On 8/10/12 5:05 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:



Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.

Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.

Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.

Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?

Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the
problem?


Does your continuous drooling in a boating newsgroup solve *anything* ?

--
I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant
science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern
Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country.

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:17:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 8/10/12 5:05 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:



Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.

Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.

Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.

Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?

Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the
problem?


Does your continuous drooling in a boating newsgroup solve *anything* ?


Does Herring playing golf "solve anything?" Probably just frustrates
the **** out of him, confirms his lack of athleticism and furthers his
low self esteem.

That's the perfect opportunity to blame his failures on the black man.

X ` Man wrote:
On 8/9/12 9:20 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 20:17:23 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Ban all knives!




You're probably stupid enough to believe that the Arizona mass shooting
by Loughner could have been duplicated with a knife.

--

Yeah, you need a bomb to do that kind of damage.


You have to be an ex-military rightie to do that, eh? You know, like
Tim McVeigh...

You can put your wide brush away anytime, Harry.

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote:

Aug 9 (Reuters) - The Tucson gunman who killed six people and severely
wounded Gabrielle Giffords has labeled himself a failure because the
former Arizona Congresswoman survived his rampage, according to a
prison psychologist's report released on Thursday.

The report's release comes two days after Jared Loughner, 23, in a
deal that will spare him the death penalty, pleaded guilty to six
murders and other charges stemming from his January 2011 shooting
spree at a Tucson supermarket.

Psychologist Christina Pietz, who evaluated Loughner at a federal
prison hospital in Missouri, said in the report that Loughner had
repeatedly made comments suggesting he thought Giffords died when he
shot her in the head.

At one time, he suggested he understood that Giffords was alive,
according to Pietz, who wrote that she pressed him on that point, and
he admitted to feeling disappointed in her survival because it meant
he "failed."

"I'm not an assassin," Pietz's report quoted Loughner, a community
college dropout, as saying.

Later on in the interview, he told Pietz: "Jared Loughner failed
again. He's a failure. So all of this would be for nothing."



Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that way we
can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the
criminally insane. Ammo too!
What's your solution, jps?

Should this country ban all guns?
Illicit drugs are banned. How's that working? The same scumbags are
using both!

Meyer wrote:
On 8/10/2012 8:38 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote:

Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that way we
can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the
criminally insane. Ammo too!

What's your solution, jps?

Should this country ban all guns?

Laws and bans only affect law abiding citizens.
And those without a history of mental deficiency.

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:08:46 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 8/10/2012 8:38 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote:
Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that way we
can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the
criminally insane. Ammo too!
What's your solution, jps?

Should this country ban all guns?

Laws and bans only affect law abiding citizens.
No fair, you're not jps!

I really would like to see his solution.
He's a whiner with no solutions that make sense.

X ` Man wrote:
On 8/10/12 12:09 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:08:46 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 8/10/2012 8:38 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote:

Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that
way we
can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the
criminally insane. Ammo too!

What's your solution, jps?

Should this country ban all guns?

Laws and bans only affect law abiding citizens.

No fair, you're not jps!

I really would like to see his solution.



Simple. Since all the domestic terrorists who engage in mass gun
murders seem to be righties, round all the gun-owning righties up,
put them and their firearms into a huge fenced area in Arizona or
Texas, drop in huge amounts of ammo, whiskey, crank, bibles and
condoms (but no food or water) and come back in a month to see which
one is still alive. Shoot him. If any of those righties held decent
jobs, give those jobs to the jobless and to hard-working Mexicans.

Un-****ing-believable! You are insane, Harry.

jps wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:


Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.
Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.
Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.
Yet the latter took down four planes on September 11, 2001.

On 8/10/12 10:03 PM, Earl wrote:
Meyer wrote:
On 8/10/2012 8:38 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote:

Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that way we
can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the
criminally insane. Ammo too!

What's your solution, jps?

Should this country ban all guns?

Laws and bans only affect law abiding citizens.
And those without a history of mental deficiency.


So, you don't have a gun, right, Earliepoo?

--
I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant
science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern
Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country.

On 8/10/2012 10:12 PM, Earl wrote:
X ` Man wrote:
On 8/10/12 12:09 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:08:46 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 8/10/2012 8:38 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote:

Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that
way we
can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the
criminally insane. Ammo too!

What's your solution, jps?

Should this country ban all guns?

Laws and bans only affect law abiding citizens.

No fair, you're not jps!

I really would like to see his solution.



Simple. Since all the domestic terrorists who engage in mass gun
murders seem to be righties, round all the gun-owning righties up,
put them and their firearms into a huge fenced area in Arizona or
Texas, drop in huge amounts of ammo, whiskey, crank, bibles and
condoms (but no food or water) and come back in a month to see which
one is still alive. Shoot him. If any of those righties held decent
jobs, give those jobs to the jobless and to hard-working Mexicans.

Un-****ing-believable! You are insane, Harry.

The more we ignore him, the more insane he will get...