Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
North Star wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:30 pm, Earl wrote: BAR wrote: In article , says... More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. T he cops are responsible for killing 1 man and wounding 9 others when the two cops started shooting. They should be given expert marksmanship badges for firing off 14 rounds and hitting 10 people. I hit a deer with my car many years ago and the cop that showed up for the accident report had to kill the injured deer that was laying on the side of the road with a broken leg. From less than 50 feet away he missed it and it took a 2nd shot to kill it. The police certainly need more firearm training - I could have hit it one-handed at that range. Sure you could Kruger... maybe with Margaret holding the other hand. Kurger isn't my last name, Sherlock, and Margret isn't my wife's name. Nice stalking attempt but you'll have to get some help from someone smarter. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A grand, unified theory... | General | |||
New theory for mystery barrel | General | |||
Hitch inversion theory | General | |||
SSB Antenna theory | Electronics | |||
Hull speed theory? | Boat Building |