Scarborough gets it right
 

On 12/21/12 9:44 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:56:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/20/12 2:57 PM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:16:29 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:01:37 -0500, ESAD wrote:

BTW - Springfield Mall is almost dead. Most of the stores have closed. Macy's, Penny's, and Target
are still open. Do you blame that on the Latino population north of the mall? Are the Latinos, in
your opinion, all bad? You call others racist. You're sick.


I've several times mentioned MS-13 was active in your immediate area. I
never said or implied that all Latinos were gang members. Springfield
Mall has been dying for a decade, and a big reason is MS-13 gang activity.

Maybe one day while you are out on your clapped out old motorcycle,
you'll encounter a few MS-13 members, who will take your bike away from
you.

The worst elements of DC have moved out to the beltway and beyond
because real estate values inside DC have priced them out of the
market.
PG and Arlington County used to be "Leave it to Beaver" land. PG has
become a combat zone and I understand it is not much better on the
other side of the bridge.

Oh yes it is! You're right about PG county though. That place is a definite mess. Don't know what
the problem is. ESAD lives pretty close. Maybe he can explain why PG County is the war zone it is.


Actually, **** for brains, you live a lot closer to PG County than I do.
What do you think is on the other side of that fancy new bridge that
crosses the Potomac from Alexandria? PG County. PG County is, what,
about six miles from your house. We're not nearly that close.

Besides, while PG County has some bad spots, it is a mostly rural county
with some nice areas, and not nearly as congested as Fairfax County,
Virginia, where you live and especially your part of that county, which
has bumper to bumper traffic on its roads from 5 am to 7 pm weekdays.

When we frequented your neighborhood, we saw drug deals going down at
least once a week in that Safeway parking lot you can walk to in 15
minutes from your house at the same time the county mounties were
looking for cars with expired county stickers in townhouse parking lots.

Hell, the best thing in your 'hood, the Greek diner at the bottom of Van
Dorn is gone, replaced by another bank.




ESAD! Have you been stalking my neighborhood again? Were you looking for the Guzzi? It was probably
out in my Maryland-red barn out back - the one with the twin Volvo diesels inside.

What a joke.


Not interested in non-historic old motorcycles. We're in your area about
twice a year. There's a decent Chinese restaurant a couple of blocks
from your house on the way to Springfield Mall, our dentist is in
Annandale, and we also frequent a few Vietnamese restaurants on your
side of the Potomac. We were at the Four Sisters last week.

Scarborough gets it right
 

On 12/21/12 9:46 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:18:35 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:56:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:

Besides, while PG County has some bad spots, it is a mostly rural county

Huh?

It was rural when I was there but it is very built up now. I doubt you
could find a safe place to hunt anywhere in PG.
We used to shoot quail just South west of 210 and Oxon Hill Rd and we
would hunt ducks down there on the river where that new metroplex is
now.

I am also amazed at how built up Chuck County was the last time I was
up there (July)
When you get down south of Leonardtown it starts looking familiar but
there are still a lot of new houses.

You can't get much further south than Leonardtown.

We go a little further south to the Navy rec center by Solomon's Island. Great place for camping.
We've been taking the kids and grandkids there for a week+ the past couple years.


Leonardtown is SW of the Navy Rec Center. No wonder we lost the war
against Vietnam, with soldiers like you who couldn't read a map.

Scarborough gets it right
 

On 12/21/12 9:55 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:51:58 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

I am the one who suggested in another group that
Tim McVeigh probably spent less on diesel and fertilizer than this guys
mom spent on the four weapons he brought to the school.

Everyone forgets the chunk of C-4 McVeigh used as a detonator,
although I imagine he stole that from the Army.



What? You can't buy C4 on ebay? I'm shocked.

Scarborough gets it right
 

On 12/21/2012 6:38 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:40:27 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 12/20/2012 11:54 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:25:08 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 12/19/2012 12:49 PM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:33:35 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 12/18/2012 12:21 PM, GuzzisRule wrote:

Fine - do away with 'military style...combat assault rifles with high capacity (not defined)
magazines'. How the hell would that stop someone who wanted to kill twenty kids? It might make him a
little slower, but not much!

Yeah, lets make it as easy as possible.

That was kind of a stupid reply. C-4 would make it *very* easy. In fact, I'm wondering why some
jihadist hasn't strapped a bomb to her chest and walked into a school cafeteria during lunchtime.

Yeah, it wasn't the time for sarcasm. You got my point though.

If the goal is to make the killing of 20 kids take 10 seconds longer, then it's a stupid goal! Do
you get the point?


Look who's being stupid... the goal is to make the potential killing of
20 kids result in less than 20 dead kids. The fewer the better. I
don't buy your assertions.

I'd much rather find a solution that would prevent the killing of all twenty, not just allow the
killing of 19.

I guess that's a hard one.


It is. I don't think it's effective to hold out for perfection. It
seems like an excuse to do nothing. I'll take improvement.

Scarborough gets it right
 

On 12/21/2012 11:30 AM, thumper wrote:
On 12/21/2012 6:38 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:40:27 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 12/20/2012 11:54 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:25:08 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 12/19/2012 12:49 PM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:33:35 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 12/18/2012 12:21 PM, GuzzisRule wrote:

Fine - do away with 'military style...combat assault rifles with
high capacity (not defined)
magazines'. How the hell would that stop someone who wanted to
kill twenty kids? It might make him a
little slower, but not much!

Yeah, lets make it as easy as possible.

That was kind of a stupid reply. C-4 would make it *very* easy. In
fact, I'm wondering why some
jihadist hasn't strapped a bomb to her chest and walked into a
school cafeteria during lunchtime.

Yeah, it wasn't the time for sarcasm. You got my point though.

If the goal is to make the killing of 20 kids take 10 seconds
longer, then it's a stupid goal! Do
you get the point?


Look who's being stupid... the goal is to make the potential killing of
20 kids result in less than 20 dead kids. The fewer the better. I
don't buy your assertions.

I'd much rather find a solution that would prevent the killing of all
twenty, not just allow the
killing of 19.

I guess that's a hard one.


It is. I don't think it's effective to hold out for perfection.

And it's all politics on both sides of the argument...

seems like an excuse to do nothing. I'll take improvement.

Scarborough gets it right
 

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:26:00 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

The California Legislature was Democrat. The bill was a California bill.
Just set the model for the rest of the states.

California doesn't define the United States.

In a lot of things it does.

Well, no.

Scarborough gets it right
 

In article , says...

On 12/21/2012 11:30 AM, thumper wrote:
On 12/21/2012 6:38 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:40:27 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 12/20/2012 11:54 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:25:08 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 12/19/2012 12:49 PM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:33:35 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 12/18/2012 12:21 PM, GuzzisRule wrote:

Fine - do away with 'military style...combat assault rifles with
high capacity (not defined)
magazines'. How the hell would that stop someone who wanted to
kill twenty kids? It might make him a
little slower, but not much!

Yeah, lets make it as easy as possible.

That was kind of a stupid reply. C-4 would make it *very* easy. In
fact, I'm wondering why some
jihadist hasn't strapped a bomb to her chest and walked into a
school cafeteria during lunchtime.

Yeah, it wasn't the time for sarcasm. You got my point though.

If the goal is to make the killing of 20 kids take 10 seconds
longer, then it's a stupid goal! Do
you get the point?


Look who's being stupid... the goal is to make the potential killing of
20 kids result in less than 20 dead kids. The fewer the better. I
don't buy your assertions.

I'd much rather find a solution that would prevent the killing of all
twenty, not just allow the
killing of 19.

I guess that's a hard one.


It is. I don't think it's effective to hold out for perfection.

And it's all politics on both sides of the argument...

seems like an excuse to do nothing. I'll take improvement.

It's "politics" to not want innocent children dying?? You ARE a ****ing
moron.

Scarborough gets it right
 

On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:55:36 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/21/12 9:41 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:36:12 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:16:29 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:01:37 -0500, ESAD wrote:

BTW - Springfield Mall is almost dead. Most of the stores have closed. Macy's, Penny's, and Target
are still open. Do you blame that on the Latino population north of the mall? Are the Latinos, in
your opinion, all bad? You call others racist. You're sick.


I've several times mentioned MS-13 was active in your immediate area. I
never said or implied that all Latinos were gang members. Springfield
Mall has been dying for a decade, and a big reason is MS-13 gang activity.

Maybe one day while you are out on your clapped out old motorcycle,
you'll encounter a few MS-13 members, who will take your bike away from
you.

The worst elements of DC have moved out to the beltway and beyond
because real estate values inside DC have priced them out of the
market.
PG and Arlington County used to be "Leave it to Beaver" land. PG has
become a combat zone and I understand it is not much better on the
other side of the bridge.

Oh yes it is! You're right about PG county though. That place is a definite mess. Don't know what
the problem is. ESAD lives pretty close. Maybe he can explain why PG County is the war zone it is.

PG and DC have one thing in common. They are filled with people who
believe that when the get elected or appointed to office that it is
their duty to extract as much cash from the public, as possible, to pad
their own pockets.

DC has lost a couple of councilmen to jail recently and we have Mr. and
Mrs. Jack Johnson in PG to show is that crime families. Jack Johnson's
famous line is "pub the money in your underwear and walk out of the
house." Almost as good as Mayor Marion "Mayor for Live" Barry who gave
us the often used statement "the bitch set me up."

If you want to move on to the appointed members of government we can go
there.


What can I say? All of that is certainly true. DC undertook a noble action when it fired a large
number of totally worthless teachers. But, we then got a new administration - which promptly rehired
the pieces of ****.

Oh well, best to start the problems at an early age.

I note that ESAD never addresses the gangs in DC and PG County. It's always the Latinos elsewhere.



I don't live in the District of Columbia or Prince Georges County, and
you live a lot closer to the District and PG County than I do. But,
heck, you've got MS-13 right close to you...no need to drive across
state lines or into another county.

We did have a meth lab in operation about five years ago about 10 miles
away. The sheriff closed it down and the rumors are the sheriff informed
its operators they had a couple of hours to leave the county or they'd
all be shot dead in an even bigger raid. But I think the operators of
the lab were white trash like you, not minorities.

You don't live here either, but you've got a mouth full of negative comments about the Latinos in
the area.

Your comments, ESAD, would be considered racist by krause or Kevin.

Scarborough gets it right
 

On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:01:53 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/21/12 9:46 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:18:35 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:56:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:

Besides, while PG County has some bad spots, it is a mostly rural county

Huh?

It was rural when I was there but it is very built up now. I doubt you
could find a safe place to hunt anywhere in PG.
We used to shoot quail just South west of 210 and Oxon Hill Rd and we
would hunt ducks down there on the river where that new metroplex is
now.

I am also amazed at how built up Chuck County was the last time I was
up there (July)
When you get down south of Leonardtown it starts looking familiar but
there are still a lot of new houses.

You can't get much further south than Leonardtown.

We go a little further south to the Navy rec center by Solomon's Island. Great place for camping.
We've been taking the kids and grandkids there for a week+ the past couple years.


Leonardtown is SW of the Navy Rec Center. No wonder we lost the war
against Vietnam, with soldiers like you who couldn't read a map.

Well I'll be damned. You're not telling another lie!

My bad, I was thinking of St. Leonard.

Scarborough gets it right
 

On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:50:28 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On 12/21/2012 11:30 AM, thumper wrote:
On 12/21/2012 6:38 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:40:27 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 12/20/2012 11:54 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:25:08 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 12/19/2012 12:49 PM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:33:35 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 12/18/2012 12:21 PM, GuzzisRule wrote:

Fine - do away with 'military style...combat assault rifles with
high capacity (not defined)
magazines'. How the hell would that stop someone who wanted to
kill twenty kids? It might make him a
little slower, but not much!

Yeah, lets make it as easy as possible.

That was kind of a stupid reply. C-4 would make it *very* easy. In
fact, I'm wondering why some
jihadist hasn't strapped a bomb to her chest and walked into a
school cafeteria during lunchtime.

Yeah, it wasn't the time for sarcasm. You got my point though.

If the goal is to make the killing of 20 kids take 10 seconds
longer, then it's a stupid goal! Do
you get the point?


Look who's being stupid... the goal is to make the potential killing of
20 kids result in less than 20 dead kids. The fewer the better. I
don't buy your assertions.

I'd much rather find a solution that would prevent the killing of all
twenty, not just allow the
killing of 19.

I guess that's a hard one.


It is. I don't think it's effective to hold out for perfection.

And it's all politics on both sides of the argument...

seems like an excuse to do nothing. I'll take improvement.

It's "politics" to not want innocent children dying?? You ARE a ****ing
moron.

Agreed, Kevin.