|
Bob Costas speaks the truth
|
Bob Costas speaks the truth
jps wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=B1ijkccD9_8 How about a speech about the thug culture? The guy kills the girl friend, who is the mother of his 3 year old daughter. Guns may make it easier, but that is not the reason for all the violence. Lack of values is the real problem. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:14:21 -0600, Califbill wrote:
jps wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=B1ijkccD9_8 How about a speech about the thug culture? The guy kills the girl friend, who is the mother of his 3 year old daughter. Guns may make it easier, but that is not the reason for all the violence. Lack of values is the real problem. Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'. |
Bob Costas trying to fit in...
On 12/4/2012 2:14 PM, Califbill wrote:
jps wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=B1ijkccD9_8 How about a speech about the thug culture? The guy kills the girl friend, who is the mother of his 3 year old daughter. Guns may make it easier, but that is not the reason for all the violence. Lack of values is the real problem. The guy (costas) was just looking for brownie points... |
Bob Costas trying to fit in...
On 12/4/12 5:15 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 12/4/2012 2:14 PM, Califbill wrote: jps wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=B1ijkccD9_8 How about a speech about the thug culture? The guy kills the girl friend, who is the mother of his 3 year old daughter. Guns may make it easier, but that is not the reason for all the violence. Lack of values is the real problem. The guy (costas) was just looking for brownie points... From who, moron? Costas is at the top of his game. From wiki: Costas has won eight National Sportcaster of the Year awards from the National Sportscasters and Sportswriters Association, and was inducted into that organization's Hall of Fame in 2012. He has also won four Sportscaster of the Year awards from the American Sportscasters Association, and nearly twenty Sports Emmy Awards for outstanding sports announcing. In 1999, Costas was a recipient of the Curt Gowdy Media Award from the Basketball Hall of Fame, which is awarded to members of the electronic and print media for outstanding contributions to the sport. In 2000, he won a TV Guide Award for Favorite Sportscaster. He was selected as the Dick Schaap Award for Outstanding Journalism recipient in 2004. In 2006, Costas was also awarded an honorary doctorate in humane letters from Loyola College in Maryland. In 2012, he was awarded the Walter Cronkite Award for Excellence in Journalism. He is an honorary trustee of Webster University, a private college located in Webster Groves, Missouri. He is a frequent supporter of the school, to include numerous radio commercials. Costas is also an honorary board member of the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation. |
Bob Costas trying to fit in...
On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:23:59 PM UTC-5, ESAD wrote:
Costas is at the top of his game. From wiki: Costas has won eight National Sportcaster of the Year awards... "game" was a very important word. Costas is a SPORTS announcer. Just like the hollywood liberal airheads, he can't tell **** from shineola when it comes to the real world. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule
wrote: Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'. === That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be mistaken for lack of values. |
Bob Costas trying to fit in...
In article , says...
On 12/4/2012 2:14 PM, Califbill wrote: jps wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=B1ijkccD9_8 How about a speech about the thug culture? The guy kills the girl friend, who is the mother of his 3 year old daughter. Guns may make it easier, but that is not the reason for all the violence. Lack of values is the real problem. The guy (costas) was just looking for brownie points... Because he was remorseful that a great athlete killed himself and his girlfriend??? Insanity!! |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
|
Bob Costas trying to fit in...
|
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:16:26 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'. === That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be mistaken for lack of values. I'm a bit dissapointed in you, Wayne. It's not just the "ultra conservative" media's eye that hold that view, it's rampant in the ultra liberal view as well. And is alive and well right here in this NG. |
Bob Costas trying to fit in...
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:39:37 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:23:59 PM UTC-5, ESAD wrote: Costas is at the top of his game. From wiki: Costas has won eight National Sportcaster of the Year awards... "game" was a very important word. Costas is a SPORTS announcer. Just like the hollywood liberal airheads, he can't tell **** from shineola when it comes to the real world. But Rush does, eh? I don't know. *You* listen to him, not me. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:16:26 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'. === That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be mistaken for lack of values. It's a shame that some of those value oriented liberals you know aren't in politics or on judicial benches (whoops, those are the same thing for liberals). I suppose the big difference lies in how we define 'values'. I would imagine that my definition would be much different than that of Krause, jps, Kevin, et al. This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On 12/5/12 11:03 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
I suppose the big difference lies in how we define 'values'. I would imagine that my definition would be much different than that of Krause, jps, Kevin, et al. How did those racist positions of you and your party work out for you in the last election? |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
|
Bob Costas trying to fit in...
In article ,
says... On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:39:37 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:23:59 PM UTC-5, ESAD wrote: Costas is at the top of his game. From wiki: Costas has won eight National Sportcaster of the Year awards... "game" was a very important word. Costas is a SPORTS announcer. Just like the hollywood liberal airheads, he can't tell **** from shineola when it comes to the real world. But Rush does, eh? I don't know. *You* listen to him, not me. That's odd, you sure use a lot of his very talking points. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
In article ,
says... On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:16:26 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'. === That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be mistaken for lack of values. It's a shame that some of those value oriented liberals you know aren't in politics or on judicial benches (whoops, those are the same thing for liberals). I suppose the big difference lies in how we define 'values'. I would imagine that my definition would be much different than that of Krause, jps, Kevin, et al. This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. A human couldn't possibly be more narrow minded than you. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On 12/5/12 11:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:16:26 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote: On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'. === That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be mistaken for lack of values. I'm a bit dissapointed in you, Wayne. It's not just the "ultra conservative" media's eye that hold that view, it's rampant in the ultra liberal view as well. And is alive and well right here in this NG. Cite? I'm not aware of any "ultra liberals" in this newsgroup, now or at any time in the past. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 1:17:02 PM UTC-5, ESAD wrote:
In article , says... On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:16:26 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote: On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'. === That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be mistaken for lack of values. I'm a bit dissapointed in you, Wayne. It's not just the "ultra conservative" media's eye that hold that view, it's rampant in the ultra liberal view as well. And is alive and well right here in this NG. I'm not aware of any "ultra liberals" in this newsgroup, now or at any time in the past. Not very self aware, are you? Nothing seems left when you're looking from the far left. But you may be right... many mainstream liberals also seem to hold that view. Have you paid your taxes and debts, deadbeat? |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On 12/5/12 1:29 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 1:17:02 PM UTC-5, ESAD wrote: In article , says... On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:16:26 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote: On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'. === That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be mistaken for lack of values. I'm a bit dissapointed in you, Wayne. It's not just the "ultra conservative" media's eye that hold that view, it's rampant in the ultra liberal view as well. And is alive and well right here in this NG. I'm not aware of any "ultra liberals" in this newsgroup, now or at any time in the past. Not very self aware, are you? Nothing seems left when you're looking from the far left. Everything seems to be far left when you are over on the far right, where you and your fellow aging white racist south carolinians live, eh? Perhaps you can join one of the many wingnut secessionist movements. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
In article ,
says... On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 1:17:02 PM UTC-5, ESAD wrote: In article , says... On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:16:26 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote: On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'. === That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be mistaken for lack of values. I'm a bit dissapointed in you, Wayne. It's not just the "ultra conservative" media's eye that hold that view, it's rampant in the ultra liberal view as well. And is alive and well right here in this NG. I'm not aware of any "ultra liberals" in this newsgroup, now or at any time in the past. Not very self aware, are you? Nothing seems left when you're looking from the far left. This is true! But you may be right... many mainstream liberals also seem to hold that view. What you think of as "mainstream" maybe, because you are so far right. Have you paid your taxes and debts, deadbeat? He never will. Once a deadbeat, always a deadbeat. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
In article ,
says... On 12/5/12 1:29 PM, wrote: On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 1:17:02 PM UTC-5, ESAD wrote: In article , says... On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:16:26 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote: On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'. === That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be mistaken for lack of values. I'm a bit dissapointed in you, Wayne. It's not just the "ultra conservative" media's eye that hold that view, it's rampant in the ultra liberal view as well. And is alive and well right here in this NG. I'm not aware of any "ultra liberals" in this newsgroup, now or at any time in the past. Not very self aware, are you? Nothing seems left when you're looking from the far left. Everything seems to be far left when you are over on the far right, where you and your fellow aging white racist south carolinians live, eh? Perhaps you can join one of the many wingnut secessionist movements. You didn't answer his questions about your outstanding tax debts, deadbeat. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On 12/5/2012 1:17 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 12/5/12 11:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:16:26 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote: On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'. === That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be mistaken for lack of values. I'm a bit dissapointed in you, Wayne. It's not just the "ultra conservative" media's eye that hold that view, it's rampant in the ultra liberal view as well. And is alive and well right here in this NG. Cite? I'm not aware of any "ultra liberals" in this newsgroup, now or at any time in the past. Are you aware of any tax cheats,liars, or draft dodgers? |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 1:58:16 PM UTC-5, Meyer wrote:
On 12/5/2012 1:17 PM, ESAD wrote: I'm not aware of any "ultra liberals" in this newsgroup, now or at any time in the past. Are you aware of any tax cheats,liars, or draft dodgers? You left out imaginary lobsta boat captains. ~snerk~ |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
In article om,
says... On 12/5/2012 1:17 PM, ESAD wrote: On 12/5/12 11:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:16:26 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote: On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'. === That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be mistaken for lack of values. I'm a bit dissapointed in you, Wayne. It's not just the "ultra conservative" media's eye that hold that view, it's rampant in the ultra liberal view as well. And is alive and well right here in this NG. Cite? I'm not aware of any "ultra liberals" in this newsgroup, now or at any time in the past. Are you aware of any tax cheats,liars, or draft dodgers? I am! Harry Krause for one! |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
|
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:03:07 -0500, GuzzisRule
wrote: This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. ==== Judging from that article I'd have to say that the author, and probably you, share some confusion about the difference between values, religious beliefs and political beliefs. Sometimes reasonable people with high values have to agree to disagree. More importantly, it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others and then accuse them of lacking "values". |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
In article ,
says... On 12/5/12 11:03 AM, GuzzisRule wrote: I suppose the big difference lies in how we define 'values'. I would imagine that my definition would be much different than that of Krause, jps, Kevin, et al. How did those racist positions of you and your party work out for you in the last election? We are about to see what happens, here in the USA, what happens when the equality of opportunity is substituted with equality of outcome. So far, around the world it hasn't worked out well. You could always hold up Cuba as an example and I respond that Cuba is in a time warp, they are still in the 1950's with respect to infrastructure and services. The Cubans don't need to view this page, they know all about it but, you should view it and understand its contents. http://gasengine.farmcollector.com/G...nding-Breaker- Point-Ignition-Systems.aspx |
Bob Costas trying to fit in...
In article ,
says... In article , says... On 12/4/2012 2:14 PM, Califbill wrote: jps wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=B1ijkccD9_8 How about a speech about the thug culture? The guy kills the girl friend, who is the mother of his 3 year old daughter. Guns may make it easier, but that is not the reason for all the violence. Lack of values is the real problem. The guy (costas) was just looking for brownie points... Because he was remorseful that a great athlete killed himself and his girlfriend??? Insanity!! Because a man murdered the mother of his child and went and said good bye to his boss before he took the cowards way out and blew his brains all over the place. Costas used the event to further his political agenda. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On 12/4/2012 5:16 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'. === That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be mistaken for lack of values. Well said. I'm tempted to expand on that but I'll refrain. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:55:36 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:03:07 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. ==== Judging from that article I'd have to say that the author, and probably you, share some confusion about the difference between values, religious beliefs and political beliefs. Sometimes reasonable people with high values have to agree to disagree. More importantly, it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others and then accuse them of lacking "values". Other than, possibly, the first one, there is nothing religious there. I don't consider the first one a religious position. 'Marriage' was an institution that had some meaning. Now liberals, especially, have made it a sham. And, I agree that 'it is 'it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others', and that includes atheists imposing theirs. If you can't read that and determine what 'values' are being discussed, then I can understand your comments. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On 12/6/12 7:46 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:55:36 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:03:07 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. ==== Judging from that article I'd have to say that the author, and probably you, share some confusion about the difference between values, religious beliefs and political beliefs. Sometimes reasonable people with high values have to agree to disagree. More importantly, it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others and then accuse them of lacking "values". Other than, possibly, the first one, there is nothing religious there. I don't consider the first one a religious position. 'Marriage' was an institution that had some meaning. Now liberals, especially, have made it a sham. And, I agree that 'it is 'it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others', and that includes atheists imposing theirs. If you can't read that and determine what 'values' are being discussed, then I can understand your comments. Funny post, really, and it shows how disconnected you are. Please explain how liberals have made marriage a sham and while you are at it, tell how atheists are "imposing" their beliefs. Atheists don't give a damn about your religious beliefs so long as you don't try to impose them on others. Atheists aren't imposing their beliefs on anyone...there are no door to door atheist. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On 12/6/2012 7:55 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 12/6/12 7:46 AM, GuzzisRule wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:55:36 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:03:07 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. ==== Judging from that article I'd have to say that the author, and probably you, share some confusion about the difference between values, religious beliefs and political beliefs. Sometimes reasonable people with high values have to agree to disagree. More importantly, it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others and then accuse them of lacking "values". Other than, possibly, the first one, there is nothing religious there. I don't consider the first one a religious position. 'Marriage' was an institution that had some meaning. Now liberals, especially, have made it a sham. And, I agree that 'it is 'it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others', and that includes atheists imposing theirs. If you can't read that and determine what 'values' are being discussed, then I can understand your comments. Funny post, really, and it shows how disconnected you are. Please explain how liberals have made marriage a sham and while you are at it, tell how atheists are "imposing" their beliefs. Atheists don't give a damn about your religious beliefs so long as you don't try to impose them on others. Atheists aren't imposing their beliefs on anyone...there are no door to door atheist Hey ESAD!......... ESAD |
Bob Costas trying to fit in...
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... On 12/4/2012 2:14 PM, Califbill wrote: jps wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=B1ijkccD9_8 How about a speech about the thug culture? The guy kills the girl friend, who is the mother of his 3 year old daughter. Guns may make it easier, but that is not the reason for all the violence. Lack of values is the real problem. The guy (costas) was just looking for brownie points... Because he was remorseful that a great athlete killed himself and his girlfriend??? Insanity!! Because a man murdered the mother of his child and went and said good bye to his boss before he took the cowards way out and blew his brains all over the place. Costas used the event to further his political agenda. As are you and the other right wing trash. Good Christians, eh? |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
In article ,
says... On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:55:36 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:03:07 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. ==== Judging from that article I'd have to say that the author, and probably you, share some confusion about the difference between values, religious beliefs and political beliefs. Sometimes reasonable people with high values have to agree to disagree. More importantly, it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others and then accuse them of lacking "values". Other than, possibly, the first one, there is nothing religious there. I don't consider the first one a religious position. 'Marriage' was an institution that had some meaning. Now liberals, especially, have made it a sham. And, I agree that 'it is 'it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others', and that includes atheists imposing theirs. If you can't read that and determine what 'values' are being discussed, then I can understand your comments. How have liberals made marriage a sham? |
Bob Costas trying to fit in...
On 12/6/12 9:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... On 12/4/2012 2:14 PM, Califbill wrote: jps wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=B1ijkccD9_8 How about a speech about the thug culture? The guy kills the girl friend, who is the mother of his 3 year old daughter. Guns may make it easier, but that is not the reason for all the violence. Lack of values is the real problem. The guy (costas) was just looking for brownie points... Because he was remorseful that a great athlete killed himself and his girlfriend??? Insanity!! Because a man murdered the mother of his child and went and said good bye to his boss before he took the cowards way out and blew his brains all over the place. Costas used the event to further his political agenda. As are you and the other right wing trash. Good Christians, eh? Is Costas running for office? Just what is his political agenda? |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
ESAD wrote:
On 12/6/12 7:46 AM, GuzzisRule wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:55:36 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:03:07 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. ==== Judging from that article I'd have to say that the author, and probably you, share some confusion about the difference between values, religious beliefs and political beliefs. Sometimes reasonable people with high values have to agree to disagree. More importantly, it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others and then accuse them of lacking "values". Other than, possibly, the first one, there is nothing religious there. I don't consider the first one a religious position. 'Marriage' was an institution that had some meaning. Now liberals, especially, have made it a sham. And, I agree that 'it is 'it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others', and that includes atheists imposing theirs. If you can't read that and determine what 'values' are being discussed, then I can understand your comments. Funny post, really, and it shows how disconnected you are. Please explain how liberals have made marriage a sham and while you are at it, tell how atheists are "imposing" their beliefs. Atheists don't give a damn about your religious beliefs so long as you don't try to impose them on others. Atheists aren't imposing their beliefs on anyone...there are no door to door atheist. Atheists are using the court to enforce their beliefs. The door to door missionary is at least honest about their views, and you can just close the door in their face. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
GuzzisRule wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:55:36 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:03:07 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. ==== Judging from that article I'd have to say that the author, and probably you, share some confusion about the difference between values, religious beliefs and political beliefs. Sometimes reasonable people with high values have to agree to disagree. More importantly, it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others and then accuse them of lacking "values". Other than, possibly, the first one, there is nothing religious there. I don't consider the first one a religious position. 'Marriage' was an institution that had some meaning. Now liberals, especially, have made it a sham. And, I agree that 'it is 'it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others', and that includes atheists imposing theirs. If you can't read that and determine what 'values' are being discussed, then I can understand your comments. Religious beliefs are fine. Just do not force them on others, but likewise, others should not infringe your religious freedoms. And marriage has been different things through the years. Lots of the profits in the bible had multiple wives. In the 1800's you could marry multiple spouses in Texas, Alabama and another regions also. And not even have to be Mormon. Texas about we're married if you announced it in front of 20 witness's or signed in to a hotel as Mr. And Mrs. No church or state involved. It is supposed to be a free country. You want to marry same sex? Go for it. Just do not require the rest of unto pay for your lifestyle. Same goes for most drugs, do them, die if that happens, but do not expect society to pay for your medical bills. |
Bob Costas speaks the truth
On 12/6/2012 4:30 PM, Califbill wrote:
GuzzisRule wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:55:36 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:03:07 -0500, GuzzisRule wrote: This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the drift. http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last. ==== Judging from that article I'd have to say that the author, and probably you, share some confusion about the difference between values, religious beliefs and political beliefs. Sometimes reasonable people with high values have to agree to disagree. More importantly, it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others and then accuse them of lacking "values". Other than, possibly, the first one, there is nothing religious there. I don't consider the first one a religious position. 'Marriage' was an institution that had some meaning. Now liberals, especially, have made it a sham. And, I agree that 'it is 'it is inappropriate to try and impose your religious beliefs on others', and that includes atheists imposing theirs. If you can't read that and determine what 'values' are being discussed, then I can understand your comments. Religious beliefs are fine. Just do not force them on others, but likewise, others should not infringe your religious freedoms. And marriage has been different things through the years. Lots of the profits in the bible had multiple wives. In the 1800's you could marry multiple spouses in Texas, Alabama and another regions also. And not even have to be Mormon. Texas about we're married if you announced it in front of 20 witness's or signed in to a hotel as Mr. And Mrs. No church or state involved. It is supposed to be a free country. You want to marry same sex? Go for it. Just do not require the rest of unto pay for your lifestyle. Same goes for most drugs, do them, die if that happens, but do not expect society to pay for your medical bills. Atheists are bullying Christians all over the country. Putting up nasty posters to mock and just kill Christian freedom of speech at Nativities and such, even going as far as taking the word God from a 6 year olds poem to her granny at a school function, and getting "A Charlie Brown Christmas" banned... This is just intolerance and hate, nothing else... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com