|
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
|
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
|
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/26/2012 2:07 PM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned NBC news' David Gregory is in some serious trouble because he asked the police if he could use a 30 round magazine and was told no they are illegal to poses in DC. Gregory did it anyway and is now facing the possibility of being arrested, convicted, fined and jailed. Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/26/12 4:15 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 12/26/2012 2:07 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned NBC news' David Gregory is in some serious trouble because he asked the police if he could use a 30 round magazine and was told no they are illegal to poses in DC. Gregory did it anyway and is now facing the possibility of being arrested, convicted, fined and jailed. Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! Do you think the attorney general of the United States is going to involve himself in a matter that falls strictly under the purview of the District of Columbia? I find it hard to believe you actually graduated from a public high school in Connecticut. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
|
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article ,
says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
|
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article ,
says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. I never even think about it unless it's in the news. You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. It's the nature of the gun nut. Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern. http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-violence.html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Cracker gun laws and cracker gun nuts make a good combination for that. Suicide is included, and it's easy to believe living in a cracker state and having easy access to a gun makes suicide more likely. I've read that some bridge jumping attempted suiciders thought on the way down, "Whoa, shouldn't have done that." Guns work well to prevent any second thoughts. But depression/suicide is a different subject. Of course that Lanza woman was a gun nut cracker, so CT lost on that one. That's just how it is. You shouldn't let what the NRA says override facts and common sense. But that's your call. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article , says...
On 12/26/2012 2:07 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned NBC news' David Gregory is in some serious trouble because he asked the police if he could use a 30 round magazine and was told no they are illegal to poses in DC. Gregory did it anyway and is now facing the possibility of being arrested, convicted, fined and jailed. Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! What does Holder have to do with local law, idiot? |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article , lid says...
On 12/26/2012 1:20 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. I thought you had a better understanding of statistics. Me too, but I guess not. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article ,
says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:15:27 -0500, JustWait wrote: On 12/26/2012 2:07 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned NBC news' David Gregory is in some serious trouble because he asked the police if he could use a 30 round magazine and was told no they are illegal to poses in DC. Gregory did it anyway and is now facing the possibility of being arrested, convicted, fined and jailed. Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! I hope that by the time the DC cops get around to going over there somebody has the good sense to remove the follower and spring from that magazine. Then it is just a metal box. Yeah, commit another crime by withholding evidence, that's a great idea, get that directly from the NRA did you? For that matter you could just put a plug under the magazine follower so it only takes 10 rounds. There were a bunch of Chinese magazines that came in during the ban, made legal with the plug. See above. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On Dec 27, 2:17*am, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy.. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. *Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. *Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. *I never even think about it unless it's in the news. *You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. *It's the nature of the gun nut. *Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. *Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-violence.html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article ,
says... On 12/26/12 4:15 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/26/2012 2:07 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned NBC news' David Gregory is in some serious trouble because he asked the police if he could use a 30 round magazine and was told no they are illegal to poses in DC. Gregory did it anyway and is now facing the possibility of being arrested, convicted, fined and jailed. Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! Do you think the attorney general of the United States is going to involve himself in a matter that falls strictly under the purview of the District of Columbia? I find it hard to believe you actually graduated from a public high school in Connecticut. Check the Residence Act of 1790. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article ,
says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:54:55 -0800, thumper wrote: On 12/26/2012 1:20 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. I thought you had a better understanding of statistics. I know a whole lot about statistics. Mostly that you can selectively create "views" from a database that will prove just about anything you like by what you include and what you leave out. That is why the NRA can use that same data set and get perfectly valid numbers that say more guns create less crime. If I was going to dig into their numbers I would start with how many of the "banned" gun styles are responsible for the murders in the states where they are not banned. "Assault weapons" are not really used in that many murders but they tend to be the ones that make the news. Nobody is going to tune in to hear about a couple of black gangsters who are killed by another black gangster over a drug corner. That will usually be with a $100 stolen handgun not an AR. I think you would find out that the "banned" gun styles that are most often used in crimes are of the type pistol. Since the vast majority of pistols are semi-automatics, where revolvers and "autos" are effectively the same due to their operation what specifiability are we going to ban? |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article 728c3341-c7bc-43e3-8317-ed3b501300d7
@s6g2000pby.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 27, 2:17*am, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. *Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. *Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. *I never even think about it unless it's in the news. *You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. *It's the nature of the gun nut. *Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. *Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-violence.html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. More total insanity from Scotty!!! |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article ,
says... In article , says... On 12/26/12 4:15 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/26/2012 2:07 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned NBC news' David Gregory is in some serious trouble because he asked the police if he could use a 30 round magazine and was told no they are illegal to poses in DC. Gregory did it anyway and is now facing the possibility of being arrested, convicted, fined and jailed. Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! Do you think the attorney general of the United States is going to involve himself in a matter that falls strictly under the purview of the District of Columbia? I find it hard to believe you actually graduated from a public high school in Connecticut. Check the Residence Act of 1790. That's not what was asked. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/27/12 9:09 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... On 12/26/12 4:15 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/26/2012 2:07 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned NBC news' David Gregory is in some serious trouble because he asked the police if he could use a 30 round magazine and was told no they are illegal to poses in DC. Gregory did it anyway and is now facing the possibility of being arrested, convicted, fined and jailed. Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! Do you think the attorney general of the United States is going to involve himself in a matter that falls strictly under the purview of the District of Columbia? I find it hard to believe you actually graduated from a public high school in Connecticut. Check the Residence Act of 1790. That's not what was asked. The Residence Act? Hehehe. The alleged violation relating to the hi-cap mag is related to laws of the District of Columbia. The hi-cap mags are not illegal under federal law. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On Dec 27, 9:09*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 728c3341-c7bc-43e3-8317-ed3b501300d7 @s6g2000pby.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 27, 2:17*am, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. *Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. *Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. *I never even think about it unless it's in the news. *You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. *It's the nature of the gun nut. *Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. *Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...violence..html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. More total insanity from Scotty!!! More lazy trolling from kevin!!! |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/27/12 9:45 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Dec 27, 9:09 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article 728c3341-c7bc-43e3-8317-ed3b501300d7 @s6g2000pby.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 27, 2:17 am, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. I never even think about it unless it's in the news. You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. It's the nature of the gun nut. Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-violence.html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. More total insanity from Scotty!!! More lazy trolling from kevin!!! You think the craziness you post here is worth a response that takes any effort? |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article 043208cc-613c-4249-9a46-
, says... On Dec 27, 9:09*am, iBoaterer wrote: In article 728c3341-c7bc-43e3-8317-ed3b501300d7 @s6g2000pby.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 27, 2:17*am, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. *Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. *Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. *I never even think about it unless it's in the news. *You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. *It's the nature of the gun nut. *Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. *Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-violence.html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. More total insanity from Scotty!!! More lazy trolling from kevin!!! Do, tell, idiot, just what in your above insane babble is based on any facts, and what are those facts? I'm guessing I'll hear crickets. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/27/2012 9:48 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 12/27/12 9:45 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Dec 27, 9:09 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article 728c3341-c7bc-43e3-8317-ed3b501300d7 @s6g2000pby.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 27, 2:17 am, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. I never even think about it unless it's in the news. You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. It's the nature of the gun nut. Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-violence.html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. More total insanity from Scotty!!! More lazy trolling from kevin!!! You think the craziness you post here is worth a response that takes any effort? What joy do you get from flapping your gums with your brain disengaged? |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/27/2012 10:02 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 12/27/2012 9:48 AM, ESAD wrote: On 12/27/12 9:45 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Dec 27, 9:09 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article 728c3341-c7bc-43e3-8317-ed3b501300d7 @s6g2000pby.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 27, 2:17 am, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. I never even think about it unless it's in the news. You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. It's the nature of the gun nut. Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-violence.html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. More total insanity from Scotty!!! More lazy trolling from kevin!!! You think the craziness you post here is worth a response that takes any effort? What joy do you get from flapping your gums with your brain disengaged? That's what I don't understand.. I can't imagine what kind of parental abuse someone has to go through in life to spend their days trying to draw negative attention on line all day long... I just don't get it. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/27/12 10:25 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 12/27/2012 10:02 AM, Meyer wrote: On 12/27/2012 9:48 AM, ESAD wrote: On 12/27/12 9:45 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Dec 27, 9:09 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article 728c3341-c7bc-43e3-8317-ed3b501300d7 @s6g2000pby.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 27, 2:17 am, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. I never even think about it unless it's in the news. You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. It's the nature of the gun nut. Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-violence.html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. More total insanity from Scotty!!! More lazy trolling from kevin!!! You think the craziness you post here is worth a response that takes any effort? What joy do you get from flapping your gums with your brain disengaged? That's what I don't understand.. I can't imagine what kind of parental abuse someone has to go through in life to spend their days trying to draw negative attention on line all day long... I just don't get it. You and your total asshole right-wing buddies here are the Champions of Negativity. And you, you're so off the wall, your buddies here play you just so they can see what crazy stuff you'll come up with next. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article , says...
On 12/27/2012 10:02 AM, Meyer wrote: On 12/27/2012 9:48 AM, ESAD wrote: On 12/27/12 9:45 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Dec 27, 9:09 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article 728c3341-c7bc-43e3-8317-ed3b501300d7 @s6g2000pby.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 27, 2:17 am, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. I never even think about it unless it's in the news. You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. It's the nature of the gun nut. Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-violence.html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. More total insanity from Scotty!!! More lazy trolling from kevin!!! You think the craziness you post here is worth a response that takes any effort? What joy do you get from flapping your gums with your brain disengaged? That's what I don't understand.. I can't imagine what kind of parental abuse someone has to go through in life to spend their days trying to draw negative attention on line all day long... I just don't get it. This from the guy who let his daughter watch as he typed stuff about sucking dicks.... |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
|
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
|
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
|
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/27/12 1:21 PM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 12:43:05 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:35:01 -0500, BAR wrote: Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! Do you think the attorney general of the United States is going to involve himself in a matter that falls strictly under the purview of the District of Columbia? I find it hard to believe you actually graduated from a public high school in Connecticut. Check the Residence Act of 1790. That was rendered moot when DC was given home rule in 1968. They are running their own city now. Personally I think we would all be better off if they ceded it back to Maryland, only keeping the Federal Triangle where the national monuments, capitol, white house and the majority of federal buildings lie. Trouble is, they'd make it part of PG County, and we know what that'd bring. No, john, we don't know. why don't you tell us? |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
|
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
|
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/27/12 2:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 12:52:19 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 12/27/12 12:43 PM, wrote: That was rendered moot when DC was given home rule in 1968. They are running their own city now. Personally I think we would all be better off if they ceded it back to Maryland, only keeping the Federal Triangle where the national monuments, capitol, white house and the majority of federal buildings lie. Statehood, with one voting u.s. rep and two u.s. senators. I don't believe the district has the critical mass to be a state. It may be a little more possible now that they are gentrifying downtown and shoving the poor people out past the beltway but you still have a revenue problem. If they did something like that the government would still want to carve out their patch. Ceding the commercial and privately owned areas to Maryland is a more reasonable option. They have the precedent with the Virginia bite out of the original diamond. Critical mass? You mean population? D.C. has about the same population as Alaska, Vermont, and North Dakota though, obviously, much smaller geographic area. D.C. doesn't want to be part of another state. It wants its own political clout and independence. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article ,
says... On 12/27/12 9:09 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , says... On 12/26/12 4:15 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/26/2012 2:07 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned NBC news' David Gregory is in some serious trouble because he asked the police if he could use a 30 round magazine and was told no they are illegal to poses in DC. Gregory did it anyway and is now facing the possibility of being arrested, convicted, fined and jailed. Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! Do you think the attorney general of the United States is going to involve himself in a matter that falls strictly under the purview of the District of Columbia? I find it hard to believe you actually graduated from a public high school in Connecticut. Check the Residence Act of 1790. That's not what was asked. The Residence Act? Hehehe. The alleged violation relating to the hi-cap mag is related to laws of the District of Columbia. The hi-cap mags are not illegal under federal law. Congress is in charge of DC. Nothing happens in DC that Congress doesn't like to have happen, except for the corruption in the mayor's office and the council. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/27/2012 5:18 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Dec 27, 2:17 am, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:45 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are virtually banned Did you read the article and note the facts given? Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC. I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article. What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list I've seen. Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent collateral. Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live. A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case. Not hard to figure out. Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage gun nuts. And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago? NRA tell you that? Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy. The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a mass shooter. So you only care about murder when it is white victims. I see. No you don't. Gun nuts don't see clearly. There have always been more gun deaths where there is poverty and gangs. More stabbings too. Violent death goes with that territory. I never grieved over Italian, Irish, German, Russian and Jew mobsters shooting and slicing each other up either. These guys are all gun nuts. Part of their "business." Mass murder is down around snake bite and below lightning as a likely cause of death. Gun deaths themselves are rare enough. I never even think about it unless it's in the news. You and krause probably dwell on it quite a bit. It's the nature of the gun nut. Comes from fondling guns, I suppose, and thinking about getting more firepower. Maybe like a fatty thinking about more pastry. Don't really know. BTW, the gun death map pretty much follows the Red state/Blue state pattern.http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-violence.html Folks living in cracker Republican-voting states have an increased chance of dying by gun. Funny, all these mass shootings lately in blue states like Oregon, CT, NY..... And the blues here are the only ones who seem to have a double standard and of course I have been subjected to harry fondling and racking his guns.... so as usual thump, you are full of ****... Of course, those slacker states produce more "I want mine and now it's gone" types than the "cracker red states". When little progressive bitches don't get it handed to them, they seem to resort to shooting things up. You talking to me...why? |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
|
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article ,
says... On 12/27/12 12:43 PM, wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:35:01 -0500, BAR wrote: Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! Do you think the attorney general of the United States is going to involve himself in a matter that falls strictly under the purview of the District of Columbia? I find it hard to believe you actually graduated from a public high school in Connecticut. Check the Residence Act of 1790. That was rendered moot when DC was given home rule in 1968. They are running their own city now. Personally I think we would all be better off if they ceded it back to Maryland, only keeping the Federal Triangle where the national monuments, capitol, white house and the majority of federal buildings lie. Statehood, with one voting u.s. rep and two u.s. senators. Cede the land back to Maryland like the ceded the land across the river back to Virginia. If the people in DC want to live in a state they can move to any state they want, there are 50 to choose from. |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/27/2012 7:42 PM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:35:01 -0500, BAR wrote: Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! Do you think the attorney general of the United States is going to involve himself in a matter that falls strictly under the purview of the District of Columbia? I find it hard to believe you actually graduated from a public high school in Connecticut. Check the Residence Act of 1790. That was rendered moot when DC was given home rule in 1968. They are running their own city now. Personally I think we would all be better off if they ceded it back to Maryland, only keeping the Federal Triangle where the national monuments, capitol, white house and the majority of federal buildings lie. That would make it much easier for the MoCo PoPo and the PGCo PoPo. They wouldn't have to have a DC PoPo riding with them in order to chase criminals across the DC line. Hey, hey, hey! Why you callin' them PoPo... krause says only dirtbags say that? LOL! |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/27/12 7:47 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 12/27/2012 7:42 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:35:01 -0500, BAR wrote: Do you really think Holder is gonna' let anybody do anything to a lib-activist? LOL! Do you think the attorney general of the United States is going to involve himself in a matter that falls strictly under the purview of the District of Columbia? I find it hard to believe you actually graduated from a public high school in Connecticut. Check the Residence Act of 1790. That was rendered moot when DC was given home rule in 1968. They are running their own city now. Personally I think we would all be better off if they ceded it back to Maryland, only keeping the Federal Triangle where the national monuments, capitol, white house and the majority of federal buildings lie. That would make it much easier for the MoCo PoPo and the PGCo PoPo. They wouldn't have to have a DC PoPo riding with them in order to chase criminals across the DC line. Hey, hey, hey! Why you callin' them PoPo... krause says only dirtbags say that? LOL! ....quod erat demonstrandum |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
On 12/28/12 12:11 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:54:21 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 12/27/12 2:41 PM, wrote: Critical mass? You mean population? D.C. has about the same population as Alaska, Vermont, and North Dakota though, obviously, much smaller geographic area. D.C. doesn't want to be part of another state. It wants its own political clout and independence. Alaska and North Dakota have natural resources and a real economy. DC just sucks on the government tit. The federal government is the only industry they have. A lot of that is moving north to the I-270 corridor. The biggest industry downtown is K street. (essentially legal bribery) So what? |
The right wing NRA types won't like this!!
In article ,
says... On 12/28/12 12:11 AM, wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:54:21 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 12/27/12 2:41 PM, wrote: Critical mass? You mean population? D.C. has about the same population as Alaska, Vermont, and North Dakota though, obviously, much smaller geographic area. D.C. doesn't want to be part of another state. It wants its own political clout and independence. Alaska and North Dakota have natural resources and a real economy. DC just sucks on the government tit. The federal government is the only industry they have. A lot of that is moving north to the I-270 corridor. The biggest industry downtown is K street. (essentially legal bribery) So what? What does DC have to offer the US in the form of revenue and expansion? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com