![]() |
Snickering Snotty
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:04:53 -0500, ESAD wrote:
On 12/17/12 3:52 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:42:02 -0500, ESAD wrote: the availability of psychological counseling to all who need it, whether they know it or not. === Just on the off chance that you are "one who doesn't know it", you should run right out to the nearest counseling center. **** off, w'hine. That's all you get. === Harry, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but everything I know about you spells emotional train wreck. You are in denial - no joke - and there is ample evidence to support that conclusion. No mature, stable individual behaves in the manner that you do. |
Snickering Snotty
On 12/17/12 5:13 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:04:53 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 12/17/12 3:52 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:42:02 -0500, ESAD wrote: the availability of psychological counseling to all who need it, whether they know it or not. === Just on the off chance that you are "one who doesn't know it", you should run right out to the nearest counseling center. **** off, w'hine. That's all you get. === Harry, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but everything I know about you spells emotional train wreck. You are in denial - no joke - and there is ample evidence to support that conclusion. No mature, stable individual behaves in the manner that you do. W'hine, I don't give a **** what you think or, even, whether you live or die. Save your energy for your fellow righties and reach-around partners: Meyer, Earl, Robbins, Herring, NoPoonTang and, of course, Snotty Scotty. And, of course, "**** off, W'hine." Have nice day. |
Snickering Snotty
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:04:51 -0500, ESAD wrote:
On 12/17/12 5:13 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:04:53 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 12/17/12 3:52 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:42:02 -0500, ESAD wrote: the availability of psychological counseling to all who need it, whether they know it or not. === Just on the off chance that you are "one who doesn't know it", you should run right out to the nearest counseling center. **** off, w'hine. That's all you get. === Harry, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but everything I know about you spells emotional train wreck. You are in denial - no joke - and there is ample evidence to support that conclusion. No mature, stable individual behaves in the manner that you do. W'hine, I don't give a **** what you think or, even, whether you live or die. Save your energy for your fellow righties and reach-around partners: Meyer, Earl, Robbins, Herring, NoPoonTang and, of course, Snotty Scotty. And, of course, "**** off, W'hine." Have nice day. ======== Q.E.D. I rest my case. |
Snickering Snotty
On 12/17/12 6:40 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:04:51 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 12/17/12 5:13 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:04:53 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 12/17/12 3:52 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:42:02 -0500, ESAD wrote: the availability of psychological counseling to all who need it, whether they know it or not. === Just on the off chance that you are "one who doesn't know it", you should run right out to the nearest counseling center. **** off, w'hine. That's all you get. === Harry, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but everything I know about you spells emotional train wreck. You are in denial - no joke - and there is ample evidence to support that conclusion. No mature, stable individual behaves in the manner that you do. W'hine, I don't give a **** what you think or, even, whether you live or die. Save your energy for your fellow righties and reach-around partners: Meyer, Earl, Robbins, Herring, NoPoonTang and, of course, Snotty Scotty. And, of course, "**** off, W'hine." Have nice day. ======== Q.E.D. I rest my case. No, you haven't. |
Snickering Snotty
On Monday, December 17, 2012 5:13:34 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote:
=== Harry, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but everything I know about you spells emotional train wreck. You are in denial - no joke - and there is ample evidence to support that conclusion. No mature, stable individual behaves in the manner that you do. That's a keeper. Pegged to the wall, krause is. : |
Snickering Snotty
ESAD wrote:
On 12/17/12 5:13 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:04:53 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 12/17/12 3:52 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:42:02 -0500, ESAD wrote: the availability of psychological counseling to all who need it, whether they know it or not. === Just on the off chance that you are "one who doesn't know it", you should run right out to the nearest counseling center. **** off, w'hine. That's all you get. === Harry, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but everything I know about you spells emotional train wreck. You are in denial - no joke - and there is ample evidence to support that conclusion. No mature, stable individual behaves in the manner that you do. W'hine, I don't give a **** what you think or, even, whether you live or die. Save your energy for your fellow righties and reach-around partners: Meyer, Earl, Robbins, Herring, NoPoonTang and, of course, Snotty Scotty. And, of course, "**** off, W'hine." Have nice day. Proof the tax cheat *does* read every post. |
Snickering Snotty
|
Snickering Snotty
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:42:02 -0500, ESAD wrote:
On 12/17/12 8:52 AM, Tim wrote: On Dec 17, 7:47 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:39:01 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 15, 1:26 pm, jps wrote: And just what does that tell you about the difference between our two societies and American's ability to handle weapons responsibly? Not much. Nothing is a 'weapon' until it's turned into one, regardless of if it's a gun, knife, claw hammer, axe, box opener... We are a nation of desperate people, And why is that? Think making guns real available is a good idea? No. I obtained mine legally and maintain and use them in accordance with State and Federal laws. If that's not suitable for you then by all means get out of the dump and run for high office. Then do what you can to change the law. Every one of the weapons used in high casualty incidents were obtained legally. That's the problem, someone obtains them legally, then someone either "borrows" them or steals them to commit crimes and kill innocent people and children. Yep! "Every one of the weapons used in high casualty incidents were obtained legally." Then used by criminal[s] in a highly illegal manner. I don't know what may happen because of the latest massacre. I hope the following happens: 1. Long-term, strong efforts to amend the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution to make it as "difficult" to obtain a firearm as it is to obtain and register a motor vehicle: no purchases, sales or transfers without a paper trail and a background check. Include absolute, defined restrictions on certain types of weapons and ancillary products that typically are not used for hunting, target shooting or home defense. These would make it illegal to possess certain types of firearms and ancillary equipment. Illegal to possess would mean these firearms would have to be turned in and destroyed, and the owner would receive a fee for the turn-in. Gosh, maybe they should do the same thing for voting. I believe any illegal alien can buy a car and register it. Or, he can pay a 'legal' alien to do it for him. 2. Short-term, an end to the gun show loophole, and no purchases, sales or transfers of any firearms without a paper trail and background check. No sales of firearms that can or can be modified to handle a magazine or clip that holds more than 10 rounds. No sales of such magazines or clips. Turn-ins of such magazines or clips. No purchases, transfers or sales of firearms without a waiting period. So, if you want to kill twenty kids, you must know how to change magazines or clips. Really smart idea, krause. 3. An immediate increase in the amount of funding available for psychological screening and testing in all schools, and in the availability of psychological counseling to all who need it, whether they know it or not. **** a bunch of privacy! If a kid looks at you with 'that tone of voice' he/she is sent to a shrink (like the Dr. Dr. Dr.??) for immediate screening, testing, and incarceration if the 'shrink' deems it warranted. Go pay your f'ing taxes krause. You've reached your wit's end. - More truth from 'Racist John' |
Snickering Snotty
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:40:11 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:04:51 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 12/17/12 5:13 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:04:53 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 12/17/12 3:52 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:42:02 -0500, ESAD wrote: the availability of psychological counseling to all who need it, whether they know it or not. === Just on the off chance that you are "one who doesn't know it", you should run right out to the nearest counseling center. **** off, w'hine. That's all you get. === Harry, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but everything I know about you spells emotional train wreck. You are in denial - no joke - and there is ample evidence to support that conclusion. No mature, stable individual behaves in the manner that you do. W'hine, I don't give a **** what you think or, even, whether you live or die. Save your energy for your fellow righties and reach-around partners: Meyer, Earl, Robbins, Herring, NoPoonTang and, of course, Snotty Scotty. And, of course, "**** off, W'hine." Have nice day. ======== Q.E.D. I rest my case. LMAO!! But, you shouldn't partake in such simple pleasure. I'm disappointed in you. Choose a more worthy opponent, like Kevin. |
Snickering Snotty
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:43:39 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message .. . Some questions have no easy answers. In China there have been a series of mass killings of children using knives. What is the psychological appeal to killing a room full of children? How do we make the schools safe short of posting an armed guard in every class room? How do we detect and isolate the mentally disturbed amongst us who are capable of such acts, without giving up our basic freedoms? Has something changed in our society which inspired these crimes - media, culture, video games, etc. ? Like I said, some questions have no easy answers. --------------------------------------------------------- So true. Like most I am sure, I was horrified and deeply saddened by the events of last Friday in Connecticut. The shear insanity of this 20 year old's actions are unfathomable. Also like most, I have watched and listened to the 24 hour a day coverage of the horrific event, mostly on cable news channels (MSNBC and CNN) and on the Internet. I was angry, sad, frustrated and depressed, depending on what specific aspect of the events were being discussed and/or analyzed. I tried to remember what our society was like back when I was a youngster. I came into this world in 1949. I found a website that provides (for a fee) statistical information on virtually any subject you are interested in. Since these mass murders seem to always involve someone who ultimately takes their own life as well, I searched for: number of suicides in USA since 1950 and the number of homicides in the USA since 1950. I fully expected to see an upward trend in these categories over the decades since 1950. To my surprise, there was not an upward trend. The data was presented in terms of male and female suicides and homicides per 100,000 in the overall population. Firearms were involved in the majority for both categories, but at the same relative level (percentage) for each decade. The number of suicides and homicides committed per 100,000 in 1950 and then for every decade since was about the same as those today, give or take a handful. Furthermore, the numbers were actually considerably higher than today for both categories in the 1980 - 1990 decades. I've heard arguments that lay blame on violent, gory video games, easy access to guns, drugs, poor parenting, mental health, etc. I am sure all have some level of contribution to violent crime and steps should be taken to address them. (Having just gone through the permitting process in Massachusetts for a firearm permit, I am completely in favor of the overall tightening of gun control laws and the banning of military type assault rifles. Massachusetts has one of, if not *the* most restrictive gun laws of all the States in the USA but I was still amazed at how easy it is to get a permit with very little training.) My conclusion is that no suicide or homicide is justified or acceptable in a society however the numbers are *not* increasing, contrary to what we may be led to believe or assume. From 1950 to the 1970/1980 decades we didn't really have the media information available to us that exists today. MSNBC and CNN have had 24 hour a day coverage of the horrible events since last Friday. Yahoo News on the Internet reports every shooting that takes place anywhere in the country, 15 minutes after it happens. (there's a new one today in Texas, involving one person). I am not attempting to trivialize or minimize the horrible events of Friday or of the mass killings that have occurred in the past few years. But statistics indicate that this is *not* a growing epidemic or upward trend. There were unfortunately more that occurred in the 1980's and 1990's. We just didn't hear as much about them as we hear today. I've also heard similar statistics presented on one of our local radio stations. The statistics make us look better. However, I'd have no problem with the banning of assault weapons. Target practice and hunting can both be done with other types of rifles. The question will then be, "What constitutes an assault weapon?" Here is a rifle, but is it an assault weapon? http://www.basspro.com/Ruger-Mini14-...duct/10218139/ It looks to me like it would be a nice varmint or small game hunting rifle. But, what if I add these: http://andean-inc.com/Merchant5/grap...1/MA1430_s.jpg They a Promag Industries' .223 caliber, 30 round magazine for Ruger Mini-14 and Ranch Rifles. Or what if I just become very proficient at changing magazines? It might add a whole two seconds to the time it takes me to fire twenty rounds from 10-round magazines. I wouldn't mind the banning of assault style weapons simply because it would make some of the anti-gun crowd happy - until the same thing happens again with a 'normal' looking rifle, or a 'normal' looking pistol. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com