| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
iBoaterer wrote:
In article 763124344376355344.039096bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article 326718259376344721.561541bmckeenospam- , says... Meyer wrote: On 12/4/2012 12:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:05:23 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... I am really amazed at the left's fascination with alternate energy schemes that use massive government subsidies to make them attractive. This is the quintessential welfare for the rich at the expense of the poor. Do you mean like the oil industry? Or our current electric generating facilities? They are subsidized you know.... The alternate energy subsidies are 10 to 20 times the subsidy for oil and gas, (per KWH produced) depending on which you are talking about. In gross numbers nuclear gets many times more money than oil and gas. I notice you haven't answered about which alternate energy scheme YOU have bought into with your own money. (other than that which was taken without your permission by the government) .. Loogy invest in alternative energy? He doesn't have the where with all. Snerk. He says he is moving non performing assets in to electric cars, etc. No wonder he has non performing assets. Bad investor. Really? Every automobile manufacturer that sells cars in the U.S. is working VERY hard on electric vehicles. Sure they are. Government requirement. How much ROI in those electric car companies? There is NO government requirement to produce electric cars, that is a lie. You want to stay out of trouble with the government, you better be working on electric cars. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article 411026179376452279.878853bmckeenospam-
, says... iBoaterer wrote: In article 763124344376355344.039096bmckeenospam- , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article 326718259376344721.561541bmckeenospam- , says... Meyer wrote: On 12/4/2012 12:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:05:23 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... I am really amazed at the left's fascination with alternate energy schemes that use massive government subsidies to make them attractive. This is the quintessential welfare for the rich at the expense of the poor. Do you mean like the oil industry? Or our current electric generating facilities? They are subsidized you know.... The alternate energy subsidies are 10 to 20 times the subsidy for oil and gas, (per KWH produced) depending on which you are talking about. In gross numbers nuclear gets many times more money than oil and gas. I notice you haven't answered about which alternate energy scheme YOU have bought into with your own money. (other than that which was taken without your permission by the government) .. Loogy invest in alternative energy? He doesn't have the where with all. Snerk. He says he is moving non performing assets in to electric cars, etc. No wonder he has non performing assets. Bad investor. Really? Every automobile manufacturer that sells cars in the U.S. is working VERY hard on electric vehicles. Sure they are. Government requirement. How much ROI in those electric car companies? There is NO government requirement to produce electric cars, that is a lie. You want to stay out of trouble with the government, you better be working on electric cars. Again, there is NO "government requirement to produce electric cars". |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
says... In article , says... On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:17:06 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Again, there is NO "government requirement to produce electric cars". There is an $8000 subsidy to buy one and at least one state that will require your car to be ZEV to register it so this is a distinction without a difference. Bull****. In CA you can get '60's vintage cars registered that surely don't meet there strict emissions regulations. Show me where in any state you'll only be able to register an ZEV vehicle. Show me. You are an idiot. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
BAR wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:17:06 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Again, there is NO "government requirement to produce electric cars". There is an $8000 subsidy to buy one and at least one state that will require your car to be ZEV to register it so this is a distinction without a difference. Bull****. In CA you can get '60's vintage cars registered that surely don't meet there strict emissions regulations. Show me where in any state you'll only be able to register an ZEV vehicle. Show me. You are an idiot. True you can register that 60's car. You have to register it. If you have an unregistered car on your property, they can come and confiscate said vehicle. May be a $500k classic, but they will take it and crush it. Older cars, before smog controls are exempt from same. The state under dictator Brown, has passed mpg rules, where a manufacturer will have to sell lots of ZEV to be able to sell cars people want and need. So those people buying a larger vehicle will be subsidizing those who buy a ZEV. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article 2029535646376538862.699507bmckeenospam-
, says... BAR wrote: In article , says... In article , says... On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:17:06 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Again, there is NO "government requirement to produce electric cars". There is an $8000 subsidy to buy one and at least one state that will require your car to be ZEV to register it so this is a distinction without a difference. Bull****. In CA you can get '60's vintage cars registered that surely don't meet there strict emissions regulations. Show me where in any state you'll only be able to register an ZEV vehicle. Show me. You are an idiot. True you can register that 60's car. You have to register it. If you have an unregistered car on your property, they can come and confiscate said vehicle. May be a $500k classic, but they will take it and crush it. Older cars, before smog controls are exempt from same. The state under dictator Brown, has passed mpg rules, where a manufacturer will have to sell lots of ZEV to be able to sell cars people want and need. So those people buying a larger vehicle will be subsidizing those who buy a ZEV. But Greg said that cars will be REQUIRED to be ZEV's to be registered, that is bull****. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:17:06 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: Again, there is NO "government requirement to produce electric cars". There is an $8000 subsidy to buy one and at least one state that will require your car to be ZEV to register it so this is a distinction without a difference. Bull****. In CA you can get '60's vintage cars registered that surely don't meet there strict emissions regulations. Show me where in any state you'll only be able to register an ZEV vehicle. Show me. You are an idiot. Do tell then, what did he mean by "at least one state that will REQUIRE your car to be ZEV to register"??? |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Scotty Doesn't Know... | General | |||
| Hey Timmy! Do you realize? | General | |||
| What scientist is going to lose his job/funding over this? | General | |||
| Don't Get Between A Scientist And His Research Dollars | General | |||
| I bet this guy doesn't mess with me again. | ASA | |||