|
Bob Costas speaks the truth
|
Bob Costas speaks the truth
Is skipping that wedding something Jesus would want you to do? Do you understand that just asking that question itself shows how ignorant you are about the subject.. Sorry, I just don't care enough to tell you why... Guess I am a bad Christian:)... ----------------------------------- You seem to be the hate filled asshole. Herring has his views, and as long as he does not force them on others, that is OK. If you do not like the idea of a gay partnership, then it is ok to pass on the ceremony. Same as passing on most others ideas that are abhorrent to oneself. I don't care who people marry or what color people are or their country of origin. Unless they are Black Muslims, Korean dentists and others. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
ESAD wrote:
On 12/8/12 3:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/8/2012 3:04 PM, Califbill wrote: "ESAD" wrote in message m... On 12/7/12 11:24 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/7/2012 10:24 PM, thumper wrote: On 12/7/2012 2:42 PM, Califbill wrote: "ESAD" wrote On 12/6/12 4:42 PM, JustWait wrote: Atheists are bullying Christians all over the country. Putting up nasty posters to mock and just kill Christian freedom of speech at Nativities and such, even going as far as taking the word God from a 6 year olds poem to her granny at a school function, and getting "A Charlie Brown Christmas" banned... This is just intolerance and hate, nothing else... That's yet another crock of crap. Atheists are not bullying anyone. You want a Nativity scene? Fine. Put it up on your front lawn or on your church's lawn, but not on the lawn of a public school or in a public park. There is no place for religious functions or displays in the public schools. Note, however, there is little objection to public college courses teaching "comparative religions," so long as the teaching isn't favoring one religion over another. It is intolerant to force your religious views onto the public schools or onto public facilities. ---------------------------- Those public facilities belong to the religious as well as to the Atheists. And that doesn't entitle either to state sponsorship. Do it on your own. So what does putting up a Christmas Tree, or Playing A Charlie Brown Christmas have to do with State Sponsorship? Nothing, nothing at all... It does if the tree is put up on public property, idiot. ---------------------- Only if put up by the government and paid for by the government. And only one religious viewpoint allowed. They couldn't show where the Constitution said "freedom from religion", so now they are on to the next red herring. Fact is, they hate anybody who doesn't devolve to their own selfish lifestyle, and are willing to do anything to avoid facing the fact that they just selfish haters... Neither of you have any understanding of the Constitution. Not a whit of understanding. Actually you seem to have little sense of anything meaningful. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
ESAD wrote:
On 12/8/12 3:00 PM, Califbill wrote: "ESAD" wrote in message ... On 12/7/12 5:42 PM, Califbill wrote: "ESAD" wrote in message m... On 12/6/12 4:42 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/6/2012 4:30 PM, Califbill wrote: GuzzisRule wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:55:36 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:03:07 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. ==== Judging from that article I'd have to say that the author, and probably you, share some confusion about the difference between values, religious beliefs and political beliefs. Sometimes reasonable people with high values have to agree to disagree. More importantly, it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others and then accuse them of lacking "values". Other than, possibly, the first one, there is nothing religious there. I don't consider the first one a religious position. 'Marriage' was an institution that had some meaning. Now liberals, especially, have made it a sham. And, I agree that 'it is 'it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others', and that includes atheists imposing theirs. If you can't read that and determine what 'values' are being discussed, then I can understand your comments. Religious beliefs are fine. Just do not force them on others, but likewise, others should not infringe your religious freedoms. And marriage has been different things through the years. Lots of the profits in the bible had multiple wives. In the 1800's you could marry multiple spouses in Texas, Alabama and another regions also. And not even have to be Mormon. Texas about we're married if you announced it in front of 20 witness's or signed in to a hotel as Mr. And Mrs. No church or state involved. It is supposed to be a free country. You want to marry same sex? Go for it. Just do not require the rest of unto pay for your lifestyle. Same goes for most drugs, do them, die if that happens, but do not expect society to pay for your medical bills. Atheists are bullying Christians all over the country. Putting up nasty posters to mock and just kill Christian freedom of speech at Nativities and such, even going as far as taking the word God from a 6 year olds poem to her granny at a school function, and getting "A Charlie Brown Christmas" banned... This is just intolerance and hate, nothing else... That's yet another crock of crap. Atheists are not bullying anyone. You want a Nativity scene? Fine. Put it up on your front lawn or on your church's lawn, but not on the lawn of a public school or in a public park. There is no place for religious functions or displays in the public schools. Note, however, there is little objection to public college courses teaching "comparative religions," so long as the teaching isn't favoring one religion over another. It is intolerant to force your religious views onto the public schools or onto public facilities. ---------------------------- Those public facilities belong to the religious as well as to the Atheists. Actually, they belong to the people, and the Establishment Clause in the Constitution and Supreme Court rulings since say you cannot use the public schools or facilities to push religious beliefs. -------------------- The Establishment Clause in the Constitution says there will not be a state religion. Nothing about not using public facilities. Please. Save your interpretations for Herring, Snotty, and the rest of the charlatan believers. Non Christian's also use public facilities. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
ESAD wrote:
On 12/8/12 2:50 PM, Califbill wrote: "ESAD" wrote in message m... On 12/8/12 8:39 AM, GuzzisRule wrote: On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 14:40:34 -0800, "Califbill" wrote: "Califbill" wrote in message ... GuzzisRule wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:55:36 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:03:07 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. ==== Judging from that article I'd have to say that the author, and probably you, share some confusion about the difference between values, religious beliefs and political beliefs. Sometimes reasonable people with high values have to agree to disagree. More importantly, it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others and then accuse them of lacking "values". Other than, possibly, the first one, there is nothing religious there. I don't consider the first one a religious position. 'Marriage' was an institution that had some meaning. Now liberals, especially, have made it a sham. And, I agree that 'it is 'it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others', and that includes atheists imposing theirs. If you can't read that and determine what 'values' are being discussed, then I can understand your comments. Religious beliefs are fine. Just do not force them on others, but likewise, others should not infringe your religious freedoms. And marriage has been different things through the years. Lots of the profits in the bible had multiple wives. In the 1800's you could marry multiple spouses in Texas, Alabama and another regions also. And not even have to be Mormon. Texas about we're married if you announced it in front of 20 witness's or signed in to a hotel as Mr. And Mrs. No church or state involved. It is supposed to be a free country. You want to marry same sex? Go for it. Just do not require the rest of unto pay for your lifestyle. Same goes for most drugs, do them, die if that happens, but do not expect society to pay for your medical bills. ----------------- dang Ipad and the spelling corrections. You've referred several times to differences in the number of wives. Not a lot of instances in the bible of male prophets marrying other males, goats, or whatever. Ditto with Texas, Alabama, and other regions. I have a gay niece living with her girlfriend. They will probably invite me to a 'wedding' soon. I won't attend because I think the 'ceremony' is a sham. Obviously you will be a hate-filled asshole until the day you die, and probably thereafter. Is skipping that wedding something Jesus would want you to do? ----------------------------------- You seem to be the hate filled asshole. Herring has his views, and as long as he does not force them on others, that is OK. If you do not like the idea of a gay partnership, then it is ok to pass on the ceremony. Same as passing on most others ideas that are abhorrent to oneself. I don't care who people marry or what color people are or their country of origin. Actually you always preach hate at people who come from a country or state you seem to dislike. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On 12/8/12 8:48 PM, Califbill wrote:
ESAD wrote: On 12/8/12 3:00 PM, Califbill wrote: "ESAD" wrote in message ... On 12/7/12 5:42 PM, Califbill wrote: "ESAD" wrote in message m... On 12/6/12 4:42 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/6/2012 4:30 PM, Califbill wrote: GuzzisRule wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:55:36 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:03:07 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. ==== Judging from that article I'd have to say that the author, and probably you, share some confusion about the difference between values, religious beliefs and political beliefs. Sometimes reasonable people with high values have to agree to disagree. More importantly, it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others and then accuse them of lacking "values". Other than, possibly, the first one, there is nothing religious there. I don't consider the first one a religious position. 'Marriage' was an institution that had some meaning. Now liberals, especially, have made it a sham. And, I agree that 'it is 'it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others', and that includes atheists imposing theirs. If you can't read that and determine what 'values' are being discussed, then I can understand your comments. Religious beliefs are fine. Just do not force them on others, but likewise, others should not infringe your religious freedoms. And marriage has been different things through the years. Lots of the profits in the bible had multiple wives. In the 1800's you could marry multiple spouses in Texas, Alabama and another regions also. And not even have to be Mormon. Texas about we're married if you announced it in front of 20 witness's or signed in to a hotel as Mr. And Mrs. No church or state involved. It is supposed to be a free country. You want to marry same sex? Go for it. Just do not require the rest of unto pay for your lifestyle. Same goes for most drugs, do them, die if that happens, but do not expect society to pay for your medical bills. Atheists are bullying Christians all over the country. Putting up nasty posters to mock and just kill Christian freedom of speech at Nativities and such, even going as far as taking the word God from a 6 year olds poem to her granny at a school function, and getting "A Charlie Brown Christmas" banned... This is just intolerance and hate, nothing else... That's yet another crock of crap. Atheists are not bullying anyone. You want a Nativity scene? Fine. Put it up on your front lawn or on your church's lawn, but not on the lawn of a public school or in a public park. There is no place for religious functions or displays in the public schools. Note, however, there is little objection to public college courses teaching "comparative religions," so long as the teaching isn't favoring one religion over another. It is intolerant to force your religious views onto the public schools or onto public facilities. ---------------------------- Those public facilities belong to the religious as well as to the Atheists. Actually, they belong to the people, and the Establishment Clause in the Constitution and Supreme Court rulings since say you cannot use the public schools or facilities to push religious beliefs. -------------------- The Establishment Clause in the Constitution says there will not be a state religion. Nothing about not using public facilities. Please. Save your interpretations for Herring, Snotty, and the rest of the charlatan believers. Non Christian's also use public facilities. The objection is to using public facilities for religious purposes or to promote religion. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On 12/8/12 8:48 PM, Califbill wrote:
ESAD wrote: On 12/8/12 3:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/8/2012 3:04 PM, Califbill wrote: "ESAD" wrote in message m... On 12/7/12 11:24 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/7/2012 10:24 PM, thumper wrote: On 12/7/2012 2:42 PM, Califbill wrote: "ESAD" wrote On 12/6/12 4:42 PM, JustWait wrote: Atheists are bullying Christians all over the country. Putting up nasty posters to mock and just kill Christian freedom of speech at Nativities and such, even going as far as taking the word God from a 6 year olds poem to her granny at a school function, and getting "A Charlie Brown Christmas" banned... This is just intolerance and hate, nothing else... That's yet another crock of crap. Atheists are not bullying anyone. You want a Nativity scene? Fine. Put it up on your front lawn or on your church's lawn, but not on the lawn of a public school or in a public park. There is no place for religious functions or displays in the public schools. Note, however, there is little objection to public college courses teaching "comparative religions," so long as the teaching isn't favoring one religion over another. It is intolerant to force your religious views onto the public schools or onto public facilities. ---------------------------- Those public facilities belong to the religious as well as to the Atheists. And that doesn't entitle either to state sponsorship. Do it on your own. So what does putting up a Christmas Tree, or Playing A Charlie Brown Christmas have to do with State Sponsorship? Nothing, nothing at all... It does if the tree is put up on public property, idiot. ---------------------- Only if put up by the government and paid for by the government. And only one religious viewpoint allowed. They couldn't show where the Constitution said "freedom from religion", so now they are on to the next red herring. Fact is, they hate anybody who doesn't devolve to their own selfish lifestyle, and are willing to do anything to avoid facing the fact that they just selfish haters... Neither of you have any understanding of the Constitution. Not a whit of understanding. Actually you seem to have little sense of anything meaningful. It is meaningful to keep church and state separate. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On 12/8/2012 8:48 PM, Califbill wrote:
ESAD wrote: On 12/8/12 3:00 PM, Califbill wrote: "ESAD" wrote in message ... On 12/7/12 5:42 PM, Califbill wrote: "ESAD" wrote in message m... On 12/6/12 4:42 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/6/2012 4:30 PM, Califbill wrote: GuzzisRule wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:55:36 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:03:07 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. ==== Judging from that article I'd have to say that the author, and probably you, share some confusion about the difference between values, religious beliefs and political beliefs. Sometimes reasonable people with high values have to agree to disagree. More importantly, it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others and then accuse them of lacking "values". Other than, possibly, the first one, there is nothing religious there. I don't consider the first one a religious position. 'Marriage' was an institution that had some meaning. Now liberals, especially, have made it a sham. And, I agree that 'it is 'it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others', and that includes atheists imposing theirs. If you can't read that and determine what 'values' are being discussed, then I can understand your comments. Religious beliefs are fine. Just do not force them on others, but likewise, others should not infringe your religious freedoms. And marriage has been different things through the years. Lots of the profits in the bible had multiple wives. In the 1800's you could marry multiple spouses in Texas, Alabama and another regions also. And not even have to be Mormon. Texas about we're married if you announced it in front of 20 witness's or signed in to a hotel as Mr. And Mrs. No church or state involved. It is supposed to be a free country. You want to marry same sex? Go for it. Just do not require the rest of unto pay for your lifestyle. Same goes for most drugs, do them, die if that happens, but do not expect society to pay for your medical bills. Atheists are bullying Christians all over the country. Putting up nasty posters to mock and just kill Christian freedom of speech at Nativities and such, even going as far as taking the word God from a 6 year olds poem to her granny at a school function, and getting "A Charlie Brown Christmas" banned... This is just intolerance and hate, nothing else... That's yet another crock of crap. Atheists are not bullying anyone. You want a Nativity scene? Fine. Put it up on your front lawn or on your church's lawn, but not on the lawn of a public school or in a public park. There is no place for religious functions or displays in the public schools. Note, however, there is little objection to public college courses teaching "comparative religions," so long as the teaching isn't favoring one religion over another. It is intolerant to force your religious views onto the public schools or onto public facilities. ---------------------------- Those public facilities belong to the religious as well as to the Atheists. Actually, they belong to the people, and the Establishment Clause in the Constitution and Supreme Court rulings since say you cannot use the public schools or facilities to push religious beliefs. -------------------- The Establishment Clause in the Constitution says there will not be a state religion. Nothing about not using public facilities. Please. Save your interpretations for Herring, Snotty, and the rest of the charlatan believers. Better than you and your KKK brothers.... Non Christian's also use public facilities. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
BAR wrote:
In article , earl8131 @hotmail.com says... BAR wrote: In article , says... On 12/6/12 10:21 PM, JustWait wrote: On 12/6/2012 10:00 PM, thumper wrote: On 12/6/2012 1:30 PM, Califbill wrote: Atheists are using the court to enforce their beliefs. The door to door missionary is at least honest about their views, and you can just close the door in their face. They are using the courts to enforce the constitution. Show me where it says "freedom from religion"?? You have no understanding of the Constitution or the "separation" clause, so why should anyone bother to "show" you a thing. If we use your interpretation of the Constitution and the laws we may end up with a tax lien on our property or we may even be sued by the government for non-payment of taxes. You should put the deed in you wife's name if you are going to screw the government out of taxes you owe! That's a great idea isn't it Harry? He doesn't respond when he's called out as a ****ing deadbeat. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com