wrote:
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:33:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/8/12 7:28 AM, wrote:

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:14:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:

On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote:



On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man



wrote:











We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years



ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources.







The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program.







I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed



Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You



are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and



fishing charters.



The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a



month so everyone else would understand where the money they have,



comes from.







You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base.



You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly



spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who



want to lose a widget factory in their district.







It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually



support.







DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to.















As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at



least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our



industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of



military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be



turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or



refrigerators.



So we should have socialized our industries, and should be turning out
high-priced goods nobody would buy. Yeah, that's the ticket.



You need to stick to things you know, like writing fiction.







You really need to move out of Stupidville, South Carolina. Nowhere did

I say we should have "socialized our industries."

Go back and read what you wrote. When you take federal funds from the
military and put it into factories that make common household goods, you
are socializing industry. That's exactly what you proposed.

Maybe that's why you are a liberal. You don't seem to understand what
they are all about, or even what you write.

When you spend federal funds on military hardware you are socializing
defense contractors.
--
Romneyism - The "Bain" of Our Existence

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:23:23 AM UTC-4, x'man wrote:
wrote:

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:33:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:

On 8/8/12 7:28 AM, wrote:



On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:14:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:



On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote:







On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man







wrote:























We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years







ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources.















The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program.















I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed







Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You







are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and







fishing charters.







The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a







month so everyone else would understand where the money they have,







comes from.















You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base.







You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly







spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who







want to lose a widget factory in their district.















It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually







support.















DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to.































As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at







least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our







industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of







military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be







turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or







refrigerators.







So we should have socialized our industries, and should be turning out

high-priced goods nobody would buy. Yeah, that's the ticket.







You need to stick to things you know, like writing fiction.















You really need to move out of Stupidville, South Carolina. Nowhere did



I say we should have "socialized our industries."



Go back and read what you wrote. When you take federal funds from the

military and put it into factories that make common household goods, you

are socializing industry. That's exactly what you proposed.



Maybe that's why you are a liberal. You don't seem to understand what

they are all about, or even what you write.



When you spend federal funds on military hardware you are socializing

defense contractors.

No, you are carrying out the constitutional requirement to provide for the defense of our country.

When you take over 300 billion dollars (half of the military budget) and use it to make refrigerators and lawnmowers (what you proposed), you are socializing industry.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:14:23 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:


We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years
ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources.

The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program.

I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed
Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You
are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and
fishing charters.
The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a
month so everyone else would understand where the money they have,
comes from.

You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base.
You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly
spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who
want to lose a widget factory in their district.

It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually
support.

DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to.



As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at
least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our
industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of
military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be
turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or
refrigerators.

Eisenhower tried to warn us about the dangers of the military
industrial complex in the 50s but JFK started the arms race as soon as
he got in power and it went from there.
The "missile gap" was his big lie. It was the first WMD scare that
wasn't true. JFK knew it wasn't true at his first national security
briefing but we still kept building more weapons.

Wow, so JFK and Bush have something in common!

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:51:01 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:14:23 -0400, X ` Man

wrote:



On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote:

On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man

wrote:





We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years

ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources.



The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program.



I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed

Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You

are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and

fishing charters.

The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a

month so everyone else would understand where the money they have,

comes from.



You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base.

You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly

spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who

want to lose a widget factory in their district.



It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually

support.



DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to.







As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at

least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our

industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of

military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be

turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or

refrigerators.



Eisenhower tried to warn us about the dangers of the military

industrial complex in the 50s but JFK started the arms race as soon as

he got in power and it went from there.

The "missile gap" was his big lie. It was the first WMD scare that

wasn't true. JFK knew it wasn't true at his first national security

briefing but we still kept building more weapons.



Wow, so JFK and Bush have something in common!

Not just Bush. Remember these words?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSwSDvgw5Uc

It was an epidemic in DC.

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:51:01 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:14:23 -0400, X ` Man

wrote:



On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote:

On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man

wrote:





We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years

ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources.



The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program.



I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed

Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You

are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and

fishing charters.

The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a

month so everyone else would understand where the money they have,

comes from.



You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base.

You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly

spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who

want to lose a widget factory in their district.



It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually

support.



DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to.







As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at

least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our

industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of

military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be

turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or

refrigerators.



Eisenhower tried to warn us about the dangers of the military

industrial complex in the 50s but JFK started the arms race as soon as

he got in power and it went from there.

The "missile gap" was his big lie. It was the first WMD scare that

wasn't true. JFK knew it wasn't true at his first national security

briefing but we still kept building more weapons.



Wow, so JFK and Bush have something in common!

Not just Bush. Remember these words?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSwSDvgw5Uc

It was an epidemic in DC.

None of those were POTUS.

On 8/8/12 9:38 AM, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:23:23 AM UTC-4, x'man wrote:
wrote:

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:33:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:

On 8/8/12 7:28 AM, wrote:



On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:14:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:



On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote:







On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man







wrote:























We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years







ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources.















The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program.















I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed







Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You







are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and







fishing charters.







The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a







month so everyone else would understand where the money they have,







comes from.















You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base.







You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly







spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who







want to lose a widget factory in their district.















It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually







support.















DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to.































As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at







least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our







industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of







military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be







turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or







refrigerators.







So we should have socialized our industries, and should be turning out

high-priced goods nobody would buy. Yeah, that's the ticket.







You need to stick to things you know, like writing fiction.















You really need to move out of Stupidville, South Carolina. Nowhere did



I say we should have "socialized our industries."



Go back and read what you wrote. When you take federal funds from the

military and put it into factories that make common household goods, you

are socializing industry. That's exactly what you proposed.



Maybe that's why you are a liberal. You don't seem to understand what

they are all about, or even what you write.



When you spend federal funds on military hardware you are socializing

defense contractors.

No, you are carrying out the constitutional requirement to provide for the defense of our country.

When you take over 300 billion dollars (half of the military budget) and use it to make refrigerators and lawnmowers (what you proposed), you are socializing industry.



There's nothing in the Constitution that specifies how much must be
spent on the military.

--
I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant
science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern
Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country.

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 10:37:25 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:51:01 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,



says...







On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:14:23 -0400, X ` Man



wrote:







On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote:



On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man



wrote:











We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years



ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources.







The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program.







I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed



Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You



are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and



fishing charters.



The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a



month so everyone else would understand where the money they have,



comes from.







You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base.



You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly



spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who



want to lose a widget factory in their district.







It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually



support.







DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to.















As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at



least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our



industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of



military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be



turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or



refrigerators.







Eisenhower tried to warn us about the dangers of the military



industrial complex in the 50s but JFK started the arms race as soon as



he got in power and it went from there.



The "missile gap" was his big lie. It was the first WMD scare that



wasn't true. JFK knew it wasn't true at his first national security



briefing but we still kept building more weapons.







Wow, so JFK and Bush have something in common!



Not just Bush. Remember these words?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSwSDvgw5Uc



It was an epidemic in DC.



None of those were POTUS.

The second person on the video was Clinton. He was POTUS, remember?

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 10:39:19 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/8/12 9:38 AM, wrote:

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:23:23 AM UTC-4, x'man wrote:

wrote:



On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:33:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:



On 8/8/12 7:28 AM, wrote:







On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:14:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:







On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote:















On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man















wrote:















































We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years















ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources.































The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program.































I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed















Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You















are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and















fishing charters.















The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a















month so everyone else would understand where the money they have,















comes from.































You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base.















You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly















spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who















want to lose a widget factory in their district.































It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually















support.































DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to.































































As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at















least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our















industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of















military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be















turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or















refrigerators.















So we should have socialized our industries, and should be turning out



high-priced goods nobody would buy. Yeah, that's the ticket.















You need to stick to things you know, like writing fiction.































You really need to move out of Stupidville, South Carolina. Nowhere did







I say we should have "socialized our industries."







Go back and read what you wrote. When you take federal funds from the



military and put it into factories that make common household goods, you



are socializing industry. That's exactly what you proposed.







Maybe that's why you are a liberal. You don't seem to understand what



they are all about, or even what you write.







When you spend federal funds on military hardware you are socializing



defense contractors.



No, you are carrying out the constitutional requirement to provide for the defense of our country.



When you take over 300 billion dollars (half of the military budget) and use it to make refrigerators and lawnmowers (what you proposed), you are socializing industry.







There's nothing in the Constitution that specifies how much must be

spent on the military.

There's also nothing in the Constitution authorizing socialization of US industry.

On 8/8/12 10:49 AM, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 10:39:19 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/8/12 9:38 AM, wrote:

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:23:23 AM UTC-4, x'man wrote:

wrote:



On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:33:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:



On 8/8/12 7:28 AM, wrote:







On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:14:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:







On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote:















On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man















wrote:















































We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years















ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources.































The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program.































I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed















Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You















are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and















fishing charters.















The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a















month so everyone else would understand where the money they have,















comes from.































You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base.















You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly















spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who















want to lose a widget factory in their district.































It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually















support.































DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to.































































As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at















least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our















industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of















military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be















turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or















refrigerators.















So we should have socialized our industries, and should be turning out



high-priced goods nobody would buy. Yeah, that's the ticket.















You need to stick to things you know, like writing fiction.































You really need to move out of Stupidville, South Carolina. Nowhere did







I say we should have "socialized our industries."







Go back and read what you wrote. When you take federal funds from the



military and put it into factories that make common household goods, you



are socializing industry. That's exactly what you proposed.







Maybe that's why you are a liberal. You don't seem to understand what



they are all about, or even what you write.







When you spend federal funds on military hardware you are socializing



defense contractors.



No, you are carrying out the constitutional requirement to provide for the defense of our country.



When you take over 300 billion dollars (half of the military budget) and use it to make refrigerators and lawnmowers (what you proposed), you are socializing industry.







There's nothing in the Constitution that specifies how much must be

spent on the military.

There's also nothing in the Constitution authorizing socialization of US industry.


No one is suggesting that. The conclusion you reached is a figment of
your imagination. Were you edu-ma-cated in South Carolina?

--
I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant
science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern
Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country.

On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:02:09 -0400, X ` Man wrote:

On 8/8/12 10:49 AM, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 10:39:19 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/8/12 9:38 AM, wrote:

On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 9:23:23 AM UTC-4, x'man wrote:

wrote:



On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:33:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:



On 8/8/12 7:28 AM, wrote:







On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:14:23 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:







On 8/8/12 12:05 AM, wrote:















On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 20:47:31 -0400, X ` Man















wrote:















































We should have cut military expenditures by 50 percent a dozen years















ago, and kept on cutting. What a colossal waste of national resources.































The real problem is that is probably the biggest single jobs program.































I was just in Southern Md and the Navy points out that if they closed















Pax River the whole economy down there would dry up and blow away. You















are certainly not supporting that area with a few crab shacks and















fishing charters.















The CO even thought of paying everyone on the base with $2 bills for a















month so everyone else would understand where the money they have,















comes from.































You hear the same thing everywhere there is a military base.















You also have all if the defense contractors, that are fairly evenly















spread across the whole country. There are very few congressmen who















want to lose a widget factory in their district.































It is the kind of Keynesian socialism lefties like you usually















support.































DoD is a drug that the whole country is addicted to.































































As I stated, we should have started cutting the military drastically at















least a dozen years ago, and turned our attention towards rebuilding our















industries and infrastructure, instead of pouring it down the toilet of















military expenditures. Those military hardware factories could be















turning out components for high speed rail lines or lawnmowers or















refrigerators.















So we should have socialized our industries, and should be turning out



high-priced goods nobody would buy. Yeah, that's the ticket.















You need to stick to things you know, like writing fiction.































You really need to move out of Stupidville, South Carolina. Nowhere did







I say we should have "socialized our industries."







Go back and read what you wrote. When you take federal funds from the



military and put it into factories that make common household goods, you



are socializing industry. That's exactly what you proposed.







Maybe that's why you are a liberal. You don't seem to understand what



they are all about, or even what you write.







When you spend federal funds on military hardware you are socializing



defense contractors.



No, you are carrying out the constitutional requirement to provide for the defense of our country.



When you take over 300 billion dollars (half of the military budget) and use it to make refrigerators and lawnmowers (what you proposed), you are socializing industry.







There's nothing in the Constitution that specifies how much must be

spent on the military.

There's also nothing in the Constitution authorizing socialization of US industry.


No one is suggesting that. The conclusion you reached is a figment of
your imagination. Were you edu-ma-cated in South Carolina?

Gotta attack the person when losing, Harry?

WATOABH!