In article , says...

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:35:49 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:47:21 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


The internet itself is considered a form of interstate commerce
under United States Code.

Cite?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Baker

I KNEW someone would bring up U.S. v Baker, that's why I asked!!! You do
realize that he was aquitted of all original counts, right? The only
thing they could get him for was a trumped up charge when they couldn't
persue the original charges.

You wanted a cite that the internet is considered a form of interstate
commerce under the United States Code. I gave you one. His quilt or
innocence is irrelevant to this conversation, but the ibls.com cite,
given above, is completely relevant.

No, it's not. in U.S. v Baker, the "relevant" thing was they proved that
he was innocent BECAUSE the internet was NOT considered a form of
interstate commerce.