovery funds flowing to Katrinaville. Perhaps the reason is that Boehner is an incompetent speaker, incapable of leading his fractured party in the House. Of course, there seems to be no one else in that party capable of doing the job. No one sane wants Cantor. The Tea Party has pretty much destroyed the legislative process...and that was its goal. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article ,
says... On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:15:18 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/3/13 12:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:29:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.leftaction.com/action/tel...-disaster-aid- hurricane-sandy-victims Maybe if the senate had not loaded this bill up with unrelated pork, it might have had a better chance. We didn't even attack the deficit with the cliff bill. They added debt and kicked the can 2 months down the road. When will the world simply stop buying our bonds? The treasury is buying back 80% of the new issues now using money they create out of thin air. That shows how soft the market in our paper actually is. More likely, the House Repugnants were showing the people of a "Blue State" that they really didn't give a **** about them. I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina. People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast enough to qualify as disaster relief. Yeah, especially when you have a dictator like Boehner who wouldn't even let the House vote on relief. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/3/2013 4:05 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/3/13 3:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:15:18 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/3/13 12:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:29:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.leftaction.com/action/tel...-disaster-aid- hurricane-sandy-victims Maybe if the senate had not loaded this bill up with unrelated pork, it might have had a better chance. We didn't even attack the deficit with the cliff bill. They added debt and kicked the can 2 months down the road. When will the world simply stop buying our bonds? The treasury is buying back 80% of the new issues now using money they create out of thin air. That shows how soft the market in our paper actually is. More likely, the House Repugnants were showing the people of a "Blue State" that they really didn't give a **** about them. I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina. People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast enough to qualify as disaster relief. It took the House 10 days to past a bill that started recovery funds flowing to Katrinaville. Perhaps the reason is that Boehner is an incompetent speaker, incapable of leading his fractured party in the House. Of course, there seems to be no one else in that party capable of doing the job. No one sane wants Cantor. The Tea Party has pretty much destroyed the legislative process...and that was its goal. This from the fool who can't successfully manage his own finances. Anyone who finds you credible is likewise a fool. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/3/2013 3:30 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:15:18 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/3/13 12:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:29:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.leftaction.com/action/tel...-disaster-aid- hurricane-sandy-victims Maybe if the senate had not loaded this bill up with unrelated pork, it might have had a better chance. We didn't even attack the deficit with the cliff bill. They added debt and kicked the can 2 months down the road. When will the world simply stop buying our bonds? The treasury is buying back 80% of the new issues now using money they create out of thin air. That shows how soft the market in our paper actually is. More likely, the House Repugnants were showing the people of a "Blue State" that they really didn't give a **** about them. I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina. People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast enough to qualify as disaster relief. The guy you folks helped here is engaged to a banker from NYC... She is so frustrated talking on another group about how the FEMA money is in the banks, but not being released by the Insurance Companies... |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/3/2013 5:13 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 1/3/2013 4:05 PM, ESAD wrote: On 1/3/13 3:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:15:18 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/3/13 12:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:29:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.leftaction.com/action/tel...-disaster-aid- hurricane-sandy-victims Maybe if the senate had not loaded this bill up with unrelated pork, it might have had a better chance. We didn't even attack the deficit with the cliff bill. They added debt and kicked the can 2 months down the road. When will the world simply stop buying our bonds? The treasury is buying back 80% of the new issues now using money they create out of thin air. That shows how soft the market in our paper actually is. More likely, the House Repugnants were showing the people of a "Blue State" that they really didn't give a **** about them. I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina. People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast enough to qualify as disaster relief. It took the House 10 days to past a bill that started recovery funds flowing to Katrinaville. The bill means ****... Just like here, Katrina money didn't actually make it to the people for months. Stop wasting our time with your stupidity... Perhaps the reason is that Boehner is an incompetent speaker, incapable of leading his fractured party in the House. Of course, there seems to be no one else in that party capable of doing the job. No one sane wants Cantor. The Tea Party has pretty much destroyed the legislative process...and that was its goal. This from the fool who can't successfully manage his own finances. Anyone who finds you credible is likewise a fool. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/3/13 8:45 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/3/2013 7:00 PM, wrote: On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:05:41 -0500, ESAD wrote: I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina. People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast enough to qualify as disaster relief. It took the House 10 days to past a bill that started recovery funds flowing to Katrinaville. Mitch is saying they may have promised that money but it isn't all there yet. I haven't looked at Thomas yet but if Scotty is right and they attached the $60 million "Sandy" bill to a $500 million dollar pork fest, I agree, try again. That is one reason we are $16 trillion in debt. You can't pass a bill in congress without a pork barrel bribe for every yes vote. Seriously... The only folks who refute any facts I state here are.... well, there are none, just name callers... :) Do the homework if you want, I don't make up numbers or throw up phony arguments, that is for loogie, krause, and jps.. You post from Fox News and other crazy inaccurate bull**** right-wing sources. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/3/2013 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:45:27 -0500, JustWait wrote: On 1/3/2013 7:00 PM, wrote: I haven't looked at Thomas yet but if Scotty is right and they attached the $60 million "Sandy" bill to a $500 million dollar pork fest, I agree, try again. That is one reason we are $16 trillion in debt. You can't pass a bill in congress without a pork barrel bribe for every yes vote. Seriously... The only folks who refute any facts I state here are.... well, there are none, just name callers... :) Do the homework if you want, I don't make up numbers or throw up phony arguments, that is for loogie, krause, and jps.. I have looked it up and the bill is a lot worse than you reported. It was a bucket that sat around the Senate since February 28 collecting pork and they dug it up in late December, pasted the Sandy relief on it and sent it back to the house on 12/30 hoping nobody would have time to read it.. Well, I was just pointing out the tip of the iceberg. Fact is, nearly 65% of the money won't even get spent for up to ten years... It's not Sandy Relief at all... |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/3/2013 9:00 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/3/13 8:45 PM, JustWait wrote: On 1/3/2013 7:00 PM, wrote: On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:05:41 -0500, ESAD wrote: I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina. People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast enough to qualify as disaster relief. It took the House 10 days to past a bill that started recovery funds flowing to Katrinaville. Mitch is saying they may have promised that money but it isn't all there yet. I haven't looked at Thomas yet but if Scotty is right and they attached the $60 million "Sandy" bill to a $500 million dollar pork fest, I agree, try again. That is one reason we are $16 trillion in debt. You can't pass a bill in congress without a pork barrel bribe for every yes vote. Seriously... The only folks who refute any facts I state here are.... well, there are none, just name callers... :) Do the homework if you want, I don't make up numbers or throw up phony arguments, that is for loogie, krause, and jps.. You post from Fox News and other crazy inaccurate bull**** right-wing sources. OK We get it. You dispise logical, sensible, and caring people with good and honest motivation. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/3/2013 8:46 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:13:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:14:13 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: e looking for a hand-out. You stupid little fool, how come your party, when they HAD A CHANCE to vote on the bill overwhelmingly voted in favor of it? Are you saying that your party likes the alleged pork in the bill? Maybe if it was just a clean Sandy relief bill it would have sailed through. It was the pork that stopped it. Cite? OK how about some facts The Sandy relief was tacked onto H.R.1 a massive pork bill This is just the table of contents Beginning SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR DISASTER ASSISTANCE TITLE I AGRICULTURAL PROGRAMS Farm Service Agency emergency conservation program emergency forest restoration program CONSERVATION PROGRAMS Natural Resources Conservation Service emergency watershed protection program DOMESTIC FOOD PROGRAMS Food and Nutrition Service commodity assistance program TITLE II DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration operations, research, and facilities procurement, acquisition and construction DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE General Administration Federal Bureau of Investigation Drug Enforcement Administration Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Federal Prison System buildings and facilities SCIENCE National Aeronautics and Space Administration construction and environmental compliance and restoration Legal Services Corporation payment to the legal services corporation TITLE III DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--MILITARY Operation and Maintenance, Army Operation and Maintenance, Navy Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard PROCUREMENT Procurement of Ammunition, Army REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS Defense Working Capital Funds TITLE IV DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Corps of Engineers--Civil investigations operation and maintenance flood control and coastal emergencies expenses TITLE V INDEPENDENT AGENCIES General Services Administration real property activities federal buildings fund Small Business Administration office of inspector general disaster loans program account TITLE VI DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. Customs and Border Protection U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Coast Guard acquisition, construction, and improvements United States Secret Service Federal Emergency Management Agency disaster relief fund Disaster Assistance Direct Loan Program Account Science and Technology research, development, acquisition, and operations Domestic Nuclear Detection Office systems acquisition levees disaster recovery `SEC. 428. PUBLIC ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES. `SEC. 429. UNIFIED FEDERAL REVIEW. `SEC. 103. REFERENCES. TITLE VII DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service National Park Service historic preservation fund construction Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement oil spill research Departmental Operations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Environmental Programs and Management Hazardous Substance Superfund Leaking Underground Storage Tank Fund State and Tribal Assistance Grants RELATED AGENCIES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service capital improvement and maintenance OTHER RELATED AGENCY Smithsonian Institution salaries and expenses TITLE VIII DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration training and employment services DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families social services block grant children and family services programs Office of the Secretary public health and social services emergency fund (including transfer of funds) RELATED AGENCY Social Security Administration limitation on administrative expenses TITLE IX DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION Military Construction, Army National Guard DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Health Administration medical services medical facilities national cemetery administration Departmental Administration information technology systems construction, major projects TITLE X DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration facilities and equipment (airport and airway trust fund) Federal Highway Administration federal-aid highways emergency relief program Federal Railroad Administration grants to the national railroad passenger corporation Federal Transit Administration public transportation emergency relief program DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Community Planning and Development community development fund GENERAL PROVISIONS--THIS TITLE TITLE XI GENERAL PROVISIONS--THIS ACT VEHICLES USE IN THE WAKE OF HURRICANE SANDY INCREASED EMBASSY SECURITY PROHIBITION ON EMERGENCY SPENDING FOR PERSONS HAVING SERIOUS DELINQUENT TAX DEBTS PROHIBITION ON EMERGENCY SPENDING FOR DECEASED INDIVIDUALS When kevin says "cite" he means he can't refute the facts and he's trying to move along... |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article , says...
On 1/3/2013 8:46 PM, wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:13:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:14:13 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: e looking for a hand-out. You stupid little fool, how come your party, when they HAD A CHANCE to vote on the bill overwhelmingly voted in favor of it? Are you saying that your party likes the alleged pork in the bill? Maybe if it was just a clean Sandy relief bill it would have sailed through. It was the pork that stopped it. Cite? OK how about some facts The Sandy relief was tacked onto H.R.1 a massive pork bill This is just the table of contents Beginning SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR DISASTER ASSISTANCE TITLE I AGRICULTURAL PROGRAMS Farm Service Agency emergency conservation program emergency forest restoration program CONSERVATION PROGRAMS Natural Resources Conservation Service emergency watershed protection program DOMESTIC FOOD PROGRAMS Food and Nutrition Service commodity assistance program TITLE II DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration operations, research, and facilities procurement, acquisition and construction DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE General Administration Federal Bureau of Investigation Drug Enforcement Administration Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Federal Prison System buildings and facilities SCIENCE National Aeronautics and Space Administration construction and environmental compliance and restoration Legal Services Corporation payment to the legal services corporation TITLE III DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--MILITARY Operation and Maintenance, Army Operation and Maintenance, Navy Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard PROCUREMENT Procurement of Ammunition, Army REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS Defense Working Capital Funds TITLE IV DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Corps of Engineers--Civil investigations operation and maintenance flood control and coastal emergencies expenses TITLE V INDEPENDENT AGENCIES General Services Administration real property activities federal buildings fund Small Business Administration office of inspector general disaster loans program account TITLE VI DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. Customs and Border Protection U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Coast Guard acquisition, construction, and improvements United States Secret Service Federal Emergency Management Agency disaster relief fund Disaster Assistance Direct Loan Program Account Science and Technology research, development, acquisition, and operations Domestic Nuclear Detection Office systems acquisition levees disaster recovery `SEC. 428. PUBLIC ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES. `SEC. 429. UNIFIED FEDERAL REVIEW. `SEC. 103. REFERENCES. TITLE VII DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service National Park Service historic preservation fund construction Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement oil spill research Departmental Operations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Environmental Programs and Management Hazardous Substance Superfund Leaking Underground Storage Tank Fund State and Tribal Assistance Grants RELATED AGENCIES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service capital improvement and maintenance OTHER RELATED AGENCY Smithsonian Institution salaries and expenses TITLE VIII DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration training and employment services DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families social services block grant children and family services programs Office of the Secretary public health and social services emergency fund (including transfer of funds) RELATED AGENCY Social Security Administration limitation on administrative expenses TITLE IX DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION Military Construction, Army National Guard DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Health Administration medical services medical facilities national cemetery administration Departmental Administration information technology systems construction, major projects TITLE X DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration facilities and equipment (airport and airway trust fund) Federal Highway Administration federal-aid highways emergency relief program Federal Railroad Administration grants to the national railroad passenger corporation Federal Transit Administration public transportation emergency relief program DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Community Planning and Development community development fund GENERAL PROVISIONS--THIS TITLE TITLE XI GENERAL PROVISIONS--THIS ACT VEHICLES USE IN THE WAKE OF HURRICANE SANDY INCREASED EMBASSY SECURITY PROHIBITION ON EMERGENCY SPENDING FOR PERSONS HAVING SERIOUS DELINQUENT TAX DEBTS PROHIBITION ON EMERGENCY SPENDING FOR DECEASED INDIVIDUALS When kevin says "cite" he means he can't refute the facts and he's trying to move along... Uh, no, I mean I would like to see some evidence of your insane bull****. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article , says...
On 1/3/2013 5:13 PM, Meyer wrote: On 1/3/2013 4:05 PM, ESAD wrote: On 1/3/13 3:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:15:18 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/3/13 12:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:29:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.leftaction.com/action/tel...-disaster-aid- hurricane-sandy-victims Maybe if the senate had not loaded this bill up with unrelated pork, it might have had a better chance. We didn't even attack the deficit with the cliff bill. They added debt and kicked the can 2 months down the road. When will the world simply stop buying our bonds? The treasury is buying back 80% of the new issues now using money they create out of thin air. That shows how soft the market in our paper actually is. More likely, the House Repugnants were showing the people of a "Blue State" that they really didn't give a **** about them. I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina. People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast enough to qualify as disaster relief. It took the House 10 days to past a bill that started recovery funds flowing to Katrinaville. The bill means ****... Just like here, Katrina money didn't actually make it to the people for months. Stop wasting our time with your stupidity... Perhaps the reason is that Boehner is an incompetent speaker, incapable of leading his fractured party in the House. Of course, there seems to be no one else in that party capable of doing the job. No one sane wants Cantor. The Tea Party has pretty much destroyed the legislative process...and that was its goal. This from the fool who can't successfully manage his own finances. Anyone who finds you credible is likewise a fool. It's amazing to me that a human (and in Scotty's case I use the term lightly) can actually be so damned one sided and narrow minded that after allegedly knowing people going through **** with Sandy that he is making excuses for Boehner not letting the House vote on relief. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article , says...
On 1/3/2013 7:00 PM, wrote: On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:05:41 -0500, ESAD wrote: I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina. People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast enough to qualify as disaster relief. It took the House 10 days to past a bill that started recovery funds flowing to Katrinaville. Mitch is saying they may have promised that money but it isn't all there yet. I haven't looked at Thomas yet but if Scotty is right and they attached the $60 million "Sandy" bill to a $500 million dollar pork fest, I agree, try again. That is one reason we are $16 trillion in debt. You can't pass a bill in congress without a pork barrel bribe for every yes vote. Seriously... The only folks who refute any facts I state here are.... well, there are none, just name callers... :) Do the homework if you want, I don't make up numbers or throw up phony arguments, that is for loogie, krause, and jps.. Really? I refute the above facts, please give cite. How's that? |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article , says...
On 1/3/2013 9:33 PM, wrote: On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:00:18 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/3/13 8:45 PM, JustWait wrote: That is one reason we are $16 trillion in debt. You can't pass a bill in congress without a pork barrel bribe for every yes vote. Seriously... The only folks who refute any facts I state here are.... well, there are none, just name callers... :) Do the homework if you want, I don't make up numbers or throw up phony arguments, that is for loogie, krause, and jps.. You post from Fox News and other crazy inaccurate bull**** right-wing sources. Actually the story was a lot of places while I was trying to track down the bill number. In the end I found it by the recorded votes on Thomas (Library of congress web site) They tacked Sandy relief on a real porkathon. What Scotty listed was a small part of it. It would be a lot quicker if you just told harry to **** off:) Well, some people aren't low life scum like you. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article ,
says... On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:45:27 -0500, JustWait wrote: On 1/3/2013 7:00 PM, wrote: I haven't looked at Thomas yet but if Scotty is right and they attached the $60 million "Sandy" bill to a $500 million dollar pork fest, I agree, try again. That is one reason we are $16 trillion in debt. You can't pass a bill in congress without a pork barrel bribe for every yes vote. Seriously... The only folks who refute any facts I state here are.... well, there are none, just name callers... :) Do the homework if you want, I don't make up numbers or throw up phony arguments, that is for loogie, krause, and jps.. I have looked it up and the bill is a lot worse than you reported. It was a bucket that sat around the Senate since February 28 collecting pork and they dug it up in late December, pasted the Sandy relief on it and sent it back to the house on 12/30 hoping nobody would have time to read it.. Cite? |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article , says...
On 1/3/2013 9:07 PM, wrote: On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:45:27 -0500, JustWait wrote: On 1/3/2013 7:00 PM, wrote: I haven't looked at Thomas yet but if Scotty is right and they attached the $60 million "Sandy" bill to a $500 million dollar pork fest, I agree, try again. That is one reason we are $16 trillion in debt. You can't pass a bill in congress without a pork barrel bribe for every yes vote. Seriously... The only folks who refute any facts I state here are.... well, there are none, just name callers... :) Do the homework if you want, I don't make up numbers or throw up phony arguments, that is for loogie, krause, and jps.. I have looked it up and the bill is a lot worse than you reported. It was a bucket that sat around the Senate since February 28 collecting pork and they dug it up in late December, pasted the Sandy relief on it and sent it back to the house on 12/30 hoping nobody would have time to read it.. Well, I was just pointing out the tip of the iceberg. Fact is, nearly 65% of the money won't even get spent for up to ten years... It's not Sandy Relief at all... Cite? |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article , says...
On 1/3/2013 3:36 PM, wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:14:13 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: e looking for a hand-out. You stupid little fool, how come your party, when they HAD A CHANCE to vote on the bill overwhelmingly voted in favor of it? Are you saying that your party likes the alleged pork in the bill? Maybe if it was just a clean Sandy relief bill it would have sailed through. It was the pork that stopped it. This is like the "cliff" bill that added a third of a trillion in EXTRA spending and offset it with a fraction of that in extra revenue. The Democrats love the direction the country is going.. They really don't give a **** about our kids... This from the moron who has his daughter watch while he posts to people about sucking dicks, etc. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article , says...
On 1/3/2013 3:30 PM, wrote: On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:15:18 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/3/13 12:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:29:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.leftaction.com/action/tel...-disaster-aid- hurricane-sandy-victims Maybe if the senate had not loaded this bill up with unrelated pork, it might have had a better chance. We didn't even attack the deficit with the cliff bill. They added debt and kicked the can 2 months down the road. When will the world simply stop buying our bonds? The treasury is buying back 80% of the new issues now using money they create out of thin air. That shows how soft the market in our paper actually is. More likely, the House Repugnants were showing the people of a "Blue State" that they really didn't give a **** about them. I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina. People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast enough to qualify as disaster relief. The guy you folks helped here is engaged to a banker from NYC... She is so frustrated talking on another group about how the FEMA money is in the banks, but not being released by the Insurance Companies... Yeah, sure. Right. Liar. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/5/2013 1:15 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:40:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:13:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: And this tell that without any of that the "bill would have sailed right through"??? Please point out where. Also, how much of this **** was conjured up right in the House under Boehner??? H.R.1 was in the Senate for 9 months and had dozens of amendments added to it but it was not going anywhere until they tacked the Sandy relief on it. It was a massive pork bill, get over it. If Lautenburg and Schumer really wanted to get this passed without all the other crap they had in H.R.1 they should have just introduced Sandy relief as a separate bill. Why can't folks see that? |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/5/13 1:15 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:40:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:13:31 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: And this tell that without any of that the "bill would have sailed right through"??? Please point out where. Also, how much of this **** was conjured up right in the House under Boehner??? H.R.1 was in the Senate for 9 months and had dozens of amendments added to it but it was not going anywhere until they tacked the Sandy relief on it. It was a massive pork bill, get over it. If Lautenburg and Schumer really wanted to get this passed without all the other crap they had in H.R.1 they should have just introduced Sandy relief as a separate bill. It wouldn't have mattered. The House is out of control, the Speaker can't shepherd his flock, and the Tea Party members are hell-bent on destroying government. Sixty seven RepubliThugs voted against the bill that just passed. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/5/2013 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:54:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Do you mean the statement about heroin from the DEA or are we talking about H.R.1 YOU said that if it was a clean bill it would have "sailed through". How do you know this? That is the cite I want. Clear enough? I'll be waiting. A clean bill, simply giving money to the disaster victims would have provided the political cover they had in opposing this pork laden bill. Oh, oh... so you can't prove it would have? You must be a moron!snerk.. Now prove you have been inhaling and exhaling all day long, steadily, since midnight!!!!!! LOL! |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
JustWait wrote:
On 1/5/2013 12:08 PM, wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:54:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Do you mean the statement about heroin from the DEA or are we talking about H.R.1 YOU said that if it was a clean bill it would have "sailed through". How do you know this? That is the cite I want. Clear enough? I'll be waiting. A clean bill, simply giving money to the disaster victims would have provided the political cover they had in opposing this pork laden bill. Oh, oh... so you can't prove it would have? You must be a moron!snerk.. Now prove you have been inhaling and exhaling all day long, steadily, since midnight!!!!!! LOL! When is your afib going to catch up with you, moron? |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article , says...
On 1/5/2013 12:08 PM, wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:54:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Do you mean the statement about heroin from the DEA or are we talking about H.R.1 YOU said that if it was a clean bill it would have "sailed through". How do you know this? That is the cite I want. Clear enough? I'll be waiting. A clean bill, simply giving money to the disaster victims would have provided the political cover they had in opposing this pork laden bill. Oh, oh... so you can't prove it would have? You must be a moron!snerk.. Now prove you have been inhaling and exhaling all day long, steadily, since midnight!!!!!! LOL! What a ****ing moron..... |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article , says...
JustWait wrote: On 1/5/2013 12:08 PM, wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:54:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Do you mean the statement about heroin from the DEA or are we talking about H.R.1 YOU said that if it was a clean bill it would have "sailed through". How do you know this? That is the cite I want. Clear enough? I'll be waiting. A clean bill, simply giving money to the disaster victims would have provided the political cover they had in opposing this pork laden bill. Oh, oh... so you can't prove it would have? You must be a moron!snerk.. Now prove you have been inhaling and exhaling all day long, steadily, since midnight!!!!!! LOL! When is your afib going to catch up with you, moron? Hopefully not until he pays his taxes and other debts, and the same for you. |
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/5/2013 12:59 PM, ESAD wrote:
JustWait wrote: On 1/5/2013 12:08 PM, wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:54:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Do you mean the statement about heroin from the DEA or are we talking about H.R.1 YOU said that if it was a clean bill it would have "sailed through". How do you know this? That is the cite I want. Clear enough? I'll be waiting. A clean bill, simply giving money to the disaster victims would have provided the political cover they had in opposing this pork laden bill. Oh, oh... so you can't prove it would have? You must be a moron!snerk.. Now prove you have been inhaling and exhaling all day long, steadily, since midnight!!!!!! LOL! When is your afib going to catch up with you, moron? When is your sleep apnea machine going to break down and leave you breathless? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:42 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com